Cargando…
Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol
BACKGROUND: Disease management programmes (DMPs) have been developed to improve effectiveness and economic efficiency within chronic care delivery by combining patient-related, professional-directed, and organisational interventions. The benefits of DMPs within different settings, patient groups, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-6 |
_version_ | 1782196940429066240 |
---|---|
author | Lemmens, Karin MM Rutten-Van Mölken, Maureen PMH Cramm, Jane M Huijsman, Robbert Bal, Roland A Nieboer, Anna P |
author_facet | Lemmens, Karin MM Rutten-Van Mölken, Maureen PMH Cramm, Jane M Huijsman, Robbert Bal, Roland A Nieboer, Anna P |
author_sort | Lemmens, Karin MM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Disease management programmes (DMPs) have been developed to improve effectiveness and economic efficiency within chronic care delivery by combining patient-related, professional-directed, and organisational interventions. The benefits of DMPs within different settings, patient groups, and versions remain unclear. In this article we propose a protocol to evaluate a range of current DMPs by capturing them in a single conceptual framework, employing comparable structure, process, and outcome measures, and combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. METHODS: To assess DMP effectiveness a practical clinical trial will be conducted. Twenty-two disease management experiments will be studied in various Dutch regions consisting of a variety of collaborations between organisations and/or professionals. Patient cohorts include those with cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, stroke, depression, psychotic diseases, and eating disorders. Our methodological approach combines qualitative and quantitative research methods to enable a comprehensive evaluation of complex programmes. Process indicators will be collected from health care providers' data registries and measured via physician and staff questionnaires. Patient questionnaires include health care experiences, health care utilisation, and quality of life. Qualitative data will be gathered by means of interviews and document analysis for an in depth description of project interventions and the contexts in which DMPs are embedded, and an ethnographic process evaluation in five DMPs. Such a design will provide insight into ongoing DMPs and demonstrate which elements of the intervention are potentially (cost)-effective for which patient populations. It will also enable sound comparison of the results of the different programmes. DISCUSSION: The study will lead to a better understanding of (1) the mechanisms of disease management, (2) the feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of a disease management approach to improving health care, and (3) the factors that determine success and failure of DMPs. Our study results will be relevant to decision makers and managers who confront the challenge of implementing and integrating DMPs into the health care system. Moreover, it will contribute to the search for methods to evaluate complex healthcare interventions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3025828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30258282011-01-25 Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol Lemmens, Karin MM Rutten-Van Mölken, Maureen PMH Cramm, Jane M Huijsman, Robbert Bal, Roland A Nieboer, Anna P BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Disease management programmes (DMPs) have been developed to improve effectiveness and economic efficiency within chronic care delivery by combining patient-related, professional-directed, and organisational interventions. The benefits of DMPs within different settings, patient groups, and versions remain unclear. In this article we propose a protocol to evaluate a range of current DMPs by capturing them in a single conceptual framework, employing comparable structure, process, and outcome measures, and combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. METHODS: To assess DMP effectiveness a practical clinical trial will be conducted. Twenty-two disease management experiments will be studied in various Dutch regions consisting of a variety of collaborations between organisations and/or professionals. Patient cohorts include those with cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, stroke, depression, psychotic diseases, and eating disorders. Our methodological approach combines qualitative and quantitative research methods to enable a comprehensive evaluation of complex programmes. Process indicators will be collected from health care providers' data registries and measured via physician and staff questionnaires. Patient questionnaires include health care experiences, health care utilisation, and quality of life. Qualitative data will be gathered by means of interviews and document analysis for an in depth description of project interventions and the contexts in which DMPs are embedded, and an ethnographic process evaluation in five DMPs. Such a design will provide insight into ongoing DMPs and demonstrate which elements of the intervention are potentially (cost)-effective for which patient populations. It will also enable sound comparison of the results of the different programmes. DISCUSSION: The study will lead to a better understanding of (1) the mechanisms of disease management, (2) the feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of a disease management approach to improving health care, and (3) the factors that determine success and failure of DMPs. Our study results will be relevant to decision makers and managers who confront the challenge of implementing and integrating DMPs into the health care system. Moreover, it will contribute to the search for methods to evaluate complex healthcare interventions. BioMed Central 2011-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3025828/ /pubmed/21219620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-6 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lemmens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lemmens, Karin MM Rutten-Van Mölken, Maureen PMH Cramm, Jane M Huijsman, Robbert Bal, Roland A Nieboer, Anna P Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol |
title | Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol |
title_full | Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol |
title_short | Evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various Dutch regions: a study protocol |
title_sort | evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes in various dutch regions: a study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3025828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lemmenskarinmm evaluationofalargescaleimplementationofdiseasemanagementprogrammesinvariousdutchregionsastudyprotocol AT ruttenvanmolkenmaureenpmh evaluationofalargescaleimplementationofdiseasemanagementprogrammesinvariousdutchregionsastudyprotocol AT crammjanem evaluationofalargescaleimplementationofdiseasemanagementprogrammesinvariousdutchregionsastudyprotocol AT huijsmanrobbert evaluationofalargescaleimplementationofdiseasemanagementprogrammesinvariousdutchregionsastudyprotocol AT balrolanda evaluationofalargescaleimplementationofdiseasemanagementprogrammesinvariousdutchregionsastudyprotocol AT nieboerannap evaluationofalargescaleimplementationofdiseasemanagementprogrammesinvariousdutchregionsastudyprotocol |