Cargando…

Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review

CONTEXT: An effective application of biofeedback for interventions in older adults with balance and mobility disorders may be compromised due to co-morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of biofeedback-based training of balance and/or mobility in older adults. DATA S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zijlstra, Agnes, Mancini, Martina, Chiari, Lorenzo, Zijlstra, Wiebren
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21143921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-58
_version_ 1782196182515187712
author Zijlstra, Agnes
Mancini, Martina
Chiari, Lorenzo
Zijlstra, Wiebren
author_facet Zijlstra, Agnes
Mancini, Martina
Chiari, Lorenzo
Zijlstra, Wiebren
author_sort Zijlstra, Agnes
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: An effective application of biofeedback for interventions in older adults with balance and mobility disorders may be compromised due to co-morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of biofeedback-based training of balance and/or mobility in older adults. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (1950-2009), EMBASE (1988-2009), Web of Science (1945-2009), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960-2009), CINAHL (1982-2009) and PsycINFO (1840-2009). The search strategy was composed of terms referring to biofeedback, balance or mobility, and older adults. Additional studies were identified by scanning reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: For evaluating effectiveness, 2 reviewers independently screened papers and included controlled studies in older adults (i.e. mean age equal to or greater than 60 years) if they applied biofeedback during repeated practice sessions, and if they used at least one objective outcome measure of a balance or mobility task. DATA EXTRACTION: Rating of study quality, with use of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database rating scale (PEDro scale), was performed independently by the 2 reviewers. Indications for (non)effectiveness were identified if 2 or more similar studies reported a (non)significant effect for the same type of outcome. Effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although most available studies did not systematically evaluate feasibility aspects, reports of high participation rates, low drop-out rates, absence of adverse events and positive training experiences suggest that biofeedback methods can be applied in older adults. Effectiveness was evaluated based on 21 studies, mostly of moderate quality. An indication for effectiveness of visual feedback-based training of balance in (frail) older adults was identified for postural sway, weight-shifting and reaction time in standing, and for the Berg Balance Scale. Indications for added effectiveness of applying biofeedback during training of balance, gait, or sit-to-stand transfers in older patients post-stroke were identified for training-specific aspects. The same applies for auditory feedback-based training of gait in older patients with lower-limb surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Further appropriate studies are needed in different populations of older adults to be able to make definitive statements regarding the (long-term) added effectiveness, particularly on measures of functioning.
format Text
id pubmed-3019192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30191922011-01-12 Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review Zijlstra, Agnes Mancini, Martina Chiari, Lorenzo Zijlstra, Wiebren J Neuroeng Rehabil Review CONTEXT: An effective application of biofeedback for interventions in older adults with balance and mobility disorders may be compromised due to co-morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and the effectiveness of biofeedback-based training of balance and/or mobility in older adults. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (1950-2009), EMBASE (1988-2009), Web of Science (1945-2009), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960-2009), CINAHL (1982-2009) and PsycINFO (1840-2009). The search strategy was composed of terms referring to biofeedback, balance or mobility, and older adults. Additional studies were identified by scanning reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: For evaluating effectiveness, 2 reviewers independently screened papers and included controlled studies in older adults (i.e. mean age equal to or greater than 60 years) if they applied biofeedback during repeated practice sessions, and if they used at least one objective outcome measure of a balance or mobility task. DATA EXTRACTION: Rating of study quality, with use of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database rating scale (PEDro scale), was performed independently by the 2 reviewers. Indications for (non)effectiveness were identified if 2 or more similar studies reported a (non)significant effect for the same type of outcome. Effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although most available studies did not systematically evaluate feasibility aspects, reports of high participation rates, low drop-out rates, absence of adverse events and positive training experiences suggest that biofeedback methods can be applied in older adults. Effectiveness was evaluated based on 21 studies, mostly of moderate quality. An indication for effectiveness of visual feedback-based training of balance in (frail) older adults was identified for postural sway, weight-shifting and reaction time in standing, and for the Berg Balance Scale. Indications for added effectiveness of applying biofeedback during training of balance, gait, or sit-to-stand transfers in older patients post-stroke were identified for training-specific aspects. The same applies for auditory feedback-based training of gait in older patients with lower-limb surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Further appropriate studies are needed in different populations of older adults to be able to make definitive statements regarding the (long-term) added effectiveness, particularly on measures of functioning. BioMed Central 2010-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3019192/ /pubmed/21143921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-58 Text en Copyright ©2010 Zijlstra et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Zijlstra, Agnes
Mancini, Martina
Chiari, Lorenzo
Zijlstra, Wiebren
Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
title Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
title_full Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
title_fullStr Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
title_short Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
title_sort biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21143921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-58
work_keys_str_mv AT zijlstraagnes biofeedbackfortrainingbalanceandmobilitytasksinolderpopulationsasystematicreview
AT mancinimartina biofeedbackfortrainingbalanceandmobilitytasksinolderpopulationsasystematicreview
AT chiarilorenzo biofeedbackfortrainingbalanceandmobilitytasksinolderpopulationsasystematicreview
AT zijlstrawiebren biofeedbackfortrainingbalanceandmobilitytasksinolderpopulationsasystematicreview