Cargando…

Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement

The current study investigated whether capture of the eyes by a salient onset distractor and the disengagement of the eyes from that distractor are driven by the same or by different underlying control modes. A variant of the classic oculomotor capture task was used. Observers had to make a saccade...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Born, Sabine, Kerzel, Dirk, Theeuwes, Jan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21188362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2510-1
_version_ 1782197064766062592
author Born, Sabine
Kerzel, Dirk
Theeuwes, Jan
author_facet Born, Sabine
Kerzel, Dirk
Theeuwes, Jan
author_sort Born, Sabine
collection PubMed
description The current study investigated whether capture of the eyes by a salient onset distractor and the disengagement of the eyes from that distractor are driven by the same or by different underlying control modes. A variant of the classic oculomotor capture task was used. Observers had to make a saccade to the only gray circle among red background circles. On some trials, a green (novel color), red (placeholder color) or gray (target color) distractor square was presented with sudden onset. Results showed that when participants reacted fast, oculomotor capture was primarily driven by bottom-up pop-out: both types of distractors (green and gray) that popped out among the red background elements showed more capture than a red distractor that did not pop-out. In contrast to initial capture, disengagement of the eyes from the distractor was driven by top-down target–distractor similarity effects. We also examined the time-course of this effect. The distractor could change from green to either the target or placeholder color. When the color change was early in time (30–40 ms after its onset), dwell times were strongly affected by the change, whereas the effect on oculomotor capture was weak. Importantly, a change occurring as early as 60–80 ms after distractor onset did neither affect capture nor dwell times, corroborating the assumption of parallel programming of saccades.
format Text
id pubmed-3026665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30266652011-02-22 Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement Born, Sabine Kerzel, Dirk Theeuwes, Jan Exp Brain Res Research Article The current study investigated whether capture of the eyes by a salient onset distractor and the disengagement of the eyes from that distractor are driven by the same or by different underlying control modes. A variant of the classic oculomotor capture task was used. Observers had to make a saccade to the only gray circle among red background circles. On some trials, a green (novel color), red (placeholder color) or gray (target color) distractor square was presented with sudden onset. Results showed that when participants reacted fast, oculomotor capture was primarily driven by bottom-up pop-out: both types of distractors (green and gray) that popped out among the red background elements showed more capture than a red distractor that did not pop-out. In contrast to initial capture, disengagement of the eyes from the distractor was driven by top-down target–distractor similarity effects. We also examined the time-course of this effect. The distractor could change from green to either the target or placeholder color. When the color change was early in time (30–40 ms after its onset), dwell times were strongly affected by the change, whereas the effect on oculomotor capture was weak. Importantly, a change occurring as early as 60–80 ms after distractor onset did neither affect capture nor dwell times, corroborating the assumption of parallel programming of saccades. Springer-Verlag 2010-12-25 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3026665/ /pubmed/21188362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2510-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Born, Sabine
Kerzel, Dirk
Theeuwes, Jan
Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement
title Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement
title_full Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement
title_fullStr Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement
title_short Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement
title_sort evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21188362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2510-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bornsabine evidenceforadissociationbetweenthecontrolofoculomotorcaptureanddisengagement
AT kerzeldirk evidenceforadissociationbetweenthecontrolofoculomotorcaptureanddisengagement
AT theeuwesjan evidenceforadissociationbetweenthecontrolofoculomotorcaptureanddisengagement