Cargando…

A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community

BACKGROUND: In recent years numerous studies have undertaken to measure the impact of patents, material transfer agreements, data-withholding and commercialization pressures on biomedical researchers. Of particular concern is the theory that such pressures may have negative effects on academic and o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voell, Matthew R, Farris, Lily, Levy, Edwin, Marden, Emily
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-708
_version_ 1782196193243168768
author Voell, Matthew R
Farris, Lily
Levy, Edwin
Marden, Emily
author_facet Voell, Matthew R
Farris, Lily
Levy, Edwin
Marden, Emily
author_sort Voell, Matthew R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years numerous studies have undertaken to measure the impact of patents, material transfer agreements, data-withholding and commercialization pressures on biomedical researchers. Of particular concern is the theory that such pressures may have negative effects on academic and other upstream researchers. In response to these concerns, commentators in some research communities have called for an increased level of access to, and sharing of, data and research materials. We have been studying how data and materials are shared in the community of researchers who use the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) as a model organism for biological research. Specifically, we conducted a textual analysis of academic articles referencing C. elegans, reviewed C. elegans repository request lists, scanned patents that reference C. elegans and conducted a broad survey of C. elegans researchers. Of particular importance in our research was the role of the C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium in the facilitation of sharing in this community. RESULTS: Our research suggests that a culture of sharing exists within the C. elegans research community. Furthermore, our research provides insight into how this sharing operates and the role of the culture that underpins it. CONCLUSIONS: The greater scientific community is likely to benefit from understanding the factors that motivate C. elegans researchers to share. In this sense, our research is a 'response' to calls for a greater amount of sharing in other research communities, such as the mouse community, specifically, the call for increased investment and support of centralized resource sharing infrastructure, grant-based funding of data-sharing, clarity of third party recommendations regarding sharing, third party insistence of post-publication data sharing, a decrease in patenting and restrictive material transfer agreements, and increased attribution and reward.
format Text
id pubmed-3019234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30192342011-01-12 A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community Voell, Matthew R Farris, Lily Levy, Edwin Marden, Emily BMC Genomics Correspondence BACKGROUND: In recent years numerous studies have undertaken to measure the impact of patents, material transfer agreements, data-withholding and commercialization pressures on biomedical researchers. Of particular concern is the theory that such pressures may have negative effects on academic and other upstream researchers. In response to these concerns, commentators in some research communities have called for an increased level of access to, and sharing of, data and research materials. We have been studying how data and materials are shared in the community of researchers who use the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) as a model organism for biological research. Specifically, we conducted a textual analysis of academic articles referencing C. elegans, reviewed C. elegans repository request lists, scanned patents that reference C. elegans and conducted a broad survey of C. elegans researchers. Of particular importance in our research was the role of the C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium in the facilitation of sharing in this community. RESULTS: Our research suggests that a culture of sharing exists within the C. elegans research community. Furthermore, our research provides insight into how this sharing operates and the role of the culture that underpins it. CONCLUSIONS: The greater scientific community is likely to benefit from understanding the factors that motivate C. elegans researchers to share. In this sense, our research is a 'response' to calls for a greater amount of sharing in other research communities, such as the mouse community, specifically, the call for increased investment and support of centralized resource sharing infrastructure, grant-based funding of data-sharing, clarity of third party recommendations regarding sharing, third party insistence of post-publication data sharing, a decrease in patenting and restrictive material transfer agreements, and increased attribution and reward. BioMed Central 2010-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3019234/ /pubmed/21162753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-708 Text en Copyright ©2010 Voell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Voell, Matthew R
Farris, Lily
Levy, Edwin
Marden, Emily
A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community
title A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community
title_full A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community
title_fullStr A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community
title_full_unstemmed A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community
title_short A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community
title_sort response to rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the c. elegans research community
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-708
work_keys_str_mv AT voellmatthewr aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity
AT farrislily aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity
AT levyedwin aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity
AT mardenemily aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity
AT voellmatthewr responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity
AT farrislily responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity
AT levyedwin responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity
AT mardenemily responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity