Cargando…

Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective study that evaluated the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for rectal cancer, in comparison with a case control series of open surgery (OS), during an 8-year period. METHODOLOGY: Between October 1998 and December 2006, 203 patients with rectal malign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koulas, Spyridon G., Pappas-Gogos, George, Spirou, Spyridon, Roustanis, Evangelos, Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E., Tsirves, Georgios, Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3030793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20202399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680809X12589998404489
_version_ 1782197296219291648
author Koulas, Spyridon G.
Pappas-Gogos, George
Spirou, Spyridon
Roustanis, Evangelos
Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E.
Tsirves, Georgios
Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C.
author_facet Koulas, Spyridon G.
Pappas-Gogos, George
Spirou, Spyridon
Roustanis, Evangelos
Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E.
Tsirves, Georgios
Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C.
author_sort Koulas, Spyridon G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective study that evaluated the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for rectal cancer, in comparison with a case control series of open surgery (OS), during an 8-year period. METHODOLOGY: Between October 1998 and December 2006, 203 patients with rectal malignancies underwent colectomy; 146 of them had colectomy with the traditional technique (OS), while 57 underwent resection of rectal cancer laparoscopically (LS). The LS group was compared with 60 patients from the OS group (selected from the 146 OS group patients), matched by size, sex, age, anatomical location of the tumor, type, extent of resection, and pathological stage. Data were obtained from patients' medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with the t test and chi-square test. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). RESULTS: Mean age of the LS group was 63.7±12 years versus 69±12 years in the OS group. There were more men than women in both the laparoscopic (33 males, 24 females) and OS groups (35 men, 25 women). The mean follow-up period was 38 months and 78 months for LS and OS groups, respectively. The procedure included low anterior resection (43 in LS and 45 in OS), and 13 patients in both groups underwent abdominoperineal resection and 3 transanal resections (2 in OS and 1 in LS). Mean tumor size was 4.2±2.12cm in the LS versus 5.2±2.02cm in the OS group. Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 4 patients (6.7%), all in the first 20 cases. Postoperative complications developed in 28 patients (11.7%), 13 in the LS group and 15 in the OS group. Median operative time was longer, but median blood loss was significantly lower in the LS group. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for the LS group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is feasible and safe for patients with rectal cancer and provides benefits during the postoperative period without increased morbidity or mortality.
format Text
id pubmed-3030793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30307932011-02-17 Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer Koulas, Spyridon G. Pappas-Gogos, George Spirou, Spyridon Roustanis, Evangelos Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E. Tsirves, Georgios Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective study that evaluated the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for rectal cancer, in comparison with a case control series of open surgery (OS), during an 8-year period. METHODOLOGY: Between October 1998 and December 2006, 203 patients with rectal malignancies underwent colectomy; 146 of them had colectomy with the traditional technique (OS), while 57 underwent resection of rectal cancer laparoscopically (LS). The LS group was compared with 60 patients from the OS group (selected from the 146 OS group patients), matched by size, sex, age, anatomical location of the tumor, type, extent of resection, and pathological stage. Data were obtained from patients' medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with the t test and chi-square test. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). RESULTS: Mean age of the LS group was 63.7±12 years versus 69±12 years in the OS group. There were more men than women in both the laparoscopic (33 males, 24 females) and OS groups (35 men, 25 women). The mean follow-up period was 38 months and 78 months for LS and OS groups, respectively. The procedure included low anterior resection (43 in LS and 45 in OS), and 13 patients in both groups underwent abdominoperineal resection and 3 transanal resections (2 in OS and 1 in LS). Mean tumor size was 4.2±2.12cm in the LS versus 5.2±2.02cm in the OS group. Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 4 patients (6.7%), all in the first 20 cases. Postoperative complications developed in 28 patients (11.7%), 13 in the LS group and 15 in the OS group. Median operative time was longer, but median blood loss was significantly lower in the LS group. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for the LS group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is feasible and safe for patients with rectal cancer and provides benefits during the postoperative period without increased morbidity or mortality. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3030793/ /pubmed/20202399 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680809X12589998404489 Text en © 2009 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Koulas, Spyridon G.
Pappas-Gogos, George
Spirou, Spyridon
Roustanis, Evangelos
Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos E.
Tsirves, Georgios
Tsimoyiannis, Evangelos C.
Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer
title Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer
title_full Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer
title_short Evaluations of Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy Versus Traditional Technique in Patients With Rectal Cancer
title_sort evaluations of laparoscopic proctocolectomy versus traditional technique in patients with rectal cancer
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3030793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20202399
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680809X12589998404489
work_keys_str_mv AT koulasspyridong evaluationsoflaparoscopicproctocolectomyversustraditionaltechniqueinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT pappasgogosgeorge evaluationsoflaparoscopicproctocolectomyversustraditionaltechniqueinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT spirouspyridon evaluationsoflaparoscopicproctocolectomyversustraditionaltechniqueinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT roustanisevangelos evaluationsoflaparoscopicproctocolectomyversustraditionaltechniqueinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT tsimogianniskonstantinose evaluationsoflaparoscopicproctocolectomyversustraditionaltechniqueinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT tsirvesgeorgios evaluationsoflaparoscopicproctocolectomyversustraditionaltechniqueinpatientswithrectalcancer
AT tsimoyiannisevangelosc evaluationsoflaparoscopicproctocolectomyversustraditionaltechniqueinpatientswithrectalcancer