Cargando…

Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review

Background/Aim. Dietary glycemic index (GI) has received considerable research interest over the past 25 years although its application to pregnancy outcomes is more recent. This paper critically evaluates the current evidence regarding the effect of dietary GI on maternal and fetal nutrition. Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu, Brand-Miller, Jennie C., Markovic, Tania P., Ross, Glynis P., Moses, Robert G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21253478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/282464
_version_ 1782196480669384704
author Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu
Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
Markovic, Tania P.
Ross, Glynis P.
Moses, Robert G.
author_facet Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu
Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
Markovic, Tania P.
Ross, Glynis P.
Moses, Robert G.
author_sort Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu
collection PubMed
description Background/Aim. Dietary glycemic index (GI) has received considerable research interest over the past 25 years although its application to pregnancy outcomes is more recent. This paper critically evaluates the current evidence regarding the effect of dietary GI on maternal and fetal nutrition. Methods. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Science, from 1980 through September 2010, was conducted. Results. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Two interventional studies suggest that a low-GI diet can reduce the risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in healthy pregnancies, but one epidemiological study reported an increase in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants. Evidence in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), though limited (n = 3), consistently supports the advantages of a low-GI diet. Conclusion. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a low-GI diet during normal pregnancy. In pregnancy complicated by GDM, a low-GI diet may reduce the need for insulin without adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. Until larger-scale intervention trials are completed, a low-GI diet should not replace the current recommended pregnancy diets from government and health agencies. Further research regarding the optimal time to start a low-GI diet for maximum protection against adverse pregnancy outcomes is warranted.
format Text
id pubmed-3022194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30221942011-01-20 Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Markovic, Tania P. Ross, Glynis P. Moses, Robert G. J Nutr Metab Review Article Background/Aim. Dietary glycemic index (GI) has received considerable research interest over the past 25 years although its application to pregnancy outcomes is more recent. This paper critically evaluates the current evidence regarding the effect of dietary GI on maternal and fetal nutrition. Methods. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Science, from 1980 through September 2010, was conducted. Results. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Two interventional studies suggest that a low-GI diet can reduce the risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in healthy pregnancies, but one epidemiological study reported an increase in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants. Evidence in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), though limited (n = 3), consistently supports the advantages of a low-GI diet. Conclusion. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a low-GI diet during normal pregnancy. In pregnancy complicated by GDM, a low-GI diet may reduce the need for insulin without adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. Until larger-scale intervention trials are completed, a low-GI diet should not replace the current recommended pregnancy diets from government and health agencies. Further research regarding the optimal time to start a low-GI diet for maximum protection against adverse pregnancy outcomes is warranted. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2011-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3022194/ /pubmed/21253478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/282464 Text en Copyright © 2010 Jimmy Chun Yu Louie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu
Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
Markovic, Tania P.
Ross, Glynis P.
Moses, Robert G.
Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review
title Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort glycemic index and pregnancy: a systematic literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21253478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/282464
work_keys_str_mv AT louiejimmychunyu glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview
AT brandmillerjenniec glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview
AT markovictaniap glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview
AT rossglynisp glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview
AT mosesrobertg glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview