Cargando…

Effect of Automated Bio-Behavioral Feedback on the Control of Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of an automated system providing real-time estimates of HbA(1c), glucose variability, and risk for hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: For 1 year, 120 adults with type 1 diabetes (69 female/51 male, age = 39.1 [14.3] years, duration of diabetes 20.3 [12.9] years,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kovatchev, Boris P., Mendosa, Pamela, Anderson, Stacey, Hawley, Jeffrey S., Ritterband, Lee M., Gonder-Frederick, Linda
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21216860
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1366
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of an automated system providing real-time estimates of HbA(1c), glucose variability, and risk for hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: For 1 year, 120 adults with type 1 diabetes (69 female/51 male, age = 39.1 [14.3] years, duration of diabetes 20.3 [12.9] years, HbA(1c) = 8.0 [1.5]), performed self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and received feedback at three increasingly complex levels, each continuing for 3 months: level 1—routine SMBG; level 2—adding estimated HbA(1c), hypoglycemia risk, and glucose variability; and level 3—adding estimates of symptoms potentially related to hypoglycemia. The subjects were randomized to feedback sequences of either levels 1-2-3 or levels 2-3-1. HbA(1c), symptomatic hypoglycemia, and blood glucose awareness were evaluated at baseline and at the end of each level. RESULTS: For all subjects, HbA(1c) was reduced from 8.0 to 7.6 from baseline to the end of study (P = 0.001). This effect was confined to subjects with baseline HbA(1c) >8.0 (from 9.3 to 8.5, P < 0.001). Incidence of symptomatic moderate/severe hypoglycemia was reduced from 5.72 to 3.74 episodes/person/month (P = 0.019), more prominently for subjects with a history of severe hypoglycemia (from 7.20 to 4.00 episodes, P = 0.008) and for those who were hypoglycemia unaware (from 6.44 to 3.71 episodes, P = 0.045). The subjects’ ratings of the feedback were positive, with up to 89% approval of the provided features. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback of SMBG data and summary SMBG-based measures resulted in improvement in average glycemic control and reduction in moderate/severe hypoglycemia. These effects were most prominent in subjects who were at highest risk at the baseline.