Cargando…

Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY)

BACKGROUND: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are considered important outcomes because they reflect the patient's experience in clinical trials. PROs have been included in the field of haemophilia only recently. PURPOSE: Comparing the contents of PROs measures used in haemophilia, based on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riva, Silvia, Bullinger, Monika, Amann, Edda, von Mackensen, Sylvia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21108796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-139
_version_ 1782196519323041792
author Riva, Silvia
Bullinger, Monika
Amann, Edda
von Mackensen, Sylvia
author_facet Riva, Silvia
Bullinger, Monika
Amann, Edda
von Mackensen, Sylvia
author_sort Riva, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are considered important outcomes because they reflect the patient's experience in clinical trials. PROs have been included in the field of haemophilia only recently. PURPOSE: Comparing the contents of PROs measures used in haemophilia, based on the ICF/ICF-CY as frame of reference. METHODS: Haemophilia-specific PROs for adults and children were selected on the grounds of international accessibility. The content of the selected instruments were examined by linking the concepts within the items of these instruments to the ICF/ICF-CY. RESULTS: Within the 5 selected instruments 365 concepts were identified, of which 283 concepts were linked to the ICF/ICF CY and mapped into 70 different categories. The most frequently used categories were "b152: Emotional functions" and "e1101: Drugs". CONCLUSIONS: The present paper provides an overview on current PROs in haemophilia and facilitates the selection of appropriate instruments for specific purposes in clinical and research settings. This work was made possible by the grant of the European Murinet Project (Multidisciplinary Research Network on Health and Disability in Europe).
format Text
id pubmed-3022566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30225662011-01-19 Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY) Riva, Silvia Bullinger, Monika Amann, Edda von Mackensen, Sylvia Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are considered important outcomes because they reflect the patient's experience in clinical trials. PROs have been included in the field of haemophilia only recently. PURPOSE: Comparing the contents of PROs measures used in haemophilia, based on the ICF/ICF-CY as frame of reference. METHODS: Haemophilia-specific PROs for adults and children were selected on the grounds of international accessibility. The content of the selected instruments were examined by linking the concepts within the items of these instruments to the ICF/ICF-CY. RESULTS: Within the 5 selected instruments 365 concepts were identified, of which 283 concepts were linked to the ICF/ICF CY and mapped into 70 different categories. The most frequently used categories were "b152: Emotional functions" and "e1101: Drugs". CONCLUSIONS: The present paper provides an overview on current PROs in haemophilia and facilitates the selection of appropriate instruments for specific purposes in clinical and research settings. This work was made possible by the grant of the European Murinet Project (Multidisciplinary Research Network on Health and Disability in Europe). BioMed Central 2010-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3022566/ /pubmed/21108796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-139 Text en Copyright ©2010 Riva et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Riva, Silvia
Bullinger, Monika
Amann, Edda
von Mackensen, Sylvia
Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY)
title Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY)
title_full Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY)
title_fullStr Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY)
title_full_unstemmed Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY)
title_short Content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF, ICF-CY)
title_sort content comparison of haemophilia specific patient-rated outcome measures with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (icf, icf-cy)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21108796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-139
work_keys_str_mv AT rivasilvia contentcomparisonofhaemophiliaspecificpatientratedoutcomemeasureswiththeinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicficfcy
AT bullingermonika contentcomparisonofhaemophiliaspecificpatientratedoutcomemeasureswiththeinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicficfcy
AT amannedda contentcomparisonofhaemophiliaspecificpatientratedoutcomemeasureswiththeinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicficfcy
AT vonmackensensylvia contentcomparisonofhaemophiliaspecificpatientratedoutcomemeasureswiththeinternationalclassificationoffunctioningdisabilityandhealthicficfcy