Cargando…
Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison
The pragmatic species concept for Bacteria and Archaea is ultimately based on DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH). While enabling the taxonomist, in principle, to obtain an estimate of the overall similarity between the genomes of two strains, this technique is tedious and error-prone and cannot be used to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Michigan State University
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.531120 |
_version_ | 1782197746996871168 |
---|---|
author | Auch, Alexander F. von Jan, Mathias Klenk, Hans-Peter Göker, Markus |
author_facet | Auch, Alexander F. von Jan, Mathias Klenk, Hans-Peter Göker, Markus |
author_sort | Auch, Alexander F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The pragmatic species concept for Bacteria and Archaea is ultimately based on DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH). While enabling the taxonomist, in principle, to obtain an estimate of the overall similarity between the genomes of two strains, this technique is tedious and error-prone and cannot be used to incrementally build up a comparative database. Recent technological progress in the area of genome sequencing calls for bioinformatics methods to replace the wet-lab DDH by in-silico genome-to-genome comparison. Here we investigate state-of-the-art methods for inferring whole-genome distances in their ability to mimic DDH. Algorithms to efficiently determine high-scoring segment pairs or maximally unique matches perform well as a basis of inferring intergenomic distances. The examined distance functions, which are able to cope with heavily reduced genomes and repetitive sequence regions, outperform previously described ones regarding the correlation with and error ratios in emulating DDH. Simulation of incompletely sequenced genomes indicates that some distance formulas are very robust against missing fractions of genomic information. Digitally derived genome-to-genome distances show a better correlation with 16S rRNA gene sequence distances than DDH values. The future perspectives of genome-informed taxonomy are discussed, and the investigated methods are made available as a web service for genome-based species delineation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3035253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Michigan State University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30352532011-02-08 Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison Auch, Alexander F. von Jan, Mathias Klenk, Hans-Peter Göker, Markus Stand Genomic Sci Research Articles The pragmatic species concept for Bacteria and Archaea is ultimately based on DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH). While enabling the taxonomist, in principle, to obtain an estimate of the overall similarity between the genomes of two strains, this technique is tedious and error-prone and cannot be used to incrementally build up a comparative database. Recent technological progress in the area of genome sequencing calls for bioinformatics methods to replace the wet-lab DDH by in-silico genome-to-genome comparison. Here we investigate state-of-the-art methods for inferring whole-genome distances in their ability to mimic DDH. Algorithms to efficiently determine high-scoring segment pairs or maximally unique matches perform well as a basis of inferring intergenomic distances. The examined distance functions, which are able to cope with heavily reduced genomes and repetitive sequence regions, outperform previously described ones regarding the correlation with and error ratios in emulating DDH. Simulation of incompletely sequenced genomes indicates that some distance formulas are very robust against missing fractions of genomic information. Digitally derived genome-to-genome distances show a better correlation with 16S rRNA gene sequence distances than DDH values. The future perspectives of genome-informed taxonomy are discussed, and the investigated methods are made available as a web service for genome-based species delineation. Michigan State University 2010-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3035253/ /pubmed/21304684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.531120 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Auch, Alexander F. von Jan, Mathias Klenk, Hans-Peter Göker, Markus Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison |
title | Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison |
title_full | Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison |
title_fullStr | Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison |
title_short | Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison |
title_sort | digital dna-dna hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.531120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT auchalexanderf digitaldnadnahybridizationformicrobialspeciesdelineationbymeansofgenometogenomesequencecomparison AT vonjanmathias digitaldnadnahybridizationformicrobialspeciesdelineationbymeansofgenometogenomesequencecomparison AT klenkhanspeter digitaldnadnahybridizationformicrobialspeciesdelineationbymeansofgenometogenomesequencecomparison AT gokermarkus digitaldnadnahybridizationformicrobialspeciesdelineationbymeansofgenometogenomesequencecomparison |