Cargando…
Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review
Background/Aim. Dietary glycemic index (GI) has received considerable research interest over the past 25 years although its application to pregnancy outcomes is more recent. This paper critically evaluates the current evidence regarding the effect of dietary GI on maternal and fetal nutrition. Metho...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21253478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/282464 |
_version_ | 1782196480669384704 |
---|---|
author | Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Markovic, Tania P. Ross, Glynis P. Moses, Robert G. |
author_facet | Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Markovic, Tania P. Ross, Glynis P. Moses, Robert G. |
author_sort | Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background/Aim. Dietary glycemic index (GI) has received considerable research interest over the past 25 years although its application to pregnancy outcomes is more recent. This paper critically evaluates the current evidence regarding the effect of dietary GI on maternal and fetal nutrition. Methods. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Science, from 1980 through September 2010, was conducted. Results. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Two interventional studies suggest that a low-GI diet can reduce the risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in healthy pregnancies, but one epidemiological study reported an increase in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants. Evidence in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), though limited (n = 3), consistently supports the advantages of a low-GI diet. Conclusion. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a low-GI diet during normal pregnancy. In pregnancy complicated by GDM, a low-GI diet may reduce the need for insulin without adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. Until larger-scale intervention trials are completed, a low-GI diet should not replace the current recommended pregnancy diets from government and health agencies. Further research regarding the optimal time to start a low-GI diet for maximum protection against adverse pregnancy outcomes is warranted. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3022194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30221942011-01-20 Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Markovic, Tania P. Ross, Glynis P. Moses, Robert G. J Nutr Metab Review Article Background/Aim. Dietary glycemic index (GI) has received considerable research interest over the past 25 years although its application to pregnancy outcomes is more recent. This paper critically evaluates the current evidence regarding the effect of dietary GI on maternal and fetal nutrition. Methods. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and ISI Web of Science, from 1980 through September 2010, was conducted. Results. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. Two interventional studies suggest that a low-GI diet can reduce the risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in healthy pregnancies, but one epidemiological study reported an increase in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants. Evidence in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), though limited (n = 3), consistently supports the advantages of a low-GI diet. Conclusion. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a low-GI diet during normal pregnancy. In pregnancy complicated by GDM, a low-GI diet may reduce the need for insulin without adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. Until larger-scale intervention trials are completed, a low-GI diet should not replace the current recommended pregnancy diets from government and health agencies. Further research regarding the optimal time to start a low-GI diet for maximum protection against adverse pregnancy outcomes is warranted. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2011-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3022194/ /pubmed/21253478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/282464 Text en Copyright © 2010 Jimmy Chun Yu Louie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu Brand-Miller, Jennie C. Markovic, Tania P. Ross, Glynis P. Moses, Robert G. Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review |
title | Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | Glycemic Index and Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | glycemic index and pregnancy: a systematic literature review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21253478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/282464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT louiejimmychunyu glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview AT brandmillerjenniec glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview AT markovictaniap glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview AT rossglynisp glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview AT mosesrobertg glycemicindexandpregnancyasystematicliteraturereview |