Cargando…

Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys

BACKGROUND: The transition from medical student to junior doctor in postgraduate training is a critical stage in career progression. We report junior doctors' views about the extent to which their medical school prepared them for their work in clinical practice. METHODS: Postal questionnaires w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldacre, Michael J, Taylor, Kathryn, Lambert, Trevor W
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21070622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-78
_version_ 1782196317604282368
author Goldacre, Michael J
Taylor, Kathryn
Lambert, Trevor W
author_facet Goldacre, Michael J
Taylor, Kathryn
Lambert, Trevor W
author_sort Goldacre, Michael J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The transition from medical student to junior doctor in postgraduate training is a critical stage in career progression. We report junior doctors' views about the extent to which their medical school prepared them for their work in clinical practice. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were used to survey the medical graduates of 1999, 2000, 2002 and 2005, from all UK medical schools, one year after graduation, and graduates of 2000, 2002 and 2005 three years after graduation. Summary statistics, chi-squared tests, and binary logistic regression were used to analyse the results. The main outcome measure was the level of agreement that medical school had prepared the responder well for work. RESULTS: Response rate was 63.7% (11610/18216) in year one and 60.2% (8427/13997) in year three. One year after graduation, 36.3% (95% CI: 34.6, 38.0) of 1999/2000 graduates, 50.3% (48.5, 52.2) of 2002 graduates, and 58.2% (56.5, 59.9) of 2005 graduates agreed their medical school had prepared them well. Conversely, in year three agreement fell from 48.9% (47.1, 50.7) to 38.0% (36.0, 40.0) to 28.0% (26.2, 29.7). Combining cohorts at year one, percentages who agreed that they had been well prepared ranged from 82% (95% CI: 79-87) at the medical school with the highest level of agreement to 30% (25-35) at the lowest. At year three the range was 70% to 27%. Ethnicity and sex were partial predictors of doctors' level of agreement; following adjustment for them, substantial differences between schools remained. In years one and three, 30% and 34% of doctors specified that feeling unprepared had been a serious or medium-sized problem for them (only 3% in each year regarded it as serious). CONCLUSIONS: The vast knowledge base of clinical practice makes full preparation impossible. Our statement about feeling prepared is simple yet discriminating and identified some substantial differences between medical schools. Medical schools need feedback from graduates about elements of training that could be improved.
format Text
id pubmed-3020650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30206502011-01-14 Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys Goldacre, Michael J Taylor, Kathryn Lambert, Trevor W BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The transition from medical student to junior doctor in postgraduate training is a critical stage in career progression. We report junior doctors' views about the extent to which their medical school prepared them for their work in clinical practice. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were used to survey the medical graduates of 1999, 2000, 2002 and 2005, from all UK medical schools, one year after graduation, and graduates of 2000, 2002 and 2005 three years after graduation. Summary statistics, chi-squared tests, and binary logistic regression were used to analyse the results. The main outcome measure was the level of agreement that medical school had prepared the responder well for work. RESULTS: Response rate was 63.7% (11610/18216) in year one and 60.2% (8427/13997) in year three. One year after graduation, 36.3% (95% CI: 34.6, 38.0) of 1999/2000 graduates, 50.3% (48.5, 52.2) of 2002 graduates, and 58.2% (56.5, 59.9) of 2005 graduates agreed their medical school had prepared them well. Conversely, in year three agreement fell from 48.9% (47.1, 50.7) to 38.0% (36.0, 40.0) to 28.0% (26.2, 29.7). Combining cohorts at year one, percentages who agreed that they had been well prepared ranged from 82% (95% CI: 79-87) at the medical school with the highest level of agreement to 30% (25-35) at the lowest. At year three the range was 70% to 27%. Ethnicity and sex were partial predictors of doctors' level of agreement; following adjustment for them, substantial differences between schools remained. In years one and three, 30% and 34% of doctors specified that feeling unprepared had been a serious or medium-sized problem for them (only 3% in each year regarded it as serious). CONCLUSIONS: The vast knowledge base of clinical practice makes full preparation impossible. Our statement about feeling prepared is simple yet discriminating and identified some substantial differences between medical schools. Medical schools need feedback from graduates about elements of training that could be improved. BioMed Central 2010-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3020650/ /pubmed/21070622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-78 Text en Copyright ©2010 Goldacre et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goldacre, Michael J
Taylor, Kathryn
Lambert, Trevor W
Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys
title Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys
title_full Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys
title_fullStr Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys
title_full_unstemmed Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys
title_short Views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys
title_sort views of junior doctors about whether their medical school prepared them well for work: questionnaire surveys
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21070622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-78
work_keys_str_mv AT goldacremichaelj viewsofjuniordoctorsaboutwhethertheirmedicalschoolpreparedthemwellforworkquestionnairesurveys
AT taylorkathryn viewsofjuniordoctorsaboutwhethertheirmedicalschoolpreparedthemwellforworkquestionnairesurveys
AT lamberttrevorw viewsofjuniordoctorsaboutwhethertheirmedicalschoolpreparedthemwellforworkquestionnairesurveys