Cargando…

Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for mesh erosion in women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC). We hypothesize that erosion is higher in subjects undergoing concomitant hysterectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan-Kim, Jasmine, Menefee, Shawn A., Luber, Karl M., Nager, Charles W., Lukacz, Emily S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20842494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1265-3
_version_ 1782196869860950016
author Tan-Kim, Jasmine
Menefee, Shawn A.
Luber, Karl M.
Nager, Charles W.
Lukacz, Emily S.
author_facet Tan-Kim, Jasmine
Menefee, Shawn A.
Luber, Karl M.
Nager, Charles W.
Lukacz, Emily S.
author_sort Tan-Kim, Jasmine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for mesh erosion in women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC). We hypothesize that erosion is higher in subjects undergoing concomitant hysterectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent MISC between November 2004 and January 2009. Demographics, operative techniques, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Multivariable regression identified odds of erosion. RESULTS: Of 188 MISC procedures 19(10%) had erosions. Erosion was higher in those with total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) compared to both post-hysterectomy (23% vs. 5%, p = 0.003) and supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) (23% vs. 5%, p = 0.109) groups. In multivariable regression, the odds of erosion for TVH was 5.67 (95% CI: 1.88–17.10) compared to post-hysterectomy. Smoking, the use of collagen-coated mesh, transvaginal dissection, and mesh attachment transvaginally were no longer significant in the multivariable regression model. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, surgeons should consider supracervical hysterectomy over total vaginal hysterectomy as the procedure of choice in association with MISC unless removal of the cervix is otherwise indicated.
format Text
id pubmed-3025104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30251042011-02-22 Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy Tan-Kim, Jasmine Menefee, Shawn A. Luber, Karl M. Nager, Charles W. Lukacz, Emily S. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for mesh erosion in women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC). We hypothesize that erosion is higher in subjects undergoing concomitant hysterectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent MISC between November 2004 and January 2009. Demographics, operative techniques, and outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Multivariable regression identified odds of erosion. RESULTS: Of 188 MISC procedures 19(10%) had erosions. Erosion was higher in those with total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) compared to both post-hysterectomy (23% vs. 5%, p = 0.003) and supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) (23% vs. 5%, p = 0.109) groups. In multivariable regression, the odds of erosion for TVH was 5.67 (95% CI: 1.88–17.10) compared to post-hysterectomy. Smoking, the use of collagen-coated mesh, transvaginal dissection, and mesh attachment transvaginally were no longer significant in the multivariable regression model. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, surgeons should consider supracervical hysterectomy over total vaginal hysterectomy as the procedure of choice in association with MISC unless removal of the cervix is otherwise indicated. Springer-Verlag 2010-09-15 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3025104/ /pubmed/20842494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1265-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tan-Kim, Jasmine
Menefee, Shawn A.
Luber, Karl M.
Nager, Charles W.
Lukacz, Emily S.
Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
title Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
title_full Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
title_fullStr Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
title_short Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
title_sort prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20842494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1265-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tankimjasmine prevalenceandriskfactorsformesherosionafterlaparoscopicassistedsacrocolpopexy
AT menefeeshawna prevalenceandriskfactorsformesherosionafterlaparoscopicassistedsacrocolpopexy
AT luberkarlm prevalenceandriskfactorsformesherosionafterlaparoscopicassistedsacrocolpopexy
AT nagercharlesw prevalenceandriskfactorsformesherosionafterlaparoscopicassistedsacrocolpopexy
AT lukaczemilys prevalenceandriskfactorsformesherosionafterlaparoscopicassistedsacrocolpopexy