Cargando…

CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry

PURPOSE: Vascular closure devices are routinely used after many vascular interventional radiology procedures. However, there have been no major multicenter studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of the routine use of closure devices in interventional radiology. METHODS: The CIRSE registry of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reekers, Jim A., Müller-Hülsbeck, Stefan, Libicher, Martin, Atar, Eli, Trentmann, Jens, Goffette, Pierre, Borggrefe, Jan, Zeleňák, Kamil, Hooijboer, Pieter, Belli, Anna-Maria
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20981425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-0004-y
_version_ 1782196282543046656
author Reekers, Jim A.
Müller-Hülsbeck, Stefan
Libicher, Martin
Atar, Eli
Trentmann, Jens
Goffette, Pierre
Borggrefe, Jan
Zeleňák, Kamil
Hooijboer, Pieter
Belli, Anna-Maria
author_facet Reekers, Jim A.
Müller-Hülsbeck, Stefan
Libicher, Martin
Atar, Eli
Trentmann, Jens
Goffette, Pierre
Borggrefe, Jan
Zeleňák, Kamil
Hooijboer, Pieter
Belli, Anna-Maria
author_sort Reekers, Jim A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Vascular closure devices are routinely used after many vascular interventional radiology procedures. However, there have been no major multicenter studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of the routine use of closure devices in interventional radiology. METHODS: The CIRSE registry of closure devices with an anchor and a plug started in January 2009 and ended in August 2009. A total of 1,107 patients were included in the registry. RESULTS: Deployment success was 97.2%. Deployment failure specified to access type was 8.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.0–14.5] for antegrade access and 1.8% (95% CI 1.1–2.9) for retrograde access (P = 0.001). There was no difference in deployment failure related to local PVD at the access site. Calcification was a reason for deployment failure in only <0.5% of patients. Postdeployment bleeding occurred in 6.4%, and most these (51.5%) could be managed with light manual compression. During follow-up, other device-related complications were reported in 1.3%: seven false aneurysms, three hematoma >5.9 cm, and two vessel occlusions. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this registry of closure devices with an anchor and a plug is that the use of this device in interventional radiology procedures is safe, with a low incidence of serious access site complications. There seems to be no difference in complications between antegrade and retrograde access and other parameters.
format Text
id pubmed-3020296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30202962011-02-22 CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry Reekers, Jim A. Müller-Hülsbeck, Stefan Libicher, Martin Atar, Eli Trentmann, Jens Goffette, Pierre Borggrefe, Jan Zeleňák, Kamil Hooijboer, Pieter Belli, Anna-Maria Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: Vascular closure devices are routinely used after many vascular interventional radiology procedures. However, there have been no major multicenter studies to assess the safety and effectiveness of the routine use of closure devices in interventional radiology. METHODS: The CIRSE registry of closure devices with an anchor and a plug started in January 2009 and ended in August 2009. A total of 1,107 patients were included in the registry. RESULTS: Deployment success was 97.2%. Deployment failure specified to access type was 8.8% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5.0–14.5] for antegrade access and 1.8% (95% CI 1.1–2.9) for retrograde access (P = 0.001). There was no difference in deployment failure related to local PVD at the access site. Calcification was a reason for deployment failure in only <0.5% of patients. Postdeployment bleeding occurred in 6.4%, and most these (51.5%) could be managed with light manual compression. During follow-up, other device-related complications were reported in 1.3%: seven false aneurysms, three hematoma >5.9 cm, and two vessel occlusions. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this registry of closure devices with an anchor and a plug is that the use of this device in interventional radiology procedures is safe, with a low incidence of serious access site complications. There seems to be no difference in complications between antegrade and retrograde access and other parameters. Springer-Verlag 2010-10-28 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3020296/ /pubmed/20981425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-0004-y Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Reekers, Jim A.
Müller-Hülsbeck, Stefan
Libicher, Martin
Atar, Eli
Trentmann, Jens
Goffette, Pierre
Borggrefe, Jan
Zeleňák, Kamil
Hooijboer, Pieter
Belli, Anna-Maria
CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry
title CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry
title_full CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry
title_fullStr CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry
title_full_unstemmed CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry
title_short CIRSE Vascular Closure Device Registry
title_sort cirse vascular closure device registry
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20981425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-0004-y
work_keys_str_mv AT reekersjima cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT mullerhulsbeckstefan cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT libichermartin cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT atareli cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT trentmannjens cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT goffettepierre cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT borggrefejan cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT zelenakkamil cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT hooijboerpieter cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry
AT belliannamaria cirsevascularclosuredeviceregistry