Cargando…

Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization

The electrosense of sharks and rays is used to detect weak dipole-like bioelectric fields of prey, mates and predators, and several models propose a use for the detection of streaming ocean currents and swimming-induced fields for geomagnetic orientation. We assessed pore distributions, canal vector...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivera-Vicente, Ariel C., Sewell, Josiah, Tricas, Timothy C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21249147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016008
_version_ 1782196341459386368
author Rivera-Vicente, Ariel C.
Sewell, Josiah
Tricas, Timothy C.
author_facet Rivera-Vicente, Ariel C.
Sewell, Josiah
Tricas, Timothy C.
author_sort Rivera-Vicente, Ariel C.
collection PubMed
description The electrosense of sharks and rays is used to detect weak dipole-like bioelectric fields of prey, mates and predators, and several models propose a use for the detection of streaming ocean currents and swimming-induced fields for geomagnetic orientation. We assessed pore distributions, canal vectors, complementarity and possible evolutionary divergent functions for ampullary clusters in two sharks, the scalloped hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini) and the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus), and the brown stingray (Dasyatis lata). Canal projections were determined from measured coordinates of each electrosensory pore and corresponding ampulla relative to the body axis. These species share three ampullary groups: the buccal (BUC), mandibular (MAN) and superficial ophthalmic (SO), which is subdivided into anterior (SOa) and posterior (SOp) in sharks. The stingray also has a hyoid (HYO) cluster. The SOp in both sharks contains the longest (most sensitive) canals with main projections in the posterior-lateral quadrants of the horizontal plane. In contrast, stingray SO canals are few and short with the posterior-lateral projections subsumed by the HYO. There was strong projection coincidence by BUC and SOp canals in the posterior lateral quadrant of the hammerhead shark, and laterally among the stingray BUC and HYO. The shark SOa and stingray SO and BUC contain short canals located anterior to the mouth for detection of prey at close distance. The MAN canals of all species project in anterior or posterior directions behind the mouth and likely coordinate prey capture. Vertical elevation was greatest in the BUC of the sandbar shark, restricted by the hammerhead cephalofoil and extremely limited in the dorsoventrally flattened stingray. These results are consistent with the functional subunit hypothesis that predicts specialized ampullary functions for processing of weak dipole and geomagnetic induced fields, and provides an anatomical basis for future experiments on central processing of different forms of relevant electric stimuli.
format Text
id pubmed-3020962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30209622011-01-19 Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization Rivera-Vicente, Ariel C. Sewell, Josiah Tricas, Timothy C. PLoS One Research Article The electrosense of sharks and rays is used to detect weak dipole-like bioelectric fields of prey, mates and predators, and several models propose a use for the detection of streaming ocean currents and swimming-induced fields for geomagnetic orientation. We assessed pore distributions, canal vectors, complementarity and possible evolutionary divergent functions for ampullary clusters in two sharks, the scalloped hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini) and the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus), and the brown stingray (Dasyatis lata). Canal projections were determined from measured coordinates of each electrosensory pore and corresponding ampulla relative to the body axis. These species share three ampullary groups: the buccal (BUC), mandibular (MAN) and superficial ophthalmic (SO), which is subdivided into anterior (SOa) and posterior (SOp) in sharks. The stingray also has a hyoid (HYO) cluster. The SOp in both sharks contains the longest (most sensitive) canals with main projections in the posterior-lateral quadrants of the horizontal plane. In contrast, stingray SO canals are few and short with the posterior-lateral projections subsumed by the HYO. There was strong projection coincidence by BUC and SOp canals in the posterior lateral quadrant of the hammerhead shark, and laterally among the stingray BUC and HYO. The shark SOa and stingray SO and BUC contain short canals located anterior to the mouth for detection of prey at close distance. The MAN canals of all species project in anterior or posterior directions behind the mouth and likely coordinate prey capture. Vertical elevation was greatest in the BUC of the sandbar shark, restricted by the hammerhead cephalofoil and extremely limited in the dorsoventrally flattened stingray. These results are consistent with the functional subunit hypothesis that predicts specialized ampullary functions for processing of weak dipole and geomagnetic induced fields, and provides an anatomical basis for future experiments on central processing of different forms of relevant electric stimuli. Public Library of Science 2011-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3020962/ /pubmed/21249147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016008 Text en Rivera-Vicente et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rivera-Vicente, Ariel C.
Sewell, Josiah
Tricas, Timothy C.
Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization
title Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization
title_full Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization
title_fullStr Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization
title_full_unstemmed Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization
title_short Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization
title_sort electrosensitive spatial vectors in elasmobranch fishes: implications for source localization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3020962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21249147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016008
work_keys_str_mv AT riveravicentearielc electrosensitivespatialvectorsinelasmobranchfishesimplicationsforsourcelocalization
AT sewelljosiah electrosensitivespatialvectorsinelasmobranchfishesimplicationsforsourcelocalization
AT tricastimothyc electrosensitivespatialvectorsinelasmobranchfishesimplicationsforsourcelocalization