Cargando…

Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization

BACKGROUND: Electroporation is a method of disrupting the integrity of cell membrane by electric pulses (EPs). Electrical modeling is widely employed to explain and study electroporation, but even most advanced models show limited predictive power. No studies have accounted for the biological conseq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pakhomova, Olga N., Gregory, Betsy W., Khorokhorina, Vera A., Bowman, Angela M., Xiao, Shu, Pakhomov, Andrei G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3036735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017100
_version_ 1782197895143882752
author Pakhomova, Olga N.
Gregory, Betsy W.
Khorokhorina, Vera A.
Bowman, Angela M.
Xiao, Shu
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
author_facet Pakhomova, Olga N.
Gregory, Betsy W.
Khorokhorina, Vera A.
Bowman, Angela M.
Xiao, Shu
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
author_sort Pakhomova, Olga N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electroporation is a method of disrupting the integrity of cell membrane by electric pulses (EPs). Electrical modeling is widely employed to explain and study electroporation, but even most advanced models show limited predictive power. No studies have accounted for the biological consequences of electroporation as a factor that alters the cell's susceptibility to forthcoming EPs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We focused first on the role of EP rate for membrane permeabilization and lethal effects in mammalian cells. The rate was varied from 0.001 to 2,000 Hz while keeping other parameters constant (2 to 3,750 pulses of 60-ns to 9-µs duration, 1.8 to 13.3 kV/cm). The efficiency of all EP treatments was minimal at high rates and started to increase gradually when the rate decreased below a certain value. Although this value ranged widely (0.1–500 Hz), it always corresponded to the overall treatment duration near 10 s. We further found that longer exposures were more efficient irrespective of the EP rate, and that splitting a high-rate EP train in two fractions with 1–5 min delay enhanced the effects severalfold. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For varied experimental conditions, EPs triggered a delayed and gradual sensitization to EPs. When a portion of a multi-pulse exposure was delivered to already sensitized cells, the overall effect markedly increased. Because of the sensitization, the lethality in EP-treated cells could be increased from 0 to 90% simply by increasing the exposure duration, or the exposure dose could be reduced twofold without reducing the effect. Many applications of electroporation can benefit from accounting for sensitization, by organizing the exposure either to maximize sensitization (e.g., for sterilization) or, for other applications, to completely or partially avoid it. In particular, harmful side effects of electroporation-based therapies (electrochemotherapy, gene therapies, tumor ablation) include convulsions, pain, heart fibrillation, and thermal damage. Sensitization can potentially be employed to reduce these side effects while preserving or increasing therapeutic efficiency.
format Text
id pubmed-3036735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30367352011-02-23 Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization Pakhomova, Olga N. Gregory, Betsy W. Khorokhorina, Vera A. Bowman, Angela M. Xiao, Shu Pakhomov, Andrei G. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Electroporation is a method of disrupting the integrity of cell membrane by electric pulses (EPs). Electrical modeling is widely employed to explain and study electroporation, but even most advanced models show limited predictive power. No studies have accounted for the biological consequences of electroporation as a factor that alters the cell's susceptibility to forthcoming EPs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We focused first on the role of EP rate for membrane permeabilization and lethal effects in mammalian cells. The rate was varied from 0.001 to 2,000 Hz while keeping other parameters constant (2 to 3,750 pulses of 60-ns to 9-µs duration, 1.8 to 13.3 kV/cm). The efficiency of all EP treatments was minimal at high rates and started to increase gradually when the rate decreased below a certain value. Although this value ranged widely (0.1–500 Hz), it always corresponded to the overall treatment duration near 10 s. We further found that longer exposures were more efficient irrespective of the EP rate, and that splitting a high-rate EP train in two fractions with 1–5 min delay enhanced the effects severalfold. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: For varied experimental conditions, EPs triggered a delayed and gradual sensitization to EPs. When a portion of a multi-pulse exposure was delivered to already sensitized cells, the overall effect markedly increased. Because of the sensitization, the lethality in EP-treated cells could be increased from 0 to 90% simply by increasing the exposure duration, or the exposure dose could be reduced twofold without reducing the effect. Many applications of electroporation can benefit from accounting for sensitization, by organizing the exposure either to maximize sensitization (e.g., for sterilization) or, for other applications, to completely or partially avoid it. In particular, harmful side effects of electroporation-based therapies (electrochemotherapy, gene therapies, tumor ablation) include convulsions, pain, heart fibrillation, and thermal damage. Sensitization can potentially be employed to reduce these side effects while preserving or increasing therapeutic efficiency. Public Library of Science 2011-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3036735/ /pubmed/21347394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017100 Text en Pakhomova et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pakhomova, Olga N.
Gregory, Betsy W.
Khorokhorina, Vera A.
Bowman, Angela M.
Xiao, Shu
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization
title Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization
title_full Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization
title_fullStr Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization
title_full_unstemmed Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization
title_short Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization
title_sort electroporation-induced electrosensitization
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3036735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017100
work_keys_str_mv AT pakhomovaolgan electroporationinducedelectrosensitization
AT gregorybetsyw electroporationinducedelectrosensitization
AT khorokhorinaveraa electroporationinducedelectrosensitization
AT bowmanangelam electroporationinducedelectrosensitization
AT xiaoshu electroporationinducedelectrosensitization
AT pakhomovandreig electroporationinducedelectrosensitization