Cargando…

Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila

BACKGROUND: One of the important goals in the post-genomic era is to determine the regulatory elements within the non-coding DNA of a given organism's genome. The identification of functional cis-regulatory modules has proven difficult since the component factor binding sites are small and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emberly, Eldon, Rajewsky, Nikolaus, Siggia, Eric D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC302112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14629780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-57
_version_ 1782121093271650304
author Emberly, Eldon
Rajewsky, Nikolaus
Siggia, Eric D
author_facet Emberly, Eldon
Rajewsky, Nikolaus
Siggia, Eric D
author_sort Emberly, Eldon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the important goals in the post-genomic era is to determine the regulatory elements within the non-coding DNA of a given organism's genome. The identification of functional cis-regulatory modules has proven difficult since the component factor binding sites are small and the rules governing their arrangement are poorly understood. However, the genomes of suitably diverged species help to predict regulatory elements based on the generally accepted assumption that conserved blocks of genomic sequence are likely to be functional. To judge the efficacy of strategies that prefilter by sequence conservation it is important to know to what extent the converse assumption holds, namely that functional elements common to both species will fall within these conserved blocks. The recently completed sequence of a second Drosophila species provides an opportunity to test this assumption for one of the experimentally best studied regulatory networks in multicellular organisms, the body patterning of the fly embryo. RESULTS: We find that 50%–70% of known binding sites reside in conserved sequence blocks, but these percentages are not greatly enriched over what is expected by chance. Finally, a computational genome-wide search in both species for regulatory modules based on clusters of binding sites suggests that genes central to the regulatory network are consistently recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that binding sites remain clustered for these "core modules" while not necessarily residing in conserved blocks. This is an important clue as to how regulatory information is encoded in the genome and how modules evolve.
format Text
id pubmed-302112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-3021122003-12-30 Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila Emberly, Eldon Rajewsky, Nikolaus Siggia, Eric D BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: One of the important goals in the post-genomic era is to determine the regulatory elements within the non-coding DNA of a given organism's genome. The identification of functional cis-regulatory modules has proven difficult since the component factor binding sites are small and the rules governing their arrangement are poorly understood. However, the genomes of suitably diverged species help to predict regulatory elements based on the generally accepted assumption that conserved blocks of genomic sequence are likely to be functional. To judge the efficacy of strategies that prefilter by sequence conservation it is important to know to what extent the converse assumption holds, namely that functional elements common to both species will fall within these conserved blocks. The recently completed sequence of a second Drosophila species provides an opportunity to test this assumption for one of the experimentally best studied regulatory networks in multicellular organisms, the body patterning of the fly embryo. RESULTS: We find that 50%–70% of known binding sites reside in conserved sequence blocks, but these percentages are not greatly enriched over what is expected by chance. Finally, a computational genome-wide search in both species for regulatory modules based on clusters of binding sites suggests that genes central to the regulatory network are consistently recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that binding sites remain clustered for these "core modules" while not necessarily residing in conserved blocks. This is an important clue as to how regulatory information is encoded in the genome and how modules evolve. BioMed Central 2003-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC302112/ /pubmed/14629780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-57 Text en Copyright © 2003 Emberly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Emberly, Eldon
Rajewsky, Nikolaus
Siggia, Eric D
Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila
title Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila
title_full Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila
title_fullStr Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila
title_short Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila
title_sort conservation of regulatory elements between two species of drosophila
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC302112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14629780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-57
work_keys_str_mv AT emberlyeldon conservationofregulatoryelementsbetweentwospeciesofdrosophila
AT rajewskynikolaus conservationofregulatoryelementsbetweentwospeciesofdrosophila
AT siggiaericd conservationofregulatoryelementsbetweentwospeciesofdrosophila