Cargando…
Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors
Adult learning-induced sensory cortex plasticity results in enhanced action potential rates in neurons that have the most relevant information for the task, or those that respond strongly to one sensory stimulus but weakly to its comparison stimulus. Current theories suggest this plasticity is cause...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21297962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015342 |
_version_ | 1782197352573960192 |
---|---|
author | Spingath, Elsie Y. Kang, Hyun Sug Plummer, Thane Blake, David T. |
author_facet | Spingath, Elsie Y. Kang, Hyun Sug Plummer, Thane Blake, David T. |
author_sort | Spingath, Elsie Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adult learning-induced sensory cortex plasticity results in enhanced action potential rates in neurons that have the most relevant information for the task, or those that respond strongly to one sensory stimulus but weakly to its comparison stimulus. Current theories suggest this plasticity is caused when target stimulus evoked activity is enhanced by reward signals from neuromodulatory nuclei. Prior work has found evidence suggestive of nonselective enhancement of neural responses, and suppression of responses to task distractors, but the differences in these effects between detection and discrimination have not been directly tested. Using cortical implants, we defined physiological responses in macaque somatosensory cortex during serial, matched, detection and discrimination tasks. Nonselective increases in neural responsiveness were observed during detection learning. Suppression of responses to task distractors was observed during discrimination learning, and this suppression was specific to cortical locations that sampled responses to the task distractor before learning. Changes in receptive field size were measured as the area of skin that had a significant response to a constant magnitude stimulus, and these areal changes paralleled changes in responsiveness. From before detection learning until after discrimination learning, the enduring changes were selective suppression of cortical locations responsive to task distractors, and nonselective enhancement of responsiveness at cortical locations selective for target and control skin sites. A comparison of observations in prior studies with the observed plasticity effects suggests that the non-selective response enhancement and selective suppression suffice to explain known plasticity phenomena in simple spatial tasks. This work suggests that differential responsiveness to task targets and distractors in primary sensory cortex for a simple spatial detection and discrimination task arise from nonselective increases in response over a broad cortical locus that includes the representation of the task target, and selective suppression of responses to the task distractor within this locus. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3031528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30315282011-02-04 Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors Spingath, Elsie Y. Kang, Hyun Sug Plummer, Thane Blake, David T. PLoS One Research Article Adult learning-induced sensory cortex plasticity results in enhanced action potential rates in neurons that have the most relevant information for the task, or those that respond strongly to one sensory stimulus but weakly to its comparison stimulus. Current theories suggest this plasticity is caused when target stimulus evoked activity is enhanced by reward signals from neuromodulatory nuclei. Prior work has found evidence suggestive of nonselective enhancement of neural responses, and suppression of responses to task distractors, but the differences in these effects between detection and discrimination have not been directly tested. Using cortical implants, we defined physiological responses in macaque somatosensory cortex during serial, matched, detection and discrimination tasks. Nonselective increases in neural responsiveness were observed during detection learning. Suppression of responses to task distractors was observed during discrimination learning, and this suppression was specific to cortical locations that sampled responses to the task distractor before learning. Changes in receptive field size were measured as the area of skin that had a significant response to a constant magnitude stimulus, and these areal changes paralleled changes in responsiveness. From before detection learning until after discrimination learning, the enduring changes were selective suppression of cortical locations responsive to task distractors, and nonselective enhancement of responsiveness at cortical locations selective for target and control skin sites. A comparison of observations in prior studies with the observed plasticity effects suggests that the non-selective response enhancement and selective suppression suffice to explain known plasticity phenomena in simple spatial tasks. This work suggests that differential responsiveness to task targets and distractors in primary sensory cortex for a simple spatial detection and discrimination task arise from nonselective increases in response over a broad cortical locus that includes the representation of the task target, and selective suppression of responses to the task distractor within this locus. Public Library of Science 2011-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3031528/ /pubmed/21297962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015342 Text en Spingath et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Spingath, Elsie Y. Kang, Hyun Sug Plummer, Thane Blake, David T. Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors |
title | Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors |
title_full | Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors |
title_fullStr | Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors |
title_full_unstemmed | Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors |
title_short | Different Neuroplasticity for Task Targets and Distractors |
title_sort | different neuroplasticity for task targets and distractors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21297962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015342 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spingathelsiey differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors AT kanghyunsug differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors AT plummerthane differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors AT blakedavidt differentneuroplasticityfortasktargetsanddistractors |