Cargando…
Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients
OBJECTIVES: To compare the skeletal and the airway structures of the non-snoring individuals with simple snoring and patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: The first group consisted of 20 simple snoring cases (mean age: 37.5±8.05 years; max: 50 years, min: 21 years), the second group...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Investigations Society
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21311612 |
_version_ | 1782197954455535616 |
---|---|
author | Kurt, Gokmen Sisman, Cemal Akin, Erol Akcam, Timur |
author_facet | Kurt, Gokmen Sisman, Cemal Akin, Erol Akcam, Timur |
author_sort | Kurt, Gokmen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the skeletal and the airway structures of the non-snoring individuals with simple snoring and patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: The first group consisted of 20 simple snoring cases (mean age: 37.5±8.05 years; max: 50 years, min: 21 years), the second group consisted of 20 OSA cases (mean age: 40.0±8.28 years; max: 54 years, min: 27 years) and the third group consisted of 20 individuals without any respiration problems (mean age: 29.6±3.20 years; max: 35 years, min: 24 years). In the cephalometric films, 4 skeletal and 14 airway space measurements were done. The control group and the study groups were compared using the Dunnett t test, and the groups with snoring problems were compared using the Bonferroni test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups in skeletal measurements. The OSA and simple snoring groups showed no significant differences in airway measurements. The OSA group showed significantly increased soft palate angulation when compared with the control group (P<.05). Soft palate length, soft palate thickness and soft palate height were significantly higher in the OSA samples than in the control group (P<.001). Pharyngeal spaces in the soft palate area had the significantly lowest values in the OSA group. Inferior pharyngeal space distances in the control group were greater than in both study groups. The OSA group showed the most inferiorly positioned hyoid bone and the difference between OSA and control groups was significant (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The decreased airway dimension in the soft palate area due to increased soft palate volume must be taken into consideration in treatment planning of OSA patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3037194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Dental Investigations Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30371942011-02-10 Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients Kurt, Gokmen Sisman, Cemal Akin, Erol Akcam, Timur Eur J Dent Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To compare the skeletal and the airway structures of the non-snoring individuals with simple snoring and patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: The first group consisted of 20 simple snoring cases (mean age: 37.5±8.05 years; max: 50 years, min: 21 years), the second group consisted of 20 OSA cases (mean age: 40.0±8.28 years; max: 54 years, min: 27 years) and the third group consisted of 20 individuals without any respiration problems (mean age: 29.6±3.20 years; max: 35 years, min: 24 years). In the cephalometric films, 4 skeletal and 14 airway space measurements were done. The control group and the study groups were compared using the Dunnett t test, and the groups with snoring problems were compared using the Bonferroni test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups in skeletal measurements. The OSA and simple snoring groups showed no significant differences in airway measurements. The OSA group showed significantly increased soft palate angulation when compared with the control group (P<.05). Soft palate length, soft palate thickness and soft palate height were significantly higher in the OSA samples than in the control group (P<.001). Pharyngeal spaces in the soft palate area had the significantly lowest values in the OSA group. Inferior pharyngeal space distances in the control group were greater than in both study groups. The OSA group showed the most inferiorly positioned hyoid bone and the difference between OSA and control groups was significant (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The decreased airway dimension in the soft palate area due to increased soft palate volume must be taken into consideration in treatment planning of OSA patients. Dental Investigations Society 2011-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3037194/ /pubmed/21311612 Text en Copyright 2011 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kurt, Gokmen Sisman, Cemal Akin, Erol Akcam, Timur Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients |
title | Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients |
title_full | Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients |
title_fullStr | Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients |
title_short | Cephalometric Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway in Snoring and Non-Snoring Patients |
title_sort | cephalometric comparison of pharyngeal airway in snoring and non-snoring patients |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21311612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kurtgokmen cephalometriccomparisonofpharyngealairwayinsnoringandnonsnoringpatients AT sismancemal cephalometriccomparisonofpharyngealairwayinsnoringandnonsnoringpatients AT akinerol cephalometriccomparisonofpharyngealairwayinsnoringandnonsnoringpatients AT akcamtimur cephalometriccomparisonofpharyngealairwayinsnoringandnonsnoringpatients |