Cargando…
A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community
BACKGROUND: In recent years numerous studies have undertaken to measure the impact of patents, material transfer agreements, data-withholding and commercialization pressures on biomedical researchers. Of particular concern is the theory that such pressures may have negative effects on academic and o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-708 |
_version_ | 1782196193243168768 |
---|---|
author | Voell, Matthew R Farris, Lily Levy, Edwin Marden, Emily |
author_facet | Voell, Matthew R Farris, Lily Levy, Edwin Marden, Emily |
author_sort | Voell, Matthew R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In recent years numerous studies have undertaken to measure the impact of patents, material transfer agreements, data-withholding and commercialization pressures on biomedical researchers. Of particular concern is the theory that such pressures may have negative effects on academic and other upstream researchers. In response to these concerns, commentators in some research communities have called for an increased level of access to, and sharing of, data and research materials. We have been studying how data and materials are shared in the community of researchers who use the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) as a model organism for biological research. Specifically, we conducted a textual analysis of academic articles referencing C. elegans, reviewed C. elegans repository request lists, scanned patents that reference C. elegans and conducted a broad survey of C. elegans researchers. Of particular importance in our research was the role of the C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium in the facilitation of sharing in this community. RESULTS: Our research suggests that a culture of sharing exists within the C. elegans research community. Furthermore, our research provides insight into how this sharing operates and the role of the culture that underpins it. CONCLUSIONS: The greater scientific community is likely to benefit from understanding the factors that motivate C. elegans researchers to share. In this sense, our research is a 'response' to calls for a greater amount of sharing in other research communities, such as the mouse community, specifically, the call for increased investment and support of centralized resource sharing infrastructure, grant-based funding of data-sharing, clarity of third party recommendations regarding sharing, third party insistence of post-publication data sharing, a decrease in patenting and restrictive material transfer agreements, and increased attribution and reward. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3019234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30192342011-01-12 A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community Voell, Matthew R Farris, Lily Levy, Edwin Marden, Emily BMC Genomics Correspondence BACKGROUND: In recent years numerous studies have undertaken to measure the impact of patents, material transfer agreements, data-withholding and commercialization pressures on biomedical researchers. Of particular concern is the theory that such pressures may have negative effects on academic and other upstream researchers. In response to these concerns, commentators in some research communities have called for an increased level of access to, and sharing of, data and research materials. We have been studying how data and materials are shared in the community of researchers who use the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) as a model organism for biological research. Specifically, we conducted a textual analysis of academic articles referencing C. elegans, reviewed C. elegans repository request lists, scanned patents that reference C. elegans and conducted a broad survey of C. elegans researchers. Of particular importance in our research was the role of the C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium in the facilitation of sharing in this community. RESULTS: Our research suggests that a culture of sharing exists within the C. elegans research community. Furthermore, our research provides insight into how this sharing operates and the role of the culture that underpins it. CONCLUSIONS: The greater scientific community is likely to benefit from understanding the factors that motivate C. elegans researchers to share. In this sense, our research is a 'response' to calls for a greater amount of sharing in other research communities, such as the mouse community, specifically, the call for increased investment and support of centralized resource sharing infrastructure, grant-based funding of data-sharing, clarity of third party recommendations regarding sharing, third party insistence of post-publication data sharing, a decrease in patenting and restrictive material transfer agreements, and increased attribution and reward. BioMed Central 2010-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3019234/ /pubmed/21162753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-708 Text en Copyright ©2010 Voell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Voell, Matthew R Farris, Lily Levy, Edwin Marden, Emily A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community |
title | A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community |
title_full | A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community |
title_fullStr | A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community |
title_full_unstemmed | A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community |
title_short | A response to Rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the C. elegans research community |
title_sort | response to rome: lessons from pre- and post-publication data-sharing in the c. elegans research community |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voellmatthewr aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity AT farrislily aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity AT levyedwin aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity AT mardenemily aresponsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity AT voellmatthewr responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity AT farrislily responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity AT levyedwin responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity AT mardenemily responsetoromelessonsfrompreandpostpublicationdatasharinginthecelegansresearchcommunity |