Cargando…

Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas

BACKGROUND: To investigate the natural history and the growth rate of spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs). METHODS: Ninety patients with a diagnosis of SOM were included, and patient charts and imaging were evaluated. In a subset of 32 patients, volumetric studies were performed. RESULTS: The median f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeed, Peerooz, van Furth, Wouter R., Tanck, Michael, Kooremans, Fabio, Freling, Nicole, Streekstra, Geert I., Regensburg, Noortje I., van der Sprenkel, Jan Willem Berkelbach, Peerdeman, Saskia M., van Overbeeke, Jakobus J., Mourits, Maarten P.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3029659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0878-0
_version_ 1782197234866061312
author Saeed, Peerooz
van Furth, Wouter R.
Tanck, Michael
Kooremans, Fabio
Freling, Nicole
Streekstra, Geert I.
Regensburg, Noortje I.
van der Sprenkel, Jan Willem Berkelbach
Peerdeman, Saskia M.
van Overbeeke, Jakobus J.
Mourits, Maarten P.
author_facet Saeed, Peerooz
van Furth, Wouter R.
Tanck, Michael
Kooremans, Fabio
Freling, Nicole
Streekstra, Geert I.
Regensburg, Noortje I.
van der Sprenkel, Jan Willem Berkelbach
Peerdeman, Saskia M.
van Overbeeke, Jakobus J.
Mourits, Maarten P.
author_sort Saeed, Peerooz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the natural history and the growth rate of spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs). METHODS: Ninety patients with a diagnosis of SOM were included, and patient charts and imaging were evaluated. In a subset of 32 patients, volumetric studies were performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire group was 4 years (range, 1–15); the mean age was 47.8 (range, 26–93) years; 94% of the patients were female. The most common clinical signs and symptoms were proptosis (93%), visual deterioration (65%), retro-bulbar pain (23%) and diplopia (6%). In 35% of patients in this series, no visual deterioration occurred, and in 30% only mild proptosis was present. The median annual growth rate of the SOMs in the subset of 32 patients was 0.3 cm(3)/year (range, 0.03–1.8 cm(3)/year). We assessed a trend for more rapid tumour growth in younger patients and found the initial volume of the tumour (rho = 0.63) and of the soft tissue component (rho = 074) to be significantly related to the growth rate. CONCLUSION: SOMs are slow-growing tumours that cause primarily proptosis and visual deterioration. In a significant number of patients, these tumours cause minimal discomfort and symptomatology. Therefore, in the absence of risk factors, we advocate a “wait and see” policy. For patients with large SOMs or with a large soft tissue component at first visit or with fast growing SOMs (>1cm(3)/year), a follow-up examination every 6 months is indicated.
format Text
id pubmed-3029659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30296592011-03-16 Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas Saeed, Peerooz van Furth, Wouter R. Tanck, Michael Kooremans, Fabio Freling, Nicole Streekstra, Geert I. Regensburg, Noortje I. van der Sprenkel, Jan Willem Berkelbach Peerdeman, Saskia M. van Overbeeke, Jakobus J. Mourits, Maarten P. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Clinical Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the natural history and the growth rate of spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs). METHODS: Ninety patients with a diagnosis of SOM were included, and patient charts and imaging were evaluated. In a subset of 32 patients, volumetric studies were performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire group was 4 years (range, 1–15); the mean age was 47.8 (range, 26–93) years; 94% of the patients were female. The most common clinical signs and symptoms were proptosis (93%), visual deterioration (65%), retro-bulbar pain (23%) and diplopia (6%). In 35% of patients in this series, no visual deterioration occurred, and in 30% only mild proptosis was present. The median annual growth rate of the SOMs in the subset of 32 patients was 0.3 cm(3)/year (range, 0.03–1.8 cm(3)/year). We assessed a trend for more rapid tumour growth in younger patients and found the initial volume of the tumour (rho = 0.63) and of the soft tissue component (rho = 074) to be significantly related to the growth rate. CONCLUSION: SOMs are slow-growing tumours that cause primarily proptosis and visual deterioration. In a significant number of patients, these tumours cause minimal discomfort and symptomatology. Therefore, in the absence of risk factors, we advocate a “wait and see” policy. For patients with large SOMs or with a large soft tissue component at first visit or with fast growing SOMs (>1cm(3)/year), a follow-up examination every 6 months is indicated. Springer Vienna 2010-12-01 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3029659/ /pubmed/21120550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0878-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Saeed, Peerooz
van Furth, Wouter R.
Tanck, Michael
Kooremans, Fabio
Freling, Nicole
Streekstra, Geert I.
Regensburg, Noortje I.
van der Sprenkel, Jan Willem Berkelbach
Peerdeman, Saskia M.
van Overbeeke, Jakobus J.
Mourits, Maarten P.
Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas
title Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas
title_full Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas
title_fullStr Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas
title_full_unstemmed Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas
title_short Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas
title_sort natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3029659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21120550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0878-0
work_keys_str_mv AT saeedpeerooz naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT vanfurthwouterr naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT tanckmichael naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT kooremansfabio naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT frelingnicole naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT streekstrageerti naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT regensburgnoortjei naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT vandersprenkeljanwillemberkelbach naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT peerdemansaskiam naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT vanoverbeekejakobusj naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas
AT mouritsmaartenp naturalhistoryofsphenoorbitalmeningiomas