Cargando…

Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units

BACKGROUND: The cleaning stage of the instrument decontamination process has come under increased scrutiny due to the increasing complexity of surgical instruments and the adverse affects of residual protein contamination on surgical instruments. Instruments used in the podiatry field have a complex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Gordon WG, Goldie, Frank, Long, Steven, Lappin, David F, Ramage, Gordon, Smith, Andrew J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3023740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-2
_version_ 1782196692880195584
author Smith, Gordon WG
Goldie, Frank
Long, Steven
Lappin, David F
Ramage, Gordon
Smith, Andrew J
author_facet Smith, Gordon WG
Goldie, Frank
Long, Steven
Lappin, David F
Ramage, Gordon
Smith, Andrew J
author_sort Smith, Gordon WG
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cleaning stage of the instrument decontamination process has come under increased scrutiny due to the increasing complexity of surgical instruments and the adverse affects of residual protein contamination on surgical instruments. Instruments used in the podiatry field have a complex surface topography and are exposed to a wide range of biological contamination. Currently, podiatry instruments are reprocessed locally within surgeries while national strategies are favouring a move toward reprocessing in central facilities. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of local and central reprocessing on podiatry instruments by measuring residual protein contamination of instruments reprocessed by both methods. METHODS: The residual protein of 189 instruments reprocessed centrally and 189 instruments reprocessed locally was determined using a fluorescent assay based on the reaction of proteins with o-phthaldialdehyde/sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate. RESULTS: Residual protein was detected on 72% (n = 136) of instruments reprocessed centrally and 90% (n = 170) of instruments reprocessed locally. Significantly less protein (p < 0.001) was recovered from instruments reprocessed centrally (median 20.62 μg, range 0 - 5705 μg) than local reprocessing (median 111.9 μg, range 0 - 6344 μg). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results show the superiority of central reprocessing for complex podiatry instruments when protein contamination is considered, though no significant difference was found in residual protein between local decontamination unit and central decontamination unit processes for Blacks files. Further research is needed to undertake qualitative identification of protein contamination to identify any cross contamination risks and a standard for acceptable residual protein contamination applicable to different instruments and specialities should be considered as a matter of urgency.
format Text
id pubmed-3023740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30237402011-01-20 Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units Smith, Gordon WG Goldie, Frank Long, Steven Lappin, David F Ramage, Gordon Smith, Andrew J J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: The cleaning stage of the instrument decontamination process has come under increased scrutiny due to the increasing complexity of surgical instruments and the adverse affects of residual protein contamination on surgical instruments. Instruments used in the podiatry field have a complex surface topography and are exposed to a wide range of biological contamination. Currently, podiatry instruments are reprocessed locally within surgeries while national strategies are favouring a move toward reprocessing in central facilities. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of local and central reprocessing on podiatry instruments by measuring residual protein contamination of instruments reprocessed by both methods. METHODS: The residual protein of 189 instruments reprocessed centrally and 189 instruments reprocessed locally was determined using a fluorescent assay based on the reaction of proteins with o-phthaldialdehyde/sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate. RESULTS: Residual protein was detected on 72% (n = 136) of instruments reprocessed centrally and 90% (n = 170) of instruments reprocessed locally. Significantly less protein (p < 0.001) was recovered from instruments reprocessed centrally (median 20.62 μg, range 0 - 5705 μg) than local reprocessing (median 111.9 μg, range 0 - 6344 μg). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results show the superiority of central reprocessing for complex podiatry instruments when protein contamination is considered, though no significant difference was found in residual protein between local decontamination unit and central decontamination unit processes for Blacks files. Further research is needed to undertake qualitative identification of protein contamination to identify any cross contamination risks and a standard for acceptable residual protein contamination applicable to different instruments and specialities should be considered as a matter of urgency. BioMed Central 2011-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3023740/ /pubmed/21219613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-2 Text en Copyright ©2011 Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Smith, Gordon WG
Goldie, Frank
Long, Steven
Lappin, David F
Ramage, Gordon
Smith, Andrew J
Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units
title Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units
title_full Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units
title_fullStr Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units
title_short Quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units
title_sort quantitative analysis of residual protein contamination of podiatry instruments reprocessed through local and central decontamination units
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3023740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-2
work_keys_str_mv AT smithgordonwg quantitativeanalysisofresidualproteincontaminationofpodiatryinstrumentsreprocessedthroughlocalandcentraldecontaminationunits
AT goldiefrank quantitativeanalysisofresidualproteincontaminationofpodiatryinstrumentsreprocessedthroughlocalandcentraldecontaminationunits
AT longsteven quantitativeanalysisofresidualproteincontaminationofpodiatryinstrumentsreprocessedthroughlocalandcentraldecontaminationunits
AT lappindavidf quantitativeanalysisofresidualproteincontaminationofpodiatryinstrumentsreprocessedthroughlocalandcentraldecontaminationunits
AT ramagegordon quantitativeanalysisofresidualproteincontaminationofpodiatryinstrumentsreprocessedthroughlocalandcentraldecontaminationunits
AT smithandrewj quantitativeanalysisofresidualproteincontaminationofpodiatryinstrumentsreprocessedthroughlocalandcentraldecontaminationunits