Cargando…

Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster

Memory performance depends not only on effective learning and storage of information, but also on its efficient retrieval. In Drosophila, aversive olfactory conditioning generates qualitatively different forms of memory depending on the number and spacing of conditioning trials. However, it is not k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chabaud, Marie-Ange, Preat, Thomas, Kaiser, Laure
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00192
_version_ 1782196303918268416
author Chabaud, Marie-Ange
Preat, Thomas
Kaiser, Laure
author_facet Chabaud, Marie-Ange
Preat, Thomas
Kaiser, Laure
author_sort Chabaud, Marie-Ange
collection PubMed
description Memory performance depends not only on effective learning and storage of information, but also on its efficient retrieval. In Drosophila, aversive olfactory conditioning generates qualitatively different forms of memory depending on the number and spacing of conditioning trials. However, it is not known how these differences are reflected at the retrieval level, in the behavior of individual flies during testing. We analyzed conditioned behaviors after one conditioning trial and after massed and spaced repeated trials. The single conditioning produces an early memory that was tested at 1.5 h. Tested at 24 h after training, the spaced and the massed protocols generate two different forms of consolidated memory, dependent, or independent of de novo protein-synthesis. We found clearly distinct patterns of locomotor activity in flies trained with either spaced or massed conditioning protocols. Spaced-trained flies exhibited immediate and dynamic choices between punished and unpunished odors during the test, whereas massed-trained flies made a delayed choice and showed earlier disappearance of the conditioned response. Flies trained with single and spaced trials responded to the punished odor by decreasing their resting time, but not massed-trained flies. These findings demonstrate that genetically and pharmacologically distinct forms of memory drive characteristically different forms of locomotor behavior during retrieval, and they may shed light on our previous observation that memory retrieval in massed-trained flies is socially facilitated. Social interactions would enhance exploratory activity, and then reduce the latency of their conditioned choice and delay its extinction.
format Text
id pubmed-3020398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30203982011-01-21 Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster Chabaud, Marie-Ange Preat, Thomas Kaiser, Laure Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Memory performance depends not only on effective learning and storage of information, but also on its efficient retrieval. In Drosophila, aversive olfactory conditioning generates qualitatively different forms of memory depending on the number and spacing of conditioning trials. However, it is not known how these differences are reflected at the retrieval level, in the behavior of individual flies during testing. We analyzed conditioned behaviors after one conditioning trial and after massed and spaced repeated trials. The single conditioning produces an early memory that was tested at 1.5 h. Tested at 24 h after training, the spaced and the massed protocols generate two different forms of consolidated memory, dependent, or independent of de novo protein-synthesis. We found clearly distinct patterns of locomotor activity in flies trained with either spaced or massed conditioning protocols. Spaced-trained flies exhibited immediate and dynamic choices between punished and unpunished odors during the test, whereas massed-trained flies made a delayed choice and showed earlier disappearance of the conditioned response. Flies trained with single and spaced trials responded to the punished odor by decreasing their resting time, but not massed-trained flies. These findings demonstrate that genetically and pharmacologically distinct forms of memory drive characteristically different forms of locomotor behavior during retrieval, and they may shed light on our previous observation that memory retrieval in massed-trained flies is socially facilitated. Social interactions would enhance exploratory activity, and then reduce the latency of their conditioned choice and delay its extinction. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3020398/ /pubmed/21258642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00192 Text en Copyright © 2010 Chabaud, Preat and Kaiser. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Chabaud, Marie-Ange
Preat, Thomas
Kaiser, Laure
Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster
title Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster
title_full Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster
title_fullStr Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster
title_short Behavioral Characterization of Individual Olfactory Memory Retrieval in Drosophila Melanogaster
title_sort behavioral characterization of individual olfactory memory retrieval in drosophila melanogaster
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00192
work_keys_str_mv AT chabaudmarieange behavioralcharacterizationofindividualolfactorymemoryretrievalindrosophilamelanogaster
AT preatthomas behavioralcharacterizationofindividualolfactorymemoryretrievalindrosophilamelanogaster
AT kaiserlaure behavioralcharacterizationofindividualolfactorymemoryretrievalindrosophilamelanogaster