Cargando…
Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sano...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 |
_version_ | 1782196467927089152 |
---|---|
author | Andriesse, G. I. Elberts, S. Vrolijk, A. Verhulst, C. Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. |
author_facet | Andriesse, G. I. Elberts, S. Vrolijk, A. Verhulst, C. Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. |
author_sort | Andriesse, G. I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (“strain study”). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (“daily practice study”). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3022149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30221492011-02-22 Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus Andriesse, G. I. Elberts, S. Vrolijk, A. Verhulst, C. Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Article In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (“strain study”). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (“daily practice study”). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays. Springer-Verlag 2010-10-13 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3022149/ /pubmed/20941519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Andriesse, G. I. Elberts, S. Vrolijk, A. Verhulst, C. Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus |
title | Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus |
title_full | Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus |
title_short | Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus |
title_sort | evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of staphylococcus aureus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andriessegi evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus AT elbertss evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus AT vrolijka evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus AT verhulstc evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus AT kluytmansjajw evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus |