Cargando…

Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peterlein, Christian D, Schüttler, Karl F, Lakemeier, Stefan, Timmesfeld, Nina, Görg, Christian, Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne, Schofer, Markus D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21184670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-98
_version_ 1782196582022643712
author Peterlein, Christian D
Schüttler, Karl F
Lakemeier, Stefan
Timmesfeld, Nina
Görg, Christian
Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne
Schofer, Markus D
author_facet Peterlein, Christian D
Schüttler, Karl F
Lakemeier, Stefan
Timmesfeld, Nina
Görg, Christian
Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne
Schofer, Markus D
author_sort Peterlein, Christian D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subjective parameters by three investigators with different levels of experience. METHODS: In 207 consecutive newborns (101 boys; 106 girls) the following parameters were assessed: bony roof angle (α-angle) and cartilage roof angle (β-angle) according to Graf's basic standard method, "femoral head coverage" (FHC) as described by Terjesen, shape of the bony roof and position of the cartilaginous roof. Both hips were measured twice by each investigator with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer (SONOLINE G60S(® )ultrasound system, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany). RESULTS: Mean kappa-coefficients for the subjective parameters shape of the bony roof (0.97) and position of the cartilaginous roof (1.0) demonstrated high intra-observer reproducibility. Best results were achieved for α-angle, followed by β-angle and finally FHC. With respect to limits of agreement, inter-observer reproducibility was calculated less precisely. CONCLUSIONS: Higher measurement differences were evaluated more in objective scorings. Those variations were observed by every investigator irrespective of level of experience.
format Text
id pubmed-3022795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30227952011-01-19 Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip Peterlein, Christian D Schüttler, Karl F Lakemeier, Stefan Timmesfeld, Nina Görg, Christian Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne Schofer, Markus D BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography of the hip has gained wide acceptance as a primary method for diagnosis, screening and treatment monitoring of developmental hip dysplasia in infants. The aim of the study was to examine the degree of concordance of two objective classifications of hip morphology and subjective parameters by three investigators with different levels of experience. METHODS: In 207 consecutive newborns (101 boys; 106 girls) the following parameters were assessed: bony roof angle (α-angle) and cartilage roof angle (β-angle) according to Graf's basic standard method, "femoral head coverage" (FHC) as described by Terjesen, shape of the bony roof and position of the cartilaginous roof. Both hips were measured twice by each investigator with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer (SONOLINE G60S(® )ultrasound system, SIEMENS, Erlangen, Germany). RESULTS: Mean kappa-coefficients for the subjective parameters shape of the bony roof (0.97) and position of the cartilaginous roof (1.0) demonstrated high intra-observer reproducibility. Best results were achieved for α-angle, followed by β-angle and finally FHC. With respect to limits of agreement, inter-observer reproducibility was calculated less precisely. CONCLUSIONS: Higher measurement differences were evaluated more in objective scorings. Those variations were observed by every investigator irrespective of level of experience. BioMed Central 2010-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3022795/ /pubmed/21184670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-98 Text en Copyright ©2010 Peterlein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peterlein, Christian D
Schüttler, Karl F
Lakemeier, Stefan
Timmesfeld, Nina
Görg, Christian
Fuchs-Winkelmann, Susanne
Schofer, Markus D
Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
title Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
title_full Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
title_fullStr Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
title_short Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
title_sort reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21184670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-10-98
work_keys_str_mv AT peterleinchristiand reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip
AT schuttlerkarlf reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip
AT lakemeierstefan reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip
AT timmesfeldnina reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip
AT gorgchristian reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip
AT fuchswinkelmannsusanne reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip
AT schofermarkusd reproducibilityofdifferentscreeningclassificationsinultrasonographyofthenewbornhip