Cargando…

Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?

BACKGROUND: There is no data documenting the existence of a risk of infection transmission in ambulatory healthcare settings but concern remains. Our objective was to determine the risk of infection associated to a pediatric Emergency Department (ED) visit and the predictors of infection in children...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quach, Caroline, Moore, Dorothy, Ducharme, Francine, Chalut, Dominic
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21214927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-2
_version_ 1782196567480991744
author Quach, Caroline
Moore, Dorothy
Ducharme, Francine
Chalut, Dominic
author_facet Quach, Caroline
Moore, Dorothy
Ducharme, Francine
Chalut, Dominic
author_sort Quach, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is no data documenting the existence of a risk of infection transmission in ambulatory healthcare settings but concern remains. Our objective was to determine the risk of infection associated to a pediatric Emergency Department (ED) visit and the predictors of infection in children aged 5 years and less. METHODS: Children aged 5 years and less with an ED visit between February and April of a non pandemic season were recruited and followed-up by telephone interviews to ascertain the development of new respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. Approximately half of the parents were called 7-10 days after their child's ED visit. The other half were called at least 14 days after the visit and served as the ED-unexposed group. The principal outcome was the onset of a new infection in the week preceding the phone interview, using standardized definitions. Proportions of children with new infections were calculated in both groups and logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 304 children (mean age 2.4 years) were followed. Of the 137 children with a recent ED visit, 21 (15.3%) developed an infection compared to 39 of 167 (23.4%) of those without a recent visit. The relative risk (RR) associated with ED exposure was 0.7 (95%CI 0.4-1.1). As 85 children with a recent ED visit presented to the ED with a viral infection, we repeated the analysis excluding them to improve our capacity to detect new infections: 9 children (17.3%) developed an infection (RR = 0.7 [95%CI 0.4-1.4]). The only factor associated with an increased risk of infection was an intra-familial infectious contact (RR 9.9; 95%CI 1.7-58.9). CONCLUSION: A visit to a pediatric ED does not result in a detectable increased risk of infection above the risk in the community. This is likely explained by the high baseline risk of infections in young children. However, we cannot eliminate the possibility that a risk of infection may still exist and would warrant a larger study to document.
format Text
id pubmed-3022741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30227412011-01-19 Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection? Quach, Caroline Moore, Dorothy Ducharme, Francine Chalut, Dominic BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: There is no data documenting the existence of a risk of infection transmission in ambulatory healthcare settings but concern remains. Our objective was to determine the risk of infection associated to a pediatric Emergency Department (ED) visit and the predictors of infection in children aged 5 years and less. METHODS: Children aged 5 years and less with an ED visit between February and April of a non pandemic season were recruited and followed-up by telephone interviews to ascertain the development of new respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. Approximately half of the parents were called 7-10 days after their child's ED visit. The other half were called at least 14 days after the visit and served as the ED-unexposed group. The principal outcome was the onset of a new infection in the week preceding the phone interview, using standardized definitions. Proportions of children with new infections were calculated in both groups and logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 304 children (mean age 2.4 years) were followed. Of the 137 children with a recent ED visit, 21 (15.3%) developed an infection compared to 39 of 167 (23.4%) of those without a recent visit. The relative risk (RR) associated with ED exposure was 0.7 (95%CI 0.4-1.1). As 85 children with a recent ED visit presented to the ED with a viral infection, we repeated the analysis excluding them to improve our capacity to detect new infections: 9 children (17.3%) developed an infection (RR = 0.7 [95%CI 0.4-1.4]). The only factor associated with an increased risk of infection was an intra-familial infectious contact (RR 9.9; 95%CI 1.7-58.9). CONCLUSION: A visit to a pediatric ED does not result in a detectable increased risk of infection above the risk in the community. This is likely explained by the high baseline risk of infections in young children. However, we cannot eliminate the possibility that a risk of infection may still exist and would warrant a larger study to document. BioMed Central 2011-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3022741/ /pubmed/21214927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-2 Text en Copyright ©2011 Quach et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quach, Caroline
Moore, Dorothy
Ducharme, Francine
Chalut, Dominic
Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?
title Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?
title_full Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?
title_fullStr Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?
title_full_unstemmed Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?
title_short Do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?
title_sort do pediatric emergency departments pose a risk of infection?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21214927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-2
work_keys_str_mv AT quachcaroline dopediatricemergencydepartmentsposeariskofinfection
AT mooredorothy dopediatricemergencydepartmentsposeariskofinfection
AT ducharmefrancine dopediatricemergencydepartmentsposeariskofinfection
AT chalutdominic dopediatricemergencydepartmentsposeariskofinfection