Cargando…

Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors

Adult learning-induced sensory cortex plasticity results in enhanced action potential rates in neurons that have the most relevant information for the task, or those that respond strongly to one sensory stimulus but weakly to its comparison stimulus. Current theories suggest this plasticity is cause...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spingath, Elsie Y., Kang, Hyun Sug, Plummer, Thane, Blake, David T.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21297962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015342
_version_ 1782197352573960192
author Spingath, Elsie Y.
Kang, Hyun Sug
Plummer, Thane
Blake, David T.
author_facet Spingath, Elsie Y.
Kang, Hyun Sug
Plummer, Thane
Blake, David T.
author_sort Spingath, Elsie Y.
collection PubMed
description Adult learning-induced sensory cortex plasticity results in enhanced action potential rates in neurons that have the most relevant information for the task, or those that respond strongly to one sensory stimulus but weakly to its comparison stimulus. Current theories suggest this plasticity is caused when target stimulus evoked activity is enhanced by reward signals from neuromodulatory nuclei. Prior work has found evidence suggestive of nonselective enhancement of neural responses, and suppression of responses to task distractors, but the differences in these effects between detection and discrimination have not been directly tested. Using cortical implants, we defined physiological responses in macaque somatosensory cortex during serial, matched, detection and discrimination tasks. Nonselective increases in neural responsiveness were observed during detection learning. Suppression of responses to task distractors was observed during discrimination learning, and this suppression was specific to cortical locations that sampled responses to the task distractor before learning. Changes in receptive field size were measured as the area of skin that had a significant response to a constant magnitude stimulus, and these areal changes paralleled changes in responsiveness. From before detection learning until after discrimination learning, the enduring changes were selective suppression of cortical locations responsive to task distractors, and nonselective enhancement of responsiveness at cortical locations selective for target and control skin sites. A comparison of observations in prior studies with the observed plasticity effects suggests that the non-selective response enhancement and selective suppression suffice to explain known plasticity phenomena in simple spatial tasks. This work suggests that differential responsiveness to task targets and distractors in primary sensory cortex for a simple spatial detection and discrimination task arise from nonselective increases in response over a broad cortical locus that includes the representation of the task target, and selective suppression of responses to the task distractor within this locus.
format Text
id pubmed-3031528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30315282011-02-04 Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors Spingath, Elsie Y. Kang, Hyun Sug Plummer, Thane Blake, David T. PLoS One Research Article Adult learning-induced sensory cortex plasticity results in enhanced action potential rates in neurons that have the most relevant information for the task, or those that respond strongly to one sensory stimulus but weakly to its comparison stimulus. Current theories suggest this plasticity is caused when target stimulus evoked activity is enhanced by reward signals from neuromodulatory nuclei. Prior work has found evidence suggestive of nonselective enhancement of neural responses, and suppression of responses to task distractors, but the differences in these effects between detection and discrimination have not been directly tested. Using cortical implants, we defined physiological responses in macaque somatosensory cortex during serial, matched, detection and discrimination tasks. Nonselective increases in neural responsiveness were observed during detection learning. Suppression of responses to task distractors was observed during discrimination learning, and this suppression was specific to cortical locations that sampled responses to the task distractor before learning. Changes in receptive field size were measured as the area of skin that had a significant response to a constant magnitude stimulus, and these areal changes paralleled changes in responsiveness. From before detection learning until after discrimination learning, the enduring changes were selective suppression of cortical locations responsive to task distractors, and nonselective enhancement of responsiveness at cortical locations selective for target and control skin sites. A comparison of observations in prior studies with the observed plasticity effects suggests that the non-selective response enhancement and selective suppression suffice to explain known plasticity phenomena in simple spatial tasks. This work suggests that differential responsiveness to task targets and distractors in primary sensory cortex for a simple spatial detection and discrimination task arise from nonselective increases in response over a broad cortical locus that includes the representation of the task target, and selective suppression of responses to the task distractor within this locus. Public Library of Science 2011-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3031528/ /pubmed/21297962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015342 Text en Spingath et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Spingath, Elsie Y.
Kang, Hyun Sug
Plummer, Thane
Blake, David T.
Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors
title Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors
title_full Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors
title_fullStr Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors
title_full_unstemmed Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors
title_short Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors
title_sort different neuroplasticity for task targets and distractors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21297962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015342
work_keys_str_mv AT spingathelsiey differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors
AT kanghyunsug differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors
AT plummerthane differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors
AT blakedavidt differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors