Cargando…

Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics

Noise-normalization has been shown to partly compensate for the localization bias towards superficial sources in minimum norm estimation. However, it has been argued that in order to make inferences for the case of multiple sources, localization properties alone are insufficient. Instead, multiple m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauk, Olaf, Wakeman, Daniel G., Henson, Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20884360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.053
_version_ 1782196093432365056
author Hauk, Olaf
Wakeman, Daniel G.
Henson, Richard
author_facet Hauk, Olaf
Wakeman, Daniel G.
Henson, Richard
author_sort Hauk, Olaf
collection PubMed
description Noise-normalization has been shown to partly compensate for the localization bias towards superficial sources in minimum norm estimation. However, it has been argued that in order to make inferences for the case of multiple sources, localization properties alone are insufficient. Instead, multiple measures of resolution should be applied to both point-spread and cross-talk functions (PSFs and CTFs). Here, we demonstrate that noise-normalization affects the shapes of PSFs, but not of CTFs. We evaluated PSFs and CTFs for the MNE, dSPM and sLORETA inverse operators, on the metrics dipole localization error (DLE), spatial dispersion (SD) and overall amplitude (OA). We used 306-channel MEG configurations obtained from 17 subjects in a real experiment, including individual noise covariance matrices and head geometries. We confirmed that for PSFs DLE improved after noise normalization, and is zero for sLORETA. However, SD was generally lower for the unnormalized MNE. OA distributions were similar for all three methods, indicating that all three methods may greatly underestimate some sources relative to others. The reliability of differences between methods across subjects was demonstrated using distributions of standard deviations and p-values from paired t-tests. As predicted, the shapes of CTFs were the same for all methods, reflecting the general resolution limits of the inverse problem. This means that noise-normalization is of no consequence where linear estimation procedures are used as “spatial filters.” While low DLE is advantageous for the localization of a single source, or possibly a few spatially distinct sources, the benefit for the case of complex source distributions is not obvious. We suggest that software packages for source estimation should include comprehensive tools for evaluating the performance of different methods.
format Text
id pubmed-3018574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30185742011-02-10 Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics Hauk, Olaf Wakeman, Daniel G. Henson, Richard Neuroimage Article Noise-normalization has been shown to partly compensate for the localization bias towards superficial sources in minimum norm estimation. However, it has been argued that in order to make inferences for the case of multiple sources, localization properties alone are insufficient. Instead, multiple measures of resolution should be applied to both point-spread and cross-talk functions (PSFs and CTFs). Here, we demonstrate that noise-normalization affects the shapes of PSFs, but not of CTFs. We evaluated PSFs and CTFs for the MNE, dSPM and sLORETA inverse operators, on the metrics dipole localization error (DLE), spatial dispersion (SD) and overall amplitude (OA). We used 306-channel MEG configurations obtained from 17 subjects in a real experiment, including individual noise covariance matrices and head geometries. We confirmed that for PSFs DLE improved after noise normalization, and is zero for sLORETA. However, SD was generally lower for the unnormalized MNE. OA distributions were similar for all three methods, indicating that all three methods may greatly underestimate some sources relative to others. The reliability of differences between methods across subjects was demonstrated using distributions of standard deviations and p-values from paired t-tests. As predicted, the shapes of CTFs were the same for all methods, reflecting the general resolution limits of the inverse problem. This means that noise-normalization is of no consequence where linear estimation procedures are used as “spatial filters.” While low DLE is advantageous for the localization of a single source, or possibly a few spatially distinct sources, the benefit for the case of complex source distributions is not obvious. We suggest that software packages for source estimation should include comprehensive tools for evaluating the performance of different methods. Academic Press 2011-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3018574/ /pubmed/20884360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.053 Text en © 2011 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Hauk, Olaf
Wakeman, Daniel G.
Henson, Richard
Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics
title Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics
title_full Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics
title_fullStr Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics
title_short Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics
title_sort comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for meg analysis using multiple resolution metrics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20884360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.053
work_keys_str_mv AT haukolaf comparisonofnoisenormalizedminimumnormestimatesformeganalysisusingmultipleresolutionmetrics
AT wakemandanielg comparisonofnoisenormalizedminimumnormestimatesformeganalysisusingmultipleresolutionmetrics
AT hensonrichard comparisonofnoisenormalizedminimumnormestimatesformeganalysisusingmultipleresolutionmetrics