Cargando…

Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks

BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in biology is the correct identification of promoter regions. Computational methods based on motif searching have been the traditional approach taken. Recent studies have shown that DNA structural properties, such as curvature, stacking energy, and stress-indu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bland, Charles, Newsome, Abigail S, Markovets, Aleksandra A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S17
_version_ 1782197035765596160
author Bland, Charles
Newsome, Abigail S
Markovets, Aleksandra A
author_facet Bland, Charles
Newsome, Abigail S
Markovets, Aleksandra A
author_sort Bland, Charles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in biology is the correct identification of promoter regions. Computational methods based on motif searching have been the traditional approach taken. Recent studies have shown that DNA structural properties, such as curvature, stacking energy, and stress-induced duplex destabilization (SIDD) are useful in promoter prediction, as well. In this paper, the currently used SIDD energy threshold method is compared to the proposed artificial neural network (ANN) approach for finding promoters based on SIDD profile data. RESULTS: When compared to the SIDD threshold prediction method, artificial neural networks showed noticeable improvements for precision, recall, and F-score over a range of values. The maximal F-score for the ANN classifier was 62.3 and 56.8 for the threshold-based classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial neural networks were used to predict promoters based on SIDD profile data. Results using this technique were an improvement over the previous SIDD threshold approach. Over a wide range of precision-recall values, artificial neural networks were more capable of identifying distinctive characteristics of promoter regions than threshold based methods.
format Text
id pubmed-3026364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30263642011-01-26 Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks Bland, Charles Newsome, Abigail S Markovets, Aleksandra A BMC Bioinformatics Proceedings BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in biology is the correct identification of promoter regions. Computational methods based on motif searching have been the traditional approach taken. Recent studies have shown that DNA structural properties, such as curvature, stacking energy, and stress-induced duplex destabilization (SIDD) are useful in promoter prediction, as well. In this paper, the currently used SIDD energy threshold method is compared to the proposed artificial neural network (ANN) approach for finding promoters based on SIDD profile data. RESULTS: When compared to the SIDD threshold prediction method, artificial neural networks showed noticeable improvements for precision, recall, and F-score over a range of values. The maximal F-score for the ANN classifier was 62.3 and 56.8 for the threshold-based classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial neural networks were used to predict promoters based on SIDD profile data. Results using this technique were an improvement over the previous SIDD threshold approach. Over a wide range of precision-recall values, artificial neural networks were more capable of identifying distinctive characteristics of promoter regions than threshold based methods. BioMed Central 2010-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3026364/ /pubmed/20946600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S17 Text en Copyright ©2010 Newsome et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Bland, Charles
Newsome, Abigail S
Markovets, Aleksandra A
Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks
title Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks
title_full Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks
title_fullStr Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks
title_short Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks
title_sort promoter prediction in e. coli based on sidd profiles and artificial neural networks
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S17
work_keys_str_mv AT blandcharles promoterpredictioninecolibasedonsiddprofilesandartificialneuralnetworks
AT newsomeabigails promoterpredictioninecolibasedonsiddprofilesandartificialneuralnetworks
AT markovetsaleksandraa promoterpredictioninecolibasedonsiddprofilesandartificialneuralnetworks