Cargando…
Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention of participants are critical to the success of a randomised controlled trial. Gaining the views of potential trial participants who decline to enter a trial and of trial participants who stop the trial treatment is important and can help to improve study process...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21223551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-7 |
_version_ | 1782196842345267200 |
---|---|
author | Eborall, Helen C Stewart, Marlene CW Cunningham-Burley, Sarah Price, Jackie F Fowkes, F Gerry R |
author_facet | Eborall, Helen C Stewart, Marlene CW Cunningham-Burley, Sarah Price, Jackie F Fowkes, F Gerry R |
author_sort | Eborall, Helen C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention of participants are critical to the success of a randomised controlled trial. Gaining the views of potential trial participants who decline to enter a trial and of trial participants who stop the trial treatment is important and can help to improve study processes. Limited research on these issues has been conducted on healthy individuals recruited for prevention trials in the community. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with people who were eligible but had declined to participate in the Aspirin for Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis (AAA) trial (N = 11), and AAA trial participants who had stopped taking the trial medication (N = 11). A focus group with further participants who had stopped taking the trial medication (N = 6). (Total participants N = 28). RESULTS: Explanations for declining to participate could be divided into two groups: the first group were characterised by a lack of necessity to participate and a tendency to prioritise other largely mundane problems. The second group's concern was with a high level of perceived risk from participating. Explanations for stopping trial medication fell into four categories: side effects attributed to the trial medication; starting on aspirin or medication contraindicating to aspirin; experiencing an outcome event, and changing one's mind. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that when planning trials (especially in preventive medicine) particular attention should be given to designing appropriate recruitment materials and processes that fully inform potential recruits of the risks and benefits of participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66587262 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3024954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30249542011-01-22 Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study Eborall, Helen C Stewart, Marlene CW Cunningham-Burley, Sarah Price, Jackie F Fowkes, F Gerry R Trials Research BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention of participants are critical to the success of a randomised controlled trial. Gaining the views of potential trial participants who decline to enter a trial and of trial participants who stop the trial treatment is important and can help to improve study processes. Limited research on these issues has been conducted on healthy individuals recruited for prevention trials in the community. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with people who were eligible but had declined to participate in the Aspirin for Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis (AAA) trial (N = 11), and AAA trial participants who had stopped taking the trial medication (N = 11). A focus group with further participants who had stopped taking the trial medication (N = 6). (Total participants N = 28). RESULTS: Explanations for declining to participate could be divided into two groups: the first group were characterised by a lack of necessity to participate and a tendency to prioritise other largely mundane problems. The second group's concern was with a high level of perceived risk from participating. Explanations for stopping trial medication fell into four categories: side effects attributed to the trial medication; starting on aspirin or medication contraindicating to aspirin; experiencing an outcome event, and changing one's mind. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that when planning trials (especially in preventive medicine) particular attention should be given to designing appropriate recruitment materials and processes that fully inform potential recruits of the risks and benefits of participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66587262 BioMed Central 2011-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3024954/ /pubmed/21223551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-7 Text en Copyright ©2011 Eborall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Eborall, Helen C Stewart, Marlene CW Cunningham-Burley, Sarah Price, Jackie F Fowkes, F Gerry R Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study |
title | Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study |
title_full | Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study |
title_short | Accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study |
title_sort | accrual and drop out in a primary prevention randomised controlled trial: qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21223551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eborallhelenc accrualanddropoutinaprimarypreventionrandomisedcontrolledtrialqualitativestudy AT stewartmarlenecw accrualanddropoutinaprimarypreventionrandomisedcontrolledtrialqualitativestudy AT cunninghamburleysarah accrualanddropoutinaprimarypreventionrandomisedcontrolledtrialqualitativestudy AT pricejackief accrualanddropoutinaprimarypreventionrandomisedcontrolledtrialqualitativestudy AT fowkesfgerryr accrualanddropoutinaprimarypreventionrandomisedcontrolledtrialqualitativestudy |