Cargando…

Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND: We recently showed that women with four clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) do not demonstrate anatomical evidence of elevated prenatal androgen exposure as judged by a lower ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. However, those findings conflicted with a previo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lujan, Marla E, Podolski, Amanda J, Chizen, Donna R, Lehotay, Denis C, Pierson, Roger A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21189149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-156
_version_ 1782196595795689472
author Lujan, Marla E
Podolski, Amanda J
Chizen, Donna R
Lehotay, Denis C
Pierson, Roger A
author_facet Lujan, Marla E
Podolski, Amanda J
Chizen, Donna R
Lehotay, Denis C
Pierson, Roger A
author_sort Lujan, Marla E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We recently showed that women with four clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) do not demonstrate anatomical evidence of elevated prenatal androgen exposure as judged by a lower ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. However, those findings conflicted with a previous study where women with PCOS had lower right hand 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls. Both these studies used Vernier calipers to measure finger lengths - a method recently shown to be less reliable at obtaining finger length measurements than computer-assisted analysis. METHODS: Ninety-six women diagnosed with PCOS according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria had their finger lengths measured with computer-assisted analysis. Participants were categorized into four recognized phenotypes of PCOS and their 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls (n = 48) and men (n = 50). RESULTS: Digit ratios assessed by computer-assisted analysis in women with PCOS did not differ from female controls, but were significantly lower in men. When subjects were stratified by PCOS phenotype, 2D:4D did not differ among phenotypes or when compared to female controls. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted measurements validated that digit ratios of women with PCOS do not show anatomical evidence of increased prenatal androgen exposure.
format Text
id pubmed-3022844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30228442011-01-19 Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome Lujan, Marla E Podolski, Amanda J Chizen, Donna R Lehotay, Denis C Pierson, Roger A Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: We recently showed that women with four clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) do not demonstrate anatomical evidence of elevated prenatal androgen exposure as judged by a lower ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. However, those findings conflicted with a previous study where women with PCOS had lower right hand 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls. Both these studies used Vernier calipers to measure finger lengths - a method recently shown to be less reliable at obtaining finger length measurements than computer-assisted analysis. METHODS: Ninety-six women diagnosed with PCOS according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria had their finger lengths measured with computer-assisted analysis. Participants were categorized into four recognized phenotypes of PCOS and their 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls (n = 48) and men (n = 50). RESULTS: Digit ratios assessed by computer-assisted analysis in women with PCOS did not differ from female controls, but were significantly lower in men. When subjects were stratified by PCOS phenotype, 2D:4D did not differ among phenotypes or when compared to female controls. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted measurements validated that digit ratios of women with PCOS do not show anatomical evidence of increased prenatal androgen exposure. BioMed Central 2010-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3022844/ /pubmed/21189149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-156 Text en Copyright ©2010 Lujan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lujan, Marla E
Podolski, Amanda J
Chizen, Donna R
Lehotay, Denis C
Pierson, Roger A
Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
title Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
title_full Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
title_fullStr Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
title_short Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
title_sort digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21189149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-156
work_keys_str_mv AT lujanmarlae digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome
AT podolskiamandaj digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome
AT chizendonnar digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome
AT lehotaydenisc digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome
AT piersonrogera digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome