Cargando…

A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives

Objective of this paper is to study how DNA-test result information was communicated and perceived within families. A retrospective descriptive study in 13 probands with a BRCA1/2 unclassified variant, 7 with a pathogenic mutation, 5 with an uninformative result, and in 44, 14, and 12 of their 1st a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vos, Joël, Menko, Fred, Jansen, Anna M., van Asperen, Christi J., Stiggelbout, Anne M., Tibben, Aad
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3036814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20852944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y
_version_ 1782197902526906368
author Vos, Joël
Menko, Fred
Jansen, Anna M.
van Asperen, Christi J.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Tibben, Aad
author_facet Vos, Joël
Menko, Fred
Jansen, Anna M.
van Asperen, Christi J.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Tibben, Aad
author_sort Vos, Joël
collection PubMed
description Objective of this paper is to study how DNA-test result information was communicated and perceived within families. A retrospective descriptive study in 13 probands with a BRCA1/2 unclassified variant, 7 with a pathogenic mutation, 5 with an uninformative result, and in 44, 14, and 12 of their 1st and 2nd degree relatives respectively. We examined differences and correlations between: (a) information actually communicated (b) probands’ perception, (c) relatives’ perception. The perception consisted of recollections and interpretations of both their own and their relatives’ cancer-risks, and heredity-likelihood (i.e. likelihood that cancer is heritable in the family). Differences and low correlations suggested few similarities between the actually communicated information, the probands’ and the relatives’ perception. More specifically, probands recalled the communicated information differently compared with the actually communicated information (R = .40), and reinterpreted this information differently (R = .30). The relatives’ perception was best correlated with the proband’s interpretation (R = .08), but this perception differed significantly from their proband’s perception. Finally, relatives reinterpreted the information they received from their proband differently (R = .25), and this interpretation was only slightly related with the original message communicated by the genetic-counsellor (R = .15). Unclassified-variants were most frequently misinterpreted by probands and relatives, and had the largest differences between probands’ and relatives’ perceptions. Like in a children’s whisper-game, many errors occur in the transmission of DNA-test result information in families. More attention is required for how probands disseminate information to relatives. Genetic-counsellors may help by supporting the probands in communicating to relatives, e.g. by providing clear summary letters for relatives.
format Text
id pubmed-3036814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30368142011-03-16 A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives Vos, Joël Menko, Fred Jansen, Anna M. van Asperen, Christi J. Stiggelbout, Anne M. Tibben, Aad Fam Cancer Article Objective of this paper is to study how DNA-test result information was communicated and perceived within families. A retrospective descriptive study in 13 probands with a BRCA1/2 unclassified variant, 7 with a pathogenic mutation, 5 with an uninformative result, and in 44, 14, and 12 of their 1st and 2nd degree relatives respectively. We examined differences and correlations between: (a) information actually communicated (b) probands’ perception, (c) relatives’ perception. The perception consisted of recollections and interpretations of both their own and their relatives’ cancer-risks, and heredity-likelihood (i.e. likelihood that cancer is heritable in the family). Differences and low correlations suggested few similarities between the actually communicated information, the probands’ and the relatives’ perception. More specifically, probands recalled the communicated information differently compared with the actually communicated information (R = .40), and reinterpreted this information differently (R = .30). The relatives’ perception was best correlated with the proband’s interpretation (R = .08), but this perception differed significantly from their proband’s perception. Finally, relatives reinterpreted the information they received from their proband differently (R = .25), and this interpretation was only slightly related with the original message communicated by the genetic-counsellor (R = .15). Unclassified-variants were most frequently misinterpreted by probands and relatives, and had the largest differences between probands’ and relatives’ perceptions. Like in a children’s whisper-game, many errors occur in the transmission of DNA-test result information in families. More attention is required for how probands disseminate information to relatives. Genetic-counsellors may help by supporting the probands in communicating to relatives, e.g. by providing clear summary letters for relatives. Springer Netherlands 2010-09-18 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3036814/ /pubmed/20852944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Vos, Joël
Menko, Fred
Jansen, Anna M.
van Asperen, Christi J.
Stiggelbout, Anne M.
Tibben, Aad
A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives
title A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives
title_full A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives
title_fullStr A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives
title_full_unstemmed A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives
title_short A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives
title_sort whisper-game perspective on the family communication of dna-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of brca1/2-test results between proband and relatives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3036814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20852944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9385-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vosjoel awhispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT menkofred awhispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT jansenannam awhispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT vanasperenchristij awhispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT stiggelboutannem awhispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT tibbenaad awhispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT vosjoel whispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT menkofred whispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT jansenannam whispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT vanasperenchristij whispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT stiggelboutannem whispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives
AT tibbenaad whispergameperspectiveonthefamilycommunicationofdnatestresultsaretrospectivestudyonthecommunicationprocessofbrca12testresultsbetweenprobandandrelatives