Cargando…
Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping
Immunophenotypic characterization of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD) is becoming increasingly complex due to usage of progressively larger panels of reagents and a high number of World Health Organization (WHO) entities. Typically, data analysis is performed separately for each...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20844562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.160 |
_version_ | 1782197829021728768 |
---|---|
author | Costa, E S Pedreira, C E Barrena, S Lecrevisse, Q Flores, J Quijano, S Almeida, J del Carmen García- Macias, M Bottcher, S Van Dongen, J J M Orfao, A |
author_facet | Costa, E S Pedreira, C E Barrena, S Lecrevisse, Q Flores, J Quijano, S Almeida, J del Carmen García- Macias, M Bottcher, S Van Dongen, J J M Orfao, A |
author_sort | Costa, E S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Immunophenotypic characterization of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD) is becoming increasingly complex due to usage of progressively larger panels of reagents and a high number of World Health Organization (WHO) entities. Typically, data analysis is performed separately for each stained aliquot of a sample; subsequently, an expert interprets the overall immunophenotypic profile (IP) of neoplastic B-cells and assigns it to specific diagnostic categories. We constructed a principal component analysis (PCA)-based tool to guide immunophenotypic classification of B-CLPD. Three reference groups of immunophenotypic data files—B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias (B-CLL; n=10), mantle cell (MCL; n=10) and follicular lymphomas (FL; n=10)—were built. Subsequently, each of the 175 cases studied was evaluated and assigned to either one of the three reference groups or to none of them (other B-CLPD). Most cases (89%) were correctly assigned to their corresponding WHO diagnostic group with overall positive and negative predictive values of 89 and 96%, respectively. The efficiency of the PCA-based approach was particularly high among typical B-CLL, MCL and FL vs other B-CLPD cases. In summary, PCA-guided immunophenotypic classification of B-CLPD is a promising tool for standardized interpretation of tumor IP, their classification into well-defined entities and comprehensive evaluation of antibody panels. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3035971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30359712011-03-07 Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping Costa, E S Pedreira, C E Barrena, S Lecrevisse, Q Flores, J Quijano, S Almeida, J del Carmen García- Macias, M Bottcher, S Van Dongen, J J M Orfao, A Leukemia Original Article Immunophenotypic characterization of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD) is becoming increasingly complex due to usage of progressively larger panels of reagents and a high number of World Health Organization (WHO) entities. Typically, data analysis is performed separately for each stained aliquot of a sample; subsequently, an expert interprets the overall immunophenotypic profile (IP) of neoplastic B-cells and assigns it to specific diagnostic categories. We constructed a principal component analysis (PCA)-based tool to guide immunophenotypic classification of B-CLPD. Three reference groups of immunophenotypic data files—B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias (B-CLL; n=10), mantle cell (MCL; n=10) and follicular lymphomas (FL; n=10)—were built. Subsequently, each of the 175 cases studied was evaluated and assigned to either one of the three reference groups or to none of them (other B-CLPD). Most cases (89%) were correctly assigned to their corresponding WHO diagnostic group with overall positive and negative predictive values of 89 and 96%, respectively. The efficiency of the PCA-based approach was particularly high among typical B-CLL, MCL and FL vs other B-CLPD cases. In summary, PCA-guided immunophenotypic classification of B-CLPD is a promising tool for standardized interpretation of tumor IP, their classification into well-defined entities and comprehensive evaluation of antibody panels. Nature Publishing Group 2010-11 2010-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3035971/ /pubmed/20844562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.160 Text en Copyright © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Costa, E S Pedreira, C E Barrena, S Lecrevisse, Q Flores, J Quijano, S Almeida, J del Carmen García- Macias, M Bottcher, S Van Dongen, J J M Orfao, A Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping |
title | Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping |
title_full | Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping |
title_fullStr | Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping |
title_short | Automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping |
title_sort | automated pattern-guided principal component analysis vs expert-based immunophenotypic classification of b-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: a step forward in the standardization of clinical immunophenotyping |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3035971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20844562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costaes automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT pedreirace automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT barrenas automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT lecrevisseq automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT floresj automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT quijanos automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT almeidaj automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT delcarmengarciamaciasm automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT bottchers automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT vandongenjjm automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping AT orfaoa automatedpatternguidedprincipalcomponentanalysisvsexpertbasedimmunophenotypicclassificationofbcellchroniclymphoproliferativedisordersastepforwardinthestandardizationofclinicalimmunophenotyping |