Cargando…

Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giacomelli, Luca, Derchi, Giacomo, Frustaci, Andrea, Bruno, Orlando, Covani, Ugo, Barone, Antonio, De Santis, Daniele, Chiappelli, Francesco
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21228920
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010191
_version_ 1782196256728154112
author Giacomelli, Luca
Derchi, Giacomo
Frustaci, Andrea
Bruno, Orlando
Covani, Ugo
Barone, Antonio
De Santis, Daniele
Chiappelli, Francesco
author_facet Giacomelli, Luca
Derchi, Giacomo
Frustaci, Andrea
Bruno, Orlando
Covani, Ugo
Barone, Antonio
De Santis, Daniele
Chiappelli, Francesco
author_sort Giacomelli, Luca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height. RESULTS: PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols.
format Text
id pubmed-3019617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30196172011-01-12 Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy Giacomelli, Luca Derchi, Giacomo Frustaci, Andrea Bruno, Orlando Covani, Ugo Barone, Antonio De Santis, Daniele Chiappelli, Francesco Open Dent J Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height. RESULTS: PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols. Bentham Open 2010-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3019617/ /pubmed/21228920 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010191 Text en © Giacomelli et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Giacomelli, Luca
Derchi, Giacomo
Frustaci, Andrea
Bruno, Orlando
Covani, Ugo
Barone, Antonio
De Santis, Daniele
Chiappelli, Francesco
Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy
title Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy
title_full Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy
title_fullStr Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy
title_short Surface Roughness of Commercial Composites after Different Polishing Protocols: An Analysis with Atomic Force Microscopy
title_sort surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3019617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21228920
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010191
work_keys_str_mv AT giacomelliluca surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy
AT derchigiacomo surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy
AT frustaciandrea surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy
AT brunoorlando surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy
AT covaniugo surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy
AT baroneantonio surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy
AT desantisdaniele surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy
AT chiappellifrancesco surfaceroughnessofcommercialcompositesafterdifferentpolishingprotocolsananalysiswithatomicforcemicroscopy