Cargando…

Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this non-randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) program as compared to a Stabilization Exercise (SE) program in subjects with persistent low back pain (LBP) at short- and mid-term follow-up (ie. 3 and 6 months). MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonetti, Francesca, Curti, Stefania, Mattioli, Stefano, Mugnai, Raffaele, Vanti, Carla, Violante, Francesco S, Pillastrini, Paolo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-285
_version_ 1782196269915045888
author Bonetti, Francesca
Curti, Stefania
Mattioli, Stefano
Mugnai, Raffaele
Vanti, Carla
Violante, Francesco S
Pillastrini, Paolo
author_facet Bonetti, Francesca
Curti, Stefania
Mattioli, Stefano
Mugnai, Raffaele
Vanti, Carla
Violante, Francesco S
Pillastrini, Paolo
author_sort Bonetti, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this non-randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) program as compared to a Stabilization Exercise (SE) program in subjects with persistent low back pain (LBP) at short- and mid-term follow-up (ie. 3 and 6 months). METHODS: According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 100 patients with a primary complaint of persistent LBP were enrolled in the study: 50 were allocated to the GPR group and 50 to the SE group. Primary outcome measures were Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were lumbar Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Fingertip-to-floor test (FFT). Data were collected at baseline and at 3/6 months by health care professionals unaware of the study. An intention to treat approach was used to analyze participants according to the group to which they were originally assigned. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients initially included in the study, 78 patients completed the study: 42 in the GPR group and 36 in the SE group. At baseline, the two groups did not differ significantly with respect to gender, age, BMI and outcome measures. Comparing the differences between groups at short- and mid-term follow-up, the GPR group revealed a significant reduction (from baseline) in all outcome measures with respect to the SE group. The ordered logistic regression model showed an increased likelihood of definitive improvement (reduction from baseline of at least 30% in RMDQ and VAS scores) for the GPR group compared to the SE group (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.7 to 5.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a GPR intervention in subjects with persistent LBP induces a greater improvement on pain and disability as compared to a SE program. These results must be confirmed by further studies with higher methodological standards, including randomization, larger sample size, longer follow-up and subgrouping of the LBP subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00789204
format Text
id pubmed-3020172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30201722011-01-13 Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial Bonetti, Francesca Curti, Stefania Mattioli, Stefano Mugnai, Raffaele Vanti, Carla Violante, Francesco S Pillastrini, Paolo BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this non-randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) program as compared to a Stabilization Exercise (SE) program in subjects with persistent low back pain (LBP) at short- and mid-term follow-up (ie. 3 and 6 months). METHODS: According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 100 patients with a primary complaint of persistent LBP were enrolled in the study: 50 were allocated to the GPR group and 50 to the SE group. Primary outcome measures were Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were lumbar Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Fingertip-to-floor test (FFT). Data were collected at baseline and at 3/6 months by health care professionals unaware of the study. An intention to treat approach was used to analyze participants according to the group to which they were originally assigned. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients initially included in the study, 78 patients completed the study: 42 in the GPR group and 36 in the SE group. At baseline, the two groups did not differ significantly with respect to gender, age, BMI and outcome measures. Comparing the differences between groups at short- and mid-term follow-up, the GPR group revealed a significant reduction (from baseline) in all outcome measures with respect to the SE group. The ordered logistic regression model showed an increased likelihood of definitive improvement (reduction from baseline of at least 30% in RMDQ and VAS scores) for the GPR group compared to the SE group (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.7 to 5.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a GPR intervention in subjects with persistent LBP induces a greater improvement on pain and disability as compared to a SE program. These results must be confirmed by further studies with higher methodological standards, including randomization, larger sample size, longer follow-up and subgrouping of the LBP subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00789204 BioMed Central 2010-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3020172/ /pubmed/21162726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-285 Text en Copyright ©2010 Bonetti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bonetti, Francesca
Curti, Stefania
Mattioli, Stefano
Mugnai, Raffaele
Vanti, Carla
Violante, Francesco S
Pillastrini, Paolo
Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
title Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of a 'global postural reeducation' program for persistent low back pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-285
work_keys_str_mv AT bonettifrancesca effectivenessofaglobalposturalreeducationprogramforpersistentlowbackpainanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT curtistefania effectivenessofaglobalposturalreeducationprogramforpersistentlowbackpainanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mattiolistefano effectivenessofaglobalposturalreeducationprogramforpersistentlowbackpainanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mugnairaffaele effectivenessofaglobalposturalreeducationprogramforpersistentlowbackpainanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanticarla effectivenessofaglobalposturalreeducationprogramforpersistentlowbackpainanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT violantefrancescos effectivenessofaglobalposturalreeducationprogramforpersistentlowbackpainanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pillastrinipaolo effectivenessofaglobalposturalreeducationprogramforpersistentlowbackpainanonrandomizedcontrolledtrial