Cargando…
Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome
BACKGROUND: We recently showed that women with four clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) do not demonstrate anatomical evidence of elevated prenatal androgen exposure as judged by a lower ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. However, those findings conflicted with a previo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21189149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-156 |
_version_ | 1782196595795689472 |
---|---|
author | Lujan, Marla E Podolski, Amanda J Chizen, Donna R Lehotay, Denis C Pierson, Roger A |
author_facet | Lujan, Marla E Podolski, Amanda J Chizen, Donna R Lehotay, Denis C Pierson, Roger A |
author_sort | Lujan, Marla E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We recently showed that women with four clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) do not demonstrate anatomical evidence of elevated prenatal androgen exposure as judged by a lower ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. However, those findings conflicted with a previous study where women with PCOS had lower right hand 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls. Both these studies used Vernier calipers to measure finger lengths - a method recently shown to be less reliable at obtaining finger length measurements than computer-assisted analysis. METHODS: Ninety-six women diagnosed with PCOS according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria had their finger lengths measured with computer-assisted analysis. Participants were categorized into four recognized phenotypes of PCOS and their 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls (n = 48) and men (n = 50). RESULTS: Digit ratios assessed by computer-assisted analysis in women with PCOS did not differ from female controls, but were significantly lower in men. When subjects were stratified by PCOS phenotype, 2D:4D did not differ among phenotypes or when compared to female controls. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted measurements validated that digit ratios of women with PCOS do not show anatomical evidence of increased prenatal androgen exposure. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3022844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30228442011-01-19 Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome Lujan, Marla E Podolski, Amanda J Chizen, Donna R Lehotay, Denis C Pierson, Roger A Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: We recently showed that women with four clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) do not demonstrate anatomical evidence of elevated prenatal androgen exposure as judged by a lower ratio of the index (2D) to ring (4D) finger. However, those findings conflicted with a previous study where women with PCOS had lower right hand 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls. Both these studies used Vernier calipers to measure finger lengths - a method recently shown to be less reliable at obtaining finger length measurements than computer-assisted analysis. METHODS: Ninety-six women diagnosed with PCOS according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria had their finger lengths measured with computer-assisted analysis. Participants were categorized into four recognized phenotypes of PCOS and their 2D:4D compared to healthy female controls (n = 48) and men (n = 50). RESULTS: Digit ratios assessed by computer-assisted analysis in women with PCOS did not differ from female controls, but were significantly lower in men. When subjects were stratified by PCOS phenotype, 2D:4D did not differ among phenotypes or when compared to female controls. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted measurements validated that digit ratios of women with PCOS do not show anatomical evidence of increased prenatal androgen exposure. BioMed Central 2010-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3022844/ /pubmed/21189149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-156 Text en Copyright ©2010 Lujan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Lujan, Marla E Podolski, Amanda J Chizen, Donna R Lehotay, Denis C Pierson, Roger A Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome |
title | Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome |
title_full | Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome |
title_fullStr | Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome |
title_short | Digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome |
title_sort | digit ratios by computer-assisted analysis confirm lack of anatomical evidence of prenatal androgen exposure in clinical phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21189149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lujanmarlae digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome AT podolskiamandaj digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome AT chizendonnar digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome AT lehotaydenisc digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome AT piersonrogera digitratiosbycomputerassistedanalysisconfirmlackofanatomicalevidenceofprenatalandrogenexposureinclinicalphenotypesofpolycysticovarysyndrome |