Cargando…
Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The effect of footwear on the gait of children is poorly understood. This systematic review synthesises the evidence of the biomechanical effects of shoes on children during walking and running. METHODS: Study inclusion criteria were: barefoot and shod conditions; healthy children aged ≤...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21244647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-3 |
_version_ | 1782197326965637120 |
---|---|
author | Wegener, Caleb Hunt, Adrienne E Vanwanseele, Benedicte Burns, Joshua Smith, Richard M |
author_facet | Wegener, Caleb Hunt, Adrienne E Vanwanseele, Benedicte Burns, Joshua Smith, Richard M |
author_sort | Wegener, Caleb |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effect of footwear on the gait of children is poorly understood. This systematic review synthesises the evidence of the biomechanical effects of shoes on children during walking and running. METHODS: Study inclusion criteria were: barefoot and shod conditions; healthy children aged ≤ 16 years; sample size of n > 1. Novelty footwear was excluded. Studies were located by online database-searching, hand-searching and contact with experts. Two authors selected studies and assessed study methodology using the Quality Index. Meta-analysis of continuous variables for homogeneous studies was undertaken using the inverse variance approach. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Heterogeneity was measured by I(2). Where I(2 )> 25%, a random-effects model analysis was used and where I(2 )< 25%, a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. Sample size ranged from 4-898. Median Quality Index was 20/32 (range 11-27). Five studies randomised shoe order, six studies standardised footwear. Shod walking increased: velocity, step length, step time, base of support, double-support time, stance time, time to toe-off, sagittal tibia-rearfoot range of motion (ROM), sagittal tibia-foot ROM, ankle max-plantarflexion, Ankle ROM, foot lift to max-plantarflexion, 'subtalar' rotation ROM, knee sagittal ROM and tibialis anterior activity. Shod walking decreased: cadence, single-support time, ankle max-dorsiflexion, ankle at foot-lift, hallux ROM, arch length change, foot torsion, forefoot supination, forefoot width and midfoot ROM in all planes. Shod running decreased: long axis maximum tibial-acceleration, shock-wave transmission as a ratio of maximum tibial-acceleration, ankle plantarflexion at foot strike, knee angular velocity and tibial swing velocity. No variables increased during shod running. CONCLUSIONS: Shoes affect the gait of children. With shoes, children walk faster by taking longer steps with greater ankle and knee motion and increased tibialis anterior activity. Shoes reduce foot motion and increase the support phases of the gait cycle. During running, shoes reduce swing phase leg speed, attenuate some shock and encourage a rearfoot strike pattern. The long-term effect of these changes on growth and development are currently unknown. The impact of footwear on gait should be considered when assessing the paediatric patient and evaluating the effect of shoe or in-shoe interventions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3031211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30312112011-02-01 Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wegener, Caleb Hunt, Adrienne E Vanwanseele, Benedicte Burns, Joshua Smith, Richard M J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: The effect of footwear on the gait of children is poorly understood. This systematic review synthesises the evidence of the biomechanical effects of shoes on children during walking and running. METHODS: Study inclusion criteria were: barefoot and shod conditions; healthy children aged ≤ 16 years; sample size of n > 1. Novelty footwear was excluded. Studies were located by online database-searching, hand-searching and contact with experts. Two authors selected studies and assessed study methodology using the Quality Index. Meta-analysis of continuous variables for homogeneous studies was undertaken using the inverse variance approach. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Heterogeneity was measured by I(2). Where I(2 )> 25%, a random-effects model analysis was used and where I(2 )< 25%, a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. Sample size ranged from 4-898. Median Quality Index was 20/32 (range 11-27). Five studies randomised shoe order, six studies standardised footwear. Shod walking increased: velocity, step length, step time, base of support, double-support time, stance time, time to toe-off, sagittal tibia-rearfoot range of motion (ROM), sagittal tibia-foot ROM, ankle max-plantarflexion, Ankle ROM, foot lift to max-plantarflexion, 'subtalar' rotation ROM, knee sagittal ROM and tibialis anterior activity. Shod walking decreased: cadence, single-support time, ankle max-dorsiflexion, ankle at foot-lift, hallux ROM, arch length change, foot torsion, forefoot supination, forefoot width and midfoot ROM in all planes. Shod running decreased: long axis maximum tibial-acceleration, shock-wave transmission as a ratio of maximum tibial-acceleration, ankle plantarflexion at foot strike, knee angular velocity and tibial swing velocity. No variables increased during shod running. CONCLUSIONS: Shoes affect the gait of children. With shoes, children walk faster by taking longer steps with greater ankle and knee motion and increased tibialis anterior activity. Shoes reduce foot motion and increase the support phases of the gait cycle. During running, shoes reduce swing phase leg speed, attenuate some shock and encourage a rearfoot strike pattern. The long-term effect of these changes on growth and development are currently unknown. The impact of footwear on gait should be considered when assessing the paediatric patient and evaluating the effect of shoe or in-shoe interventions. BioMed Central 2011-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3031211/ /pubmed/21244647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-3 Text en Copyright ©2011 Wegener et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Wegener, Caleb Hunt, Adrienne E Vanwanseele, Benedicte Burns, Joshua Smith, Richard M Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effect of children's shoes on gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21244647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wegenercaleb effectofchildrensshoesongaitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huntadriennee effectofchildrensshoesongaitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanwanseelebenedicte effectofchildrensshoesongaitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT burnsjoshua effectofchildrensshoesongaitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT smithrichardm effectofchildrensshoesongaitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |