Cargando…

Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus

 In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sano...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andriesse, G. I., Elberts, S., Vrolijk, A., Verhulst, C., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
_version_ 1782196467927089152
author Andriesse, G. I.
Elberts, S.
Vrolijk, A.
Verhulst, C.
Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
author_facet Andriesse, G. I.
Elberts, S.
Vrolijk, A.
Verhulst, C.
Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
author_sort Andriesse, G. I.
collection PubMed
description  In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (“strain study”). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (“daily practice study”). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays.
format Text
id pubmed-3022149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30221492011-02-22 Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus Andriesse, G. I. Elberts, S. Vrolijk, A. Verhulst, C. Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Article  In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (“strain study”). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (“daily practice study”). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays. Springer-Verlag 2010-10-13 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3022149/ /pubmed/20941519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Andriesse, G. I.
Elberts, S.
Vrolijk, A.
Verhulst, C.
Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_full Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_short Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of staphylococcus aureus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
work_keys_str_mv AT andriessegi evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus
AT elbertss evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus
AT vrolijka evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus
AT verhulstc evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus
AT kluytmansjajw evaluationofafourthgenerationlatexagglutinationtestfortheidentificationofstaphylococcusaureus