Cargando…
Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros
We studied three different tricepiros: (Don Santiago x Don Noé), (Cumé x Horovitz) and (Cumé x Don Noé). The tricepiro (Don Santiago x Don Noé) was obtained by crossing the triticale Don Santiago INTA (AABBRR, 2n = 6x = 42) with the trigopiro Don Noé INTA (AABBDDJJ, 2n = 8x = 56). The number of chro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3036882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572009005000070 |
_version_ | 1782197916968943616 |
---|---|
author | Fradkin, Maia Greizerstein, Eduardo Paccapelo, Héctor Ferreira, Víctor Grassi, Ezequiel Poggio, Lidia Ferrari, María Rosa |
author_facet | Fradkin, Maia Greizerstein, Eduardo Paccapelo, Héctor Ferreira, Víctor Grassi, Ezequiel Poggio, Lidia Ferrari, María Rosa |
author_sort | Fradkin, Maia |
collection | PubMed |
description | We studied three different tricepiros: (Don Santiago x Don Noé), (Cumé x Horovitz) and (Cumé x Don Noé). The tricepiro (Don Santiago x Don Noé) was obtained by crossing the triticale Don Santiago INTA (AABBRR, 2n = 6x = 42) with the trigopiro Don Noé INTA (AABBDDJJ, 2n = 8x = 56). The number of chromosomes for the F(1) was 2n = 49, the most frequent meiotic configuration being 14 bivalents and 21 univalents. The univalents were situated in the periphery of the equatorial plane, whereas the bivalents were located in the central zone. The chromatids in some of the univalents split when bivalents underwent reductional division in anaphase I. There were few laggard chromosomes or chromatids at this phase. The number of chromosomes (2n = 48-58) was high and variable, and the number of bivalents per cell (18-23) also high in F (3) individuals. In all F (8) tricepiros (Don Santiago x Don Noé), F (12) tricepiros (Cumé x Horovitz) and F (12) tricepiros (Cumé x Don Noé), the number of chromosomes (2n = 42) was the same, these retaining the rye genome, as demonstrated by GISH and FISH. These new synthesized allopolyploids constitute interesting models for investigating the evolutionary changes responsible for diploidization, and the chromosomal and genomic re-ordering that cannot be revealed in natural allopolyploids. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3036882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Genética |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30368822011-06-02 Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros Fradkin, Maia Greizerstein, Eduardo Paccapelo, Héctor Ferreira, Víctor Grassi, Ezequiel Poggio, Lidia Ferrari, María Rosa Genet Mol Biol Plant Genetics We studied three different tricepiros: (Don Santiago x Don Noé), (Cumé x Horovitz) and (Cumé x Don Noé). The tricepiro (Don Santiago x Don Noé) was obtained by crossing the triticale Don Santiago INTA (AABBRR, 2n = 6x = 42) with the trigopiro Don Noé INTA (AABBDDJJ, 2n = 8x = 56). The number of chromosomes for the F(1) was 2n = 49, the most frequent meiotic configuration being 14 bivalents and 21 univalents. The univalents were situated in the periphery of the equatorial plane, whereas the bivalents were located in the central zone. The chromatids in some of the univalents split when bivalents underwent reductional division in anaphase I. There were few laggard chromosomes or chromatids at this phase. The number of chromosomes (2n = 48-58) was high and variable, and the number of bivalents per cell (18-23) also high in F (3) individuals. In all F (8) tricepiros (Don Santiago x Don Noé), F (12) tricepiros (Cumé x Horovitz) and F (12) tricepiros (Cumé x Don Noé), the number of chromosomes (2n = 42) was the same, these retaining the rye genome, as demonstrated by GISH and FISH. These new synthesized allopolyploids constitute interesting models for investigating the evolutionary changes responsible for diploidization, and the chromosomal and genomic re-ordering that cannot be revealed in natural allopolyploids. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética 2009 2009-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3036882/ /pubmed/21637457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572009005000070 Text en Copyright © 2009, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Plant Genetics Fradkin, Maia Greizerstein, Eduardo Paccapelo, Héctor Ferreira, Víctor Grassi, Ezequiel Poggio, Lidia Ferrari, María Rosa Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros |
title | Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros |
title_full | Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros |
title_fullStr | Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros |
title_full_unstemmed | Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros |
title_short | Cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros |
title_sort | cytological analysis of hybrids among triticales and trigopiros |
topic | Plant Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3036882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572009005000070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fradkinmaia cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros AT greizersteineduardo cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros AT paccapelohector cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros AT ferreiravictor cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros AT grassiezequiel cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros AT poggiolidia cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros AT ferrarimariarosa cytologicalanalysisofhybridsamongtriticalesandtrigopiros |