Cargando…

Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress?

BACKGROUND: Resource allocation and integration of services have been of interest recently to achieve health-related Millennium Development Goals. This paper analyses the extent to which countries receiving funding in HIV were able to invest in activities in the area of sexual and reproductive healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komatsu, Ryuichi, Lee, Donna, Lusti-Narasimhan, Manjula, Martineau, Tim, Vinh-Thomas, Elmar, Beer, Daniel Low, Atun, Rifat
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3034082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20630980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.092940
_version_ 1782197645469548544
author Komatsu, Ryuichi
Lee, Donna
Lusti-Narasimhan, Manjula
Martineau, Tim
Vinh-Thomas, Elmar
Beer, Daniel Low
Atun, Rifat
author_facet Komatsu, Ryuichi
Lee, Donna
Lusti-Narasimhan, Manjula
Martineau, Tim
Vinh-Thomas, Elmar
Beer, Daniel Low
Atun, Rifat
author_sort Komatsu, Ryuichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resource allocation and integration of services have been of interest recently to achieve health-related Millennium Development Goals. This paper analyses the extent to which countries receiving funding in HIV were able to invest in activities in the area of sexual and reproductive health (SRH). METHODS: The authors screened the Global Fund grants data with an aggregate investment of US$16 billion in 140 countries to identify indicators revealing typical SRH services. The analysis focused on the ‘Top Ten’ internationally agreed indicators and used international guidelines and frameworks to define services for SRH and opportunities for ‘linkage’ between HIV and SRH services. RESULTS: As of December 2008, 238 of all HIV grants (n=252) from 133 countries included 1620 service delivery indicators related to SRH. The budgets amounted to US$9.1 billion with US$5.9 billion committed and US$4 billion disbursed. Services included (1) prevention of mother to child transmission for 445 000 HIV-positive pregnant women, (2) 5.7 million care and support services, (3) 1.2 billion condoms delivered, (4) 4.4 million episodes of sexually transmitted infections treated, (5) 61 million counselling and testing encounters, and (6) 11.6 million behavioural change communication (BCC) outreach services for people at high risk and 64.5 million BCC activities for the general population, including youth. Information on the linkage and integration of SRH–HIV services was limited. CONCLUSION: Around 94% of HIV programmes supported SRH-related activities. However, there is a need to systematically capture data on SRH–HIV service integration to understand the benefits of linking these services.
format Text
id pubmed-3034082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30340822011-02-09 Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress? Komatsu, Ryuichi Lee, Donna Lusti-Narasimhan, Manjula Martineau, Tim Vinh-Thomas, Elmar Beer, Daniel Low Atun, Rifat J Epidemiol Community Health Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice BACKGROUND: Resource allocation and integration of services have been of interest recently to achieve health-related Millennium Development Goals. This paper analyses the extent to which countries receiving funding in HIV were able to invest in activities in the area of sexual and reproductive health (SRH). METHODS: The authors screened the Global Fund grants data with an aggregate investment of US$16 billion in 140 countries to identify indicators revealing typical SRH services. The analysis focused on the ‘Top Ten’ internationally agreed indicators and used international guidelines and frameworks to define services for SRH and opportunities for ‘linkage’ between HIV and SRH services. RESULTS: As of December 2008, 238 of all HIV grants (n=252) from 133 countries included 1620 service delivery indicators related to SRH. The budgets amounted to US$9.1 billion with US$5.9 billion committed and US$4 billion disbursed. Services included (1) prevention of mother to child transmission for 445 000 HIV-positive pregnant women, (2) 5.7 million care and support services, (3) 1.2 billion condoms delivered, (4) 4.4 million episodes of sexually transmitted infections treated, (5) 61 million counselling and testing encounters, and (6) 11.6 million behavioural change communication (BCC) outreach services for people at high risk and 64.5 million BCC activities for the general population, including youth. Information on the linkage and integration of SRH–HIV services was limited. CONCLUSION: Around 94% of HIV programmes supported SRH-related activities. However, there is a need to systematically capture data on SRH–HIV service integration to understand the benefits of linking these services. BMJ Group 2010-07-14 2011-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3034082/ /pubmed/20630980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.092940 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice
Komatsu, Ryuichi
Lee, Donna
Lusti-Narasimhan, Manjula
Martineau, Tim
Vinh-Thomas, Elmar
Beer, Daniel Low
Atun, Rifat
Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress?
title Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress?
title_full Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress?
title_fullStr Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress?
title_full_unstemmed Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress?
title_short Sexual and reproductive health activities in HIV programmes: can we monitor progress?
title_sort sexual and reproductive health activities in hiv programmes: can we monitor progress?
topic Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3034082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20630980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.092940
work_keys_str_mv AT komatsuryuichi sexualandreproductivehealthactivitiesinhivprogrammescanwemonitorprogress
AT leedonna sexualandreproductivehealthactivitiesinhivprogrammescanwemonitorprogress
AT lustinarasimhanmanjula sexualandreproductivehealthactivitiesinhivprogrammescanwemonitorprogress
AT martineautim sexualandreproductivehealthactivitiesinhivprogrammescanwemonitorprogress
AT vinhthomaselmar sexualandreproductivehealthactivitiesinhivprogrammescanwemonitorprogress
AT beerdaniellow sexualandreproductivehealthactivitiesinhivprogrammescanwemonitorprogress
AT atunrifat sexualandreproductivehealthactivitiesinhivprogrammescanwemonitorprogress