Cargando…
Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most common way of placing a feeding tube. Sometimes PEG cannot be used to safely place a feeding tube, most commonly secondary to an inability to transilluminate the abdominal wall. Whereas open gastrostomy was previously necessary in suc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3021284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20529530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12674612014662 |
_version_ | 1782196361917104128 |
---|---|
author | Lopes, Gustavo Salcone, Mark Neff, Marc |
author_facet | Lopes, Gustavo Salcone, Mark Neff, Marc |
author_sort | Lopes, Gustavo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most common way of placing a feeding tube. Sometimes PEG cannot be used to safely place a feeding tube, most commonly secondary to an inability to transilluminate the abdominal wall. Whereas open gastrostomy was previously necessary in such cases, laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) is a viable option and is reviewed here. METHODS: All patients referred for surgical feeding tube placement after unsuccessful PEG were considered for LAPEG. A diagnostic laparoscopy was performed to identify the reason for the failed PEG attempt. Additional ports were placed as needed for the retraction of organs and lysis of adhesions. The stomach was visualized, and the PEG was placed. RESULTS: Eight patients who underwent an unsuccessful PEG were taken to the operating room for LAPEG. All patients had successful LAPEG placement. No postoperative complications occurred. The most common reason identified for failed PEG attempt was adhesions followed by overlying organs. Average OR time was 32 minutes. CONCLUSION: When conventional PEG placement is not possible, LAPEG placement should be considered as a time efficient, minimally invasive alternative to open gastrostomy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3021284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30212842011-02-17 Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement Lopes, Gustavo Salcone, Mark Neff, Marc JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most common way of placing a feeding tube. Sometimes PEG cannot be used to safely place a feeding tube, most commonly secondary to an inability to transilluminate the abdominal wall. Whereas open gastrostomy was previously necessary in such cases, laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) is a viable option and is reviewed here. METHODS: All patients referred for surgical feeding tube placement after unsuccessful PEG were considered for LAPEG. A diagnostic laparoscopy was performed to identify the reason for the failed PEG attempt. Additional ports were placed as needed for the retraction of organs and lysis of adhesions. The stomach was visualized, and the PEG was placed. RESULTS: Eight patients who underwent an unsuccessful PEG were taken to the operating room for LAPEG. All patients had successful LAPEG placement. No postoperative complications occurred. The most common reason identified for failed PEG attempt was adhesions followed by overlying organs. Average OR time was 32 minutes. CONCLUSION: When conventional PEG placement is not possible, LAPEG placement should be considered as a time efficient, minimally invasive alternative to open gastrostomy. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3021284/ /pubmed/20529530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12674612014662 Text en © 2010 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Lopes, Gustavo Salcone, Mark Neff, Marc Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement |
title | Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement |
title_full | Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement |
title_short | Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement |
title_sort | laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3021284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20529530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12674612014662 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopesgustavo laparoscopicassistedpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubeplacement AT salconemark laparoscopicassistedpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubeplacement AT neffmarc laparoscopicassistedpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubeplacement |