Cargando…
Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS
The function of chronic brain machine interfaces depends on stable electrical contact between neurons and electrodes. A key step in the development of interfaces is therefore to identify implant configurations that minimize adverse long-term tissue reactions. To this end, we here characterized the s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3027655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21298109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016267 |
_version_ | 1782197152164872192 |
---|---|
author | Thelin, Jonas Jörntell, Henrik Psouni, Elia Garwicz, Martin Schouenborg, Jens Danielsen, Nils Linsmeier, Cecilia Eriksson |
author_facet | Thelin, Jonas Jörntell, Henrik Psouni, Elia Garwicz, Martin Schouenborg, Jens Danielsen, Nils Linsmeier, Cecilia Eriksson |
author_sort | Thelin, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The function of chronic brain machine interfaces depends on stable electrical contact between neurons and electrodes. A key step in the development of interfaces is therefore to identify implant configurations that minimize adverse long-term tissue reactions. To this end, we here characterized the separate and combined effects of implant size and fixation mode at 6 and 12 weeks post implantation in rat (n = 24) cerebral cortex. Neurons and activated microglia and astrocytes were visualized using NeuN, ED1 and GFAP immunofluorescence microscopy, respectively. The contributions of individual experimental variables to the tissue response were quantified. Implants tethered to the skull caused larger tissue reactions than un-tethered implants. Small diameter (50 µm) implants elicited smaller tissue reactions and resulted in the survival of larger numbers of neurons than did large diameter (200 µm) implants. In addition, tethering resulted in an oval-shaped cavity, with a cross-section area larger than that of the implant itself, and in marked changes in morphology and organization of neurons in the region closest to the tissue interface. Most importantly, for implants that were both large diameter and tethered, glia activation was still ongoing 12 weeks after implantation, as indicated by an increase in GFAP staining between week 6 and 12, while this pattern was not observed for un-tethered, small diameter implants. Our findings therefore clearly indicate that the combined small diameter, un-tethered implants cause the smallest tissue reactions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3027655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30276552011-02-04 Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS Thelin, Jonas Jörntell, Henrik Psouni, Elia Garwicz, Martin Schouenborg, Jens Danielsen, Nils Linsmeier, Cecilia Eriksson PLoS One Research Article The function of chronic brain machine interfaces depends on stable electrical contact between neurons and electrodes. A key step in the development of interfaces is therefore to identify implant configurations that minimize adverse long-term tissue reactions. To this end, we here characterized the separate and combined effects of implant size and fixation mode at 6 and 12 weeks post implantation in rat (n = 24) cerebral cortex. Neurons and activated microglia and astrocytes were visualized using NeuN, ED1 and GFAP immunofluorescence microscopy, respectively. The contributions of individual experimental variables to the tissue response were quantified. Implants tethered to the skull caused larger tissue reactions than un-tethered implants. Small diameter (50 µm) implants elicited smaller tissue reactions and resulted in the survival of larger numbers of neurons than did large diameter (200 µm) implants. In addition, tethering resulted in an oval-shaped cavity, with a cross-section area larger than that of the implant itself, and in marked changes in morphology and organization of neurons in the region closest to the tissue interface. Most importantly, for implants that were both large diameter and tethered, glia activation was still ongoing 12 weeks after implantation, as indicated by an increase in GFAP staining between week 6 and 12, while this pattern was not observed for un-tethered, small diameter implants. Our findings therefore clearly indicate that the combined small diameter, un-tethered implants cause the smallest tissue reactions. Public Library of Science 2011-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3027655/ /pubmed/21298109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016267 Text en Thelin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thelin, Jonas Jörntell, Henrik Psouni, Elia Garwicz, Martin Schouenborg, Jens Danielsen, Nils Linsmeier, Cecilia Eriksson Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS |
title | Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS |
title_full | Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS |
title_fullStr | Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS |
title_short | Implant Size and Fixation Mode Strongly Influence Tissue Reactions in the CNS |
title_sort | implant size and fixation mode strongly influence tissue reactions in the cns |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3027655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21298109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thelinjonas implantsizeandfixationmodestronglyinfluencetissuereactionsinthecns AT jorntellhenrik implantsizeandfixationmodestronglyinfluencetissuereactionsinthecns AT psounielia implantsizeandfixationmodestronglyinfluencetissuereactionsinthecns AT garwiczmartin implantsizeandfixationmodestronglyinfluencetissuereactionsinthecns AT schouenborgjens implantsizeandfixationmodestronglyinfluencetissuereactionsinthecns AT danielsennils implantsizeandfixationmodestronglyinfluencetissuereactionsinthecns AT linsmeierceciliaeriksson implantsizeandfixationmodestronglyinfluencetissuereactionsinthecns |