Cargando…
Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology
Quantitative or numerical metrics of protein function specificity made possible by the Gene Ontology are useful in that they enable development of distance or similarity measures between protein functions. Here we describe how to calculate four measures of function specificity for GO terms: 1) numbe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Michigan State University
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304708 http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.561626 |
_version_ | 1782197754191151104 |
---|---|
author | Louie, Brenton Bergen, Silas Higdon, Roger Kolker, Eugene |
author_facet | Louie, Brenton Bergen, Silas Higdon, Roger Kolker, Eugene |
author_sort | Louie, Brenton |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantitative or numerical metrics of protein function specificity made possible by the Gene Ontology are useful in that they enable development of distance or similarity measures between protein functions. Here we describe how to calculate four measures of function specificity for GO terms: 1) number of ancestor terms; 2) number of offspring terms; 3) proportion of terms; and 4) Information Content (IC). We discuss the relationship between the metrics and the strengths and weaknesses of each. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3035283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Michigan State University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30352832011-02-08 Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology Louie, Brenton Bergen, Silas Higdon, Roger Kolker, Eugene Stand Genomic Sci Standard Operating Procedures Quantitative or numerical metrics of protein function specificity made possible by the Gene Ontology are useful in that they enable development of distance or similarity measures between protein functions. Here we describe how to calculate four measures of function specificity for GO terms: 1) number of ancestor terms; 2) number of offspring terms; 3) proportion of terms; and 4) Information Content (IC). We discuss the relationship between the metrics and the strengths and weaknesses of each. Michigan State University 2010-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3035283/ /pubmed/21304708 http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.561626 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Standard Operating Procedures Louie, Brenton Bergen, Silas Higdon, Roger Kolker, Eugene Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology |
title | Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology |
title_full | Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology |
title_short | Quantifying Protein Function Specificity in the Gene Ontology |
title_sort | quantifying protein function specificity in the gene ontology |
topic | Standard Operating Procedures |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304708 http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.561626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT louiebrenton quantifyingproteinfunctionspecificityinthegeneontology AT bergensilas quantifyingproteinfunctionspecificityinthegeneontology AT higdonroger quantifyingproteinfunctionspecificityinthegeneontology AT kolkereugene quantifyingproteinfunctionspecificityinthegeneontology |