Cargando…

A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to find a method of improving the accuracy of fetal birth weight estimation on the basis of traditional ultrasonographic measurements of the head, thorax, and femur at term. In this context, we analyzed a novel regression method comparing to exi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siggelkow, W., Schmidt, M., Skala, C., Boehm, D., von Forstner, S., Koelbl, H., Tresch, A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20174814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8
_version_ 1782197812552794112
author Siggelkow, W.
Schmidt, M.
Skala, C.
Boehm, D.
von Forstner, S.
Koelbl, H.
Tresch, A.
author_facet Siggelkow, W.
Schmidt, M.
Skala, C.
Boehm, D.
von Forstner, S.
Koelbl, H.
Tresch, A.
author_sort Siggelkow, W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to find a method of improving the accuracy of fetal birth weight estimation on the basis of traditional ultrasonographic measurements of the head, thorax, and femur at term. In this context, we analyzed a novel regression method comparing to existing algorithms. METHODS: The delivery records of two hospitals were searched for women who delivered macrosomic infants, and the patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed in order to derive clinical and ultrasonographic data at term. A total of 223 patients with macrosomic infants (birth weight > 4,000 g) were identified. These patients were complemented by data for 212 women who had ultrasound fetal assessments of less than 4,000 g. We used the method of isotonic regression to construct a birth weight prediction function that increases monotonically with each of the input variables and which minimizes the empirical quadratic loss. RESULTS: A suspicion of macrosomia was based on a history of macrosomia, fundal height, and sonographic weight estimation >4,000 g. The mean period between ultrasound weight estimation and delivery was 7.2 days. The ability of the biometric algorithms developed to predict fetal weight at term ranged between a mean absolute error of 312 and 344 g, given a confidence interval of 95%. We demonstrate that predictions of birth weight on the basis of ultrasound data can be improved significantly, if an isotonic regression model is used instead of a linear regression model. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ultrasound detection of macrosomia can be improved using the isotonic regression method.
format Text
id pubmed-3035787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30357872011-03-16 A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term Siggelkow, W. Schmidt, M. Skala, C. Boehm, D. von Forstner, S. Koelbl, H. Tresch, A. Arch Gynecol Obstet Materno-fetal Medicine OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to find a method of improving the accuracy of fetal birth weight estimation on the basis of traditional ultrasonographic measurements of the head, thorax, and femur at term. In this context, we analyzed a novel regression method comparing to existing algorithms. METHODS: The delivery records of two hospitals were searched for women who delivered macrosomic infants, and the patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed in order to derive clinical and ultrasonographic data at term. A total of 223 patients with macrosomic infants (birth weight > 4,000 g) were identified. These patients were complemented by data for 212 women who had ultrasound fetal assessments of less than 4,000 g. We used the method of isotonic regression to construct a birth weight prediction function that increases monotonically with each of the input variables and which minimizes the empirical quadratic loss. RESULTS: A suspicion of macrosomia was based on a history of macrosomia, fundal height, and sonographic weight estimation >4,000 g. The mean period between ultrasound weight estimation and delivery was 7.2 days. The ability of the biometric algorithms developed to predict fetal weight at term ranged between a mean absolute error of 312 and 344 g, given a confidence interval of 95%. We demonstrate that predictions of birth weight on the basis of ultrasound data can be improved significantly, if an isotonic regression model is used instead of a linear regression model. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ultrasound detection of macrosomia can be improved using the isotonic regression method. Springer-Verlag 2010-02-20 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3035787/ /pubmed/20174814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Materno-fetal Medicine
Siggelkow, W.
Schmidt, M.
Skala, C.
Boehm, D.
von Forstner, S.
Koelbl, H.
Tresch, A.
A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term
title A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term
title_full A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term
title_fullStr A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term
title_full_unstemmed A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term
title_short A new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term
title_sort new algorithm for improving fetal weight estimation from ultrasound data at term
topic Materno-fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20174814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1390-8
work_keys_str_mv AT siggelkoww anewalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT schmidtm anewalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT skalac anewalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT boehmd anewalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT vonforstners anewalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT koelblh anewalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT trescha anewalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT siggelkoww newalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT schmidtm newalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT skalac newalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT boehmd newalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT vonforstners newalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT koelblh newalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm
AT trescha newalgorithmforimprovingfetalweightestimationfromultrasounddataatterm