Cargando…
Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subj...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21184670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-98 |
_version_ | 1782196582022643712 |
---|---|
author | Peterlein, Christian D Schüttler, Karl F Lakemeier, Stefan Timmesfeld, Nina Görg, Christian Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne Schofer, Markus D |
author_facet | Peterlein, Christian D Schüttler, Karl F Lakemeier, Stefan Timmesfeld, Nina Görg, Christian Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne Schofer, Markus D |
author_sort | Peterlein, Christian D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subjective parameters by three investigators with different levels of experience. METHODS: In 207 consecutive newborns (101 boys; 106 girls) the following parameters were assessed: bony roof angle (α-angle) and cartilage roof angle (β-angle) according to Graf's basic standard method, "femoral head coverage" (FHC) as described by Terjesen, shape of the bony roof and position of the cartilaginous roof. Both hips were measured twice by each investigator with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer (SONOLINE G60S(® )ultrasound system, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany). RESULTS: Mean kappa-coefficients for the subjective parameters shape of the bony roof (0.97) and position of the cartilaginous roof (1.0) demonstrated high intra-observer reproducibility. Best results were achieved for α-angle, followed by β-angle and finally FHC. With respect to limits of agreement, inter-observer reproducibility was calculated less precisely. CONCLUSIONS: Higher measurement differences were evaluated more in objective scorings. Those variations were observed by every investigator irrespective of level of experience. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3022795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30227952011-01-19 Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip Peterlein, Christian D Schüttler, Karl F Lakemeier, Stefan Timmesfeld, Nina Görg, Christian Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne Schofer, Markus D BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subjective parameters by three investigators with different levels of experience. METHODS: In 207 consecutive newborns (101 boys; 106 girls) the following parameters were assessed: bony roof angle (α-angle) and cartilage roof angle (β-angle) according to Graf's basic standard method, "femoral head coverage" (FHC) as described by Terjesen, shape of the bony roof and position of the cartilaginous roof. Both hips were measured twice by each investigator with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer (SONOLINE G60S(® )ultrasound system, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany). RESULTS: Mean kappa-coefficients for the subjective parameters shape of the bony roof (0.97) and position of the cartilaginous roof (1.0) demonstrated high intra-observer reproducibility. Best results were achieved for α-angle, followed by β-angle and finally FHC. With respect to limits of agreement, inter-observer reproducibility was calculated less precisely. CONCLUSIONS: Higher measurement differences were evaluated more in objective scorings. Those variations were observed by every investigator irrespective of level of experience. BioMed Central 2010-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3022795/ /pubmed/21184670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-98 Text en Copyright ©2010 Peterlein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peterlein, Christian D Schüttler, Karl F Lakemeier, Stefan Timmesfeld, Nina Görg, Christian Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne Schofer, Markus D Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip |
title | Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip |
title_full | Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip |
title_short | Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip |
title_sort | reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21184670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-98 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peterleinchristiand reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip AT schuttlerkarlf reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip AT lakemeierstefan reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip AT timmesfeldnina reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip AT gorgchristian reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip AT fuchswinkelmannsusanne reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip AT schofermarkusd reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip |