Cargando…
Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21228920 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010191 |
_version_ | 1782196256728154112 |
---|---|
author | Giacomelli, Luca Derchi, Giacomo Frustaci, Andrea Bruno, Orlando Covani, Ugo Barone, Antonio De Santis, Daniele Chiappelli, Francesco |
author_facet | Giacomelli, Luca Derchi, Giacomo Frustaci, Andrea Bruno, Orlando Covani, Ugo Barone, Antonio De Santis, Daniele Chiappelli, Francesco |
author_sort | Giacomelli, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height. RESULTS: PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3019617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30196172011-01-12 Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy Giacomelli, Luca Derchi, Giacomo Frustaci, Andrea Bruno, Orlando Covani, Ugo Barone, Antonio De Santis, Daniele Chiappelli, Francesco Open Dent J Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height. RESULTS: PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols. Bentham Open 2010-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3019617/ /pubmed/21228920 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010191 Text en © Giacomelli et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Giacomelli, Luca Derchi, Giacomo Frustaci, Andrea Bruno, Orlando Covani, Ugo Barone, Antonio De Santis, Daniele Chiappelli, Francesco Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy |
title | Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy |
title_full | Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy |
title_fullStr | Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy |
title_short | Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy |
title_sort | surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21228920 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giacomelliluca surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy AT derchigiacomo surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy AT frustaciandrea surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy AT brunoorlando surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy AT covaniugo surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy AT baroneantonio surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy AT desantisdaniele surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy AT chiappellifrancesco surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy |