Cargando…
Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks
BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in biology is the correct identification of promoter regions. Computational methods based on motif searching have been the traditional approach taken. Recent studies have shown that DNA structural properties, such as curvature, stacking energy, and stress-indu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S17 |
_version_ | 1782197035765596160 |
---|---|
author | Bland, Charles Newsome, Abigail S Markovets, Aleksandra A |
author_facet | Bland, Charles Newsome, Abigail S Markovets, Aleksandra A |
author_sort | Bland, Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in biology is the correct identification of promoter regions. Computational methods based on motif searching have been the traditional approach taken. Recent studies have shown that DNA structural properties, such as curvature, stacking energy, and stress-induced duplex destabilization (SIDD) are useful in promoter prediction, as well. In this paper, the currently used SIDD energy threshold method is compared to the proposed artificial neural network (ANN) approach for finding promoters based on SIDD profile data. RESULTS: When compared to the SIDD threshold prediction method, artificial neural networks showed noticeable improvements for precision, recall, and F-score over a range of values. The maximal F-score for the ANN classifier was 62.3 and 56.8 for the threshold-based classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial neural networks were used to predict promoters based on SIDD profile data. Results using this technique were an improvement over the previous SIDD threshold approach. Over a wide range of precision-recall values, artificial neural networks were more capable of identifying distinctive characteristics of promoter regions than threshold based methods. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3026364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30263642011-01-26 Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks Bland, Charles Newsome, Abigail S Markovets, Aleksandra A BMC Bioinformatics Proceedings BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in biology is the correct identification of promoter regions. Computational methods based on motif searching have been the traditional approach taken. Recent studies have shown that DNA structural properties, such as curvature, stacking energy, and stress-induced duplex destabilization (SIDD) are useful in promoter prediction, as well. In this paper, the currently used SIDD energy threshold method is compared to the proposed artificial neural network (ANN) approach for finding promoters based on SIDD profile data. RESULTS: When compared to the SIDD threshold prediction method, artificial neural networks showed noticeable improvements for precision, recall, and F-score over a range of values. The maximal F-score for the ANN classifier was 62.3 and 56.8 for the threshold-based classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial neural networks were used to predict promoters based on SIDD profile data. Results using this technique were an improvement over the previous SIDD threshold approach. Over a wide range of precision-recall values, artificial neural networks were more capable of identifying distinctive characteristics of promoter regions than threshold based methods. BioMed Central 2010-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3026364/ /pubmed/20946600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S17 Text en Copyright ©2010 Newsome et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Proceedings Bland, Charles Newsome, Abigail S Markovets, Aleksandra A Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks |
title | Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks |
title_full | Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks |
title_fullStr | Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks |
title_short | Promoter prediction in E. coli based on SIDD profiles and Artificial Neural Networks |
title_sort | promoter prediction in e. coli based on sidd profiles and artificial neural networks |
topic | Proceedings |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blandcharles promoterpredictioninecolibasedonsiddprofilesandartificialneuralnetworks AT newsomeabigails promoterpredictioninecolibasedonsiddprofilesandartificialneuralnetworks AT markovetsaleksandraa promoterpredictioninecolibasedonsiddprofilesandartificialneuralnetworks |