Cargando…

Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the experiences and preferences of applicants to emergency medicine (EM) residency programs about being contacted by programs after their interview day but before the rank list submission deadline. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed all applicants to an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yarris, Lalena M., DeIorio, Nicole M., Gaines, Sarah S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3027442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21293769
_version_ 1782197137431330816
author Yarris, Lalena M.
DeIorio, Nicole M.
Gaines, Sarah S.
author_facet Yarris, Lalena M.
DeIorio, Nicole M.
Gaines, Sarah S.
author_sort Yarris, Lalena M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the experiences and preferences of applicants to emergency medicine (EM) residency programs about being contacted by programs after their interview day but before the rank list submission deadline. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed all applicants to an academic EM residency during the 2006–2007 interview cycle. Participation was anonymous and voluntary. We used a Web-based survey software program to administer the survey in February 2007, after rank lists were submitted. Two additional invitations to participate were sent over the next month. The instrument contained multiple-choice and free-text items. This study was submitted to our Institutional Review Board and was exempt from formal review. RESULTS: 240/706 (34%) of applicants completed the survey. 89% (214/240) of respondents reported being contacted by a residency program after their interview but before rank lists were due. Of those contacted, 91% report being contacted by e-mail; 67% by mail; and 55% by phone. 51% of subjects reported that being contacted changed the order of their rank list in at least one case. A majority of contacted applicants felt “happy” (58%) or “excited” (56%) about being contacted, but significant numbers reported feeling “put on the spot” (21%) or “uncomfortable” (17%).A majority felt that it is appropriate for programs to contact applicants after interview day but before the rank lists are submitted, but 39% of contacted subjects responded that contact by phone is either “always inappropriate” or “usually inappropriate.” Regarding perceptions regarding the rules of the match, 80% (165/206) of respondents felt it was appropriate to tell programs where they would be ranked, and 41% (85/206) felt it was appropriate for programs to notify applicants of their place on the program’s rank list. CONCLUSION: Most EM residency applicants report being contacted by programs after the interview day but before rank lists are submitted. Although applicants feel this practice is appropriate in general, over a third of subjects feel that contact by phone is inappropriate. These findings suggest that residency programs can expect a majority of their applicants to be contacted after an interview at another program, and shed light on how applicants perceive this practice.
format Text
id pubmed-3027442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30274422011-02-03 Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day Yarris, Lalena M. DeIorio, Nicole M. Gaines, Sarah S. West J Emerg Med Education/Academic Medicine OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the experiences and preferences of applicants to emergency medicine (EM) residency programs about being contacted by programs after their interview day but before the rank list submission deadline. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed all applicants to an academic EM residency during the 2006–2007 interview cycle. Participation was anonymous and voluntary. We used a Web-based survey software program to administer the survey in February 2007, after rank lists were submitted. Two additional invitations to participate were sent over the next month. The instrument contained multiple-choice and free-text items. This study was submitted to our Institutional Review Board and was exempt from formal review. RESULTS: 240/706 (34%) of applicants completed the survey. 89% (214/240) of respondents reported being contacted by a residency program after their interview but before rank lists were due. Of those contacted, 91% report being contacted by e-mail; 67% by mail; and 55% by phone. 51% of subjects reported that being contacted changed the order of their rank list in at least one case. A majority of contacted applicants felt “happy” (58%) or “excited” (56%) about being contacted, but significant numbers reported feeling “put on the spot” (21%) or “uncomfortable” (17%).A majority felt that it is appropriate for programs to contact applicants after interview day but before the rank lists are submitted, but 39% of contacted subjects responded that contact by phone is either “always inappropriate” or “usually inappropriate.” Regarding perceptions regarding the rules of the match, 80% (165/206) of respondents felt it was appropriate to tell programs where they would be ranked, and 41% (85/206) felt it was appropriate for programs to notify applicants of their place on the program’s rank list. CONCLUSION: Most EM residency applicants report being contacted by programs after the interview day but before rank lists are submitted. Although applicants feel this practice is appropriate in general, over a third of subjects feel that contact by phone is inappropriate. These findings suggest that residency programs can expect a majority of their applicants to be contacted after an interview at another program, and shed light on how applicants perceive this practice. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3027442/ /pubmed/21293769 Text en Copyright © 2010 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Education/Academic Medicine
Yarris, Lalena M.
DeIorio, Nicole M.
Gaines, Sarah S.
Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day
title Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day
title_full Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day
title_fullStr Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day
title_short Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants’ Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day
title_sort emergency medicine residency applicants’ perceptions about being contacted after interview day
topic Education/Academic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3027442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21293769
work_keys_str_mv AT yarrislalenam emergencymedicineresidencyapplicantsperceptionsaboutbeingcontactedafterinterviewday
AT deiorionicolem emergencymedicineresidencyapplicantsperceptionsaboutbeingcontactedafterinterviewday
AT gainessarahs emergencymedicineresidencyapplicantsperceptionsaboutbeingcontactedafterinterviewday