Cargando…

Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs

BACKGROUND: The VL elimination strategy requires cost-effective tools for case detection and management. This intervention study tests the yield, feasibility and cost of 4 different active case detection (ACD) strategies (camp, index case, incentive and blanket approach) in VL endemic districts of I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Shri Prakash, Hirve, Siddhivinayak, Huda, M. Mamun, Banjara, Megha Raj, Kumar, Narendra, Mondal, Dinesh, Sundar, Shyam, Das, Pradeep, Gurung, Chitra Kumar, Rijal, Suman, Thakur, C. P., Varghese, Beena, Kroeger, Axel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000960
_version_ 1782197806971224064
author Singh, Shri Prakash
Hirve, Siddhivinayak
Huda, M. Mamun
Banjara, Megha Raj
Kumar, Narendra
Mondal, Dinesh
Sundar, Shyam
Das, Pradeep
Gurung, Chitra Kumar
Rijal, Suman
Thakur, C. P.
Varghese, Beena
Kroeger, Axel
author_facet Singh, Shri Prakash
Hirve, Siddhivinayak
Huda, M. Mamun
Banjara, Megha Raj
Kumar, Narendra
Mondal, Dinesh
Sundar, Shyam
Das, Pradeep
Gurung, Chitra Kumar
Rijal, Suman
Thakur, C. P.
Varghese, Beena
Kroeger, Axel
author_sort Singh, Shri Prakash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The VL elimination strategy requires cost-effective tools for case detection and management. This intervention study tests the yield, feasibility and cost of 4 different active case detection (ACD) strategies (camp, index case, incentive and blanket approach) in VL endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: First, VL screening (fever more than 14 days, splenomegaly, rK39 test) was performed in camps. This was followed by house to house screening (blanket approach). An analysis of secondary VL cases in the neighborhood of index cases was simulated (index case approach). A second screening round was repeated 4–6 months later. In another sub-district in India and Nepal, health workers received incentives for detecting new VL cases over a 4 month period (incentive approach). This was followed by house screening for undetected cases. A total of 28 new VL cases were identified by blanket approach in the 1(st) screening round, and used as ACD gold standard. Of these, the camp approach identified 22 (sensitivity 78.6%), index case approach identified 12 (sensitivity – 42.9%), and incentive approach identified 23 new VL cases out of 29 cases detected by the house screening (sensitivity – 79.3%). The effort required to detect a new VL case varied (blanket approach – 1092 households, incentive approach – 978 households; index case approach – 788 households had to be screened). The cost per new case detected varied (camp approach $21 – $661; index case approach $149 – $200; incentive based approach $50 – $543; blanket screening $112 – $629). The 2(nd) screening round yielded 20 new VL cases. Sixty and nine new PKDL cases were detected in the first and second round respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: ACD in the VL elimination campaign has a high yield of new cases at programme costs which vary according to the screening method chosen. Countries need the right mix of approaches according to the epidemiological profile, affordability and organizational feasibility.
format Text
id pubmed-3035672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30356722011-02-23 Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs Singh, Shri Prakash Hirve, Siddhivinayak Huda, M. Mamun Banjara, Megha Raj Kumar, Narendra Mondal, Dinesh Sundar, Shyam Das, Pradeep Gurung, Chitra Kumar Rijal, Suman Thakur, C. P. Varghese, Beena Kroeger, Axel PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The VL elimination strategy requires cost-effective tools for case detection and management. This intervention study tests the yield, feasibility and cost of 4 different active case detection (ACD) strategies (camp, index case, incentive and blanket approach) in VL endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: First, VL screening (fever more than 14 days, splenomegaly, rK39 test) was performed in camps. This was followed by house to house screening (blanket approach). An analysis of secondary VL cases in the neighborhood of index cases was simulated (index case approach). A second screening round was repeated 4–6 months later. In another sub-district in India and Nepal, health workers received incentives for detecting new VL cases over a 4 month period (incentive approach). This was followed by house screening for undetected cases. A total of 28 new VL cases were identified by blanket approach in the 1(st) screening round, and used as ACD gold standard. Of these, the camp approach identified 22 (sensitivity 78.6%), index case approach identified 12 (sensitivity – 42.9%), and incentive approach identified 23 new VL cases out of 29 cases detected by the house screening (sensitivity – 79.3%). The effort required to detect a new VL case varied (blanket approach – 1092 households, incentive approach – 978 households; index case approach – 788 households had to be screened). The cost per new case detected varied (camp approach $21 – $661; index case approach $149 – $200; incentive based approach $50 – $543; blanket screening $112 – $629). The 2(nd) screening round yielded 20 new VL cases. Sixty and nine new PKDL cases were detected in the first and second round respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: ACD in the VL elimination campaign has a high yield of new cases at programme costs which vary according to the screening method chosen. Countries need the right mix of approaches according to the epidemiological profile, affordability and organizational feasibility. Public Library of Science 2011-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3035672/ /pubmed/21347452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000960 Text en Singh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Singh, Shri Prakash
Hirve, Siddhivinayak
Huda, M. Mamun
Banjara, Megha Raj
Kumar, Narendra
Mondal, Dinesh
Sundar, Shyam
Das, Pradeep
Gurung, Chitra Kumar
Rijal, Suman
Thakur, C. P.
Varghese, Beena
Kroeger, Axel
Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs
title Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs
title_full Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs
title_fullStr Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs
title_full_unstemmed Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs
title_short Options for Active Case Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Endemic Districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, Comparing Yield, Feasibility and Costs
title_sort options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of india, nepal and bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000960
work_keys_str_mv AT singhshriprakash optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT hirvesiddhivinayak optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT hudammamun optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT banjaramegharaj optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT kumarnarendra optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT mondaldinesh optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT sundarshyam optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT daspradeep optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT gurungchitrakumar optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT rijalsuman optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT thakurcp optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT varghesebeena optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts
AT kroegeraxel optionsforactivecasedetectionofvisceralleishmaniasisinendemicdistrictsofindianepalandbangladeshcomparingyieldfeasibilityandcosts