Cargando…
Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial)
BACKGROUND: There is a rise in incidence of esophageal carcinoma due to increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma. Probably the only curative option to date is the use of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection. Traditional open esophageal resection is associated with a high morbidity and mo...
Autores principales: | Biere, Surya SAY, Maas, Kirsten W, Bonavina, Luigi, Garcia, Josep Roig, van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I, Rosman, Camiel, Sosef, Meindert N, de Lange, Elly SM, Bonjer, H Jaap, Cuesta, Miguel A, van der Peet, Donald L |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21226918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial
por: Maas, K. W., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: current status and future direction
por: Maas, Kirsten, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy
por: van Workum, Frans, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: van Workum, Frans, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers
por: Maas, K. W., et al.
Publicado: (2012)