Cargando…
TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large?
BPH remains one of the most common disease that the urologist has to manage. The last decade brought numerous new techniques, aiming to improve the minimally invasive approach to BPH, but none had, for the moment, changed the place of TURP as the gold standard treatment for medium sized prostates. B...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Carol Davila University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21254734 |
_version_ | 1782196157601021952 |
---|---|
author | Persu, C Georgescu, D Arabagiu, I Cauni, V Moldoveanu, C Geavlete, P |
author_facet | Persu, C Georgescu, D Arabagiu, I Cauni, V Moldoveanu, C Geavlete, P |
author_sort | Persu, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BPH remains one of the most common disease that the urologist has to manage. The last decade brought numerous new techniques, aiming to improve the minimally invasive approach to BPH, but none had, for the moment, changed the place of TURP as the gold standard treatment for medium sized prostates. Based on a large personal experience, the authors present a study in which TURP is used for prostates over 80ml, the cutoff point set by the guidelines of the European Association of Urology. The rationale for this study is that many situations require minimally invasive treatment, based on the express request of the patient, other conditions that makes open surgery very difficult or impossible, or the need for a quick discharge in an overcrowded service. The aim of the study was to prove that TURP is safe and effective even in larger prostates. The technique used is basically the classic one, with minor tactical alterations in some cases. Some cases required a two-stage approach, but offered good functional results after the first stage. The results proved that, with a good technique, a skilled urologist might achieve the same results by using TURP or open surgery for large sized prostates. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3019067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Carol Davila University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30190672011-03-03 TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large? Persu, C Georgescu, D Arabagiu, I Cauni, V Moldoveanu, C Geavlete, P J Med Life Original Article BPH remains one of the most common disease that the urologist has to manage. The last decade brought numerous new techniques, aiming to improve the minimally invasive approach to BPH, but none had, for the moment, changed the place of TURP as the gold standard treatment for medium sized prostates. Based on a large personal experience, the authors present a study in which TURP is used for prostates over 80ml, the cutoff point set by the guidelines of the European Association of Urology. The rationale for this study is that many situations require minimally invasive treatment, based on the express request of the patient, other conditions that makes open surgery very difficult or impossible, or the need for a quick discharge in an overcrowded service. The aim of the study was to prove that TURP is safe and effective even in larger prostates. The technique used is basically the classic one, with minor tactical alterations in some cases. Some cases required a two-stage approach, but offered good functional results after the first stage. The results proved that, with a good technique, a skilled urologist might achieve the same results by using TURP or open surgery for large sized prostates. Carol Davila University Press 2010-11-15 2010-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3019067/ /pubmed/21254734 Text en ©Carol Davila University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Persu, C Georgescu, D Arabagiu, I Cauni, V Moldoveanu, C Geavlete, P TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large? |
title | TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large?
|
title_full | TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large?
|
title_fullStr | TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large?
|
title_full_unstemmed | TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large?
|
title_short | TURP for BPH. How Large is Too Large?
|
title_sort | turp for bph. how large is too large? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21254734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT persuc turpforbphhowlargeistoolarge AT georgescud turpforbphhowlargeistoolarge AT arabagiui turpforbphhowlargeistoolarge AT cauniv turpforbphhowlargeistoolarge AT moldoveanuc turpforbphhowlargeistoolarge AT geavletep turpforbphhowlargeistoolarge |