Cargando…

Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided segmentation and border detection in dermoscopic images is one of the core components of diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions for skin cancer. Automated assessment tools for dermoscopy images have become an important research field mainly because of inter- a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kockara, Sinan, Mete, Mutlu, Chen, Bernard, Aydin, Kemal
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S26
_version_ 1782197038057783296
author Kockara, Sinan
Mete, Mutlu
Chen, Bernard
Aydin, Kemal
author_facet Kockara, Sinan
Mete, Mutlu
Chen, Bernard
Aydin, Kemal
author_sort Kockara, Sinan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-aided segmentation and border detection in dermoscopic images is one of the core components of diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions for skin cancer. Automated assessment tools for dermoscopy images have become an important research field mainly because of inter- and intra-observer variations in human interpretation. In this study, we compare two approaches for automatic border detection in dermoscopy images: density based clustering (DBSCAN) and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering algorithms. In the first approach, if there exists enough density –greater than certain number of points- around a point, then either a new cluster is formed around the point or an existing cluster grows by including the point and its neighbors. In the second approach FCM clustering is used. This approach has the ability to assign one data point into more than one cluster. RESULTS: Each approach is examined on a set of 100 dermoscopy images whose manually drawn borders by a dermatologist are used as the ground truth. Error rates; false positives and false negatives along with true positives and true negatives are quantified by comparing results with manually determined borders from a dermatologist. The assessments obtained from both methods are quantitatively analyzed over three accuracy measures: border error, precision, and recall. CONCLUSION: As well as low border error, high precision and recall, visual outcome showed that the DBSCAN effectively delineated targeted lesion, and has bright future; however, the FCM had poor performance especially in border error metric.
format Text
id pubmed-3026373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30263732011-01-26 Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images Kockara, Sinan Mete, Mutlu Chen, Bernard Aydin, Kemal BMC Bioinformatics Proceedings BACKGROUND: Computer-aided segmentation and border detection in dermoscopic images is one of the core components of diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions for skin cancer. Automated assessment tools for dermoscopy images have become an important research field mainly because of inter- and intra-observer variations in human interpretation. In this study, we compare two approaches for automatic border detection in dermoscopy images: density based clustering (DBSCAN) and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering algorithms. In the first approach, if there exists enough density –greater than certain number of points- around a point, then either a new cluster is formed around the point or an existing cluster grows by including the point and its neighbors. In the second approach FCM clustering is used. This approach has the ability to assign one data point into more than one cluster. RESULTS: Each approach is examined on a set of 100 dermoscopy images whose manually drawn borders by a dermatologist are used as the ground truth. Error rates; false positives and false negatives along with true positives and true negatives are quantified by comparing results with manually determined borders from a dermatologist. The assessments obtained from both methods are quantitatively analyzed over three accuracy measures: border error, precision, and recall. CONCLUSION: As well as low border error, high precision and recall, visual outcome showed that the DBSCAN effectively delineated targeted lesion, and has bright future; however, the FCM had poor performance especially in border error metric. BioMed Central 2010-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3026373/ /pubmed/20946610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S26 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kockara and Mete; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Kockara, Sinan
Mete, Mutlu
Chen, Bernard
Aydin, Kemal
Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images
title Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images
title_full Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images
title_fullStr Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images
title_short Analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images
title_sort analysis of density based and fuzzy c-means clustering methods on lesion border extraction in dermoscopy images
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S26
work_keys_str_mv AT kockarasinan analysisofdensitybasedandfuzzycmeansclusteringmethodsonlesionborderextractionindermoscopyimages
AT metemutlu analysisofdensitybasedandfuzzycmeansclusteringmethodsonlesionborderextractionindermoscopyimages
AT chenbernard analysisofdensitybasedandfuzzycmeansclusteringmethodsonlesionborderextractionindermoscopyimages
AT aydinkemal analysisofdensitybasedandfuzzycmeansclusteringmethodsonlesionborderextractionindermoscopyimages