Cargando…

Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest

BACKGROUND: Soil characteristics have been hypothesised as one of the possible mechanisms leading to monodominance of Gilbertiodendron dewerei in some areas of Central Africa where higher-diversity forest would be expected. However, the differences in soil characteristics between the G. dewevrei-dom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peh, Kelvin S. -H., Sonké, Bonaventure, Lloyd, Jon, Quesada, Carlos A., Lewis, Simon L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016996
_version_ 1782197988009967616
author Peh, Kelvin S. -H.
Sonké, Bonaventure
Lloyd, Jon
Quesada, Carlos A.
Lewis, Simon L.
author_facet Peh, Kelvin S. -H.
Sonké, Bonaventure
Lloyd, Jon
Quesada, Carlos A.
Lewis, Simon L.
author_sort Peh, Kelvin S. -H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Soil characteristics have been hypothesised as one of the possible mechanisms leading to monodominance of Gilbertiodendron dewerei in some areas of Central Africa where higher-diversity forest would be expected. However, the differences in soil characteristics between the G. dewevrei-dominated forest and its adjacent mixed forest are still poorly understood. Here we present the soil characteristics of the G. dewevrei forest and quantify whether soil physical and chemical properties in this monodominant forest are significantly different from the adjacent mixed forest. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We sampled top soil (0–5, 5–10, 10–20, 20–30 cm) and subsoil (150–200 cm) using an augur in 6 × 1 ha areas of intact central Africa forest in SE Cameroon, three independent patches of G. dewevrei-dominated forest and three adjacent areas (450–800 m apart), all chosen to be topographically homogeneous. Analysis – subjected to Bonferroni correction procedure – revealed no significant differences between the monodominant and mixed forests in terms of soil texture, median particle size, bulk density, pH, carbon (C) content, nitrogen (N) content, C:N ratio, C:total NaOH-extractable P ratio and concentrations of labile phosphorous (P), inorganic NaOH-extractable P, total NaOH-extractable P, aluminium, barium, calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, potassium, selenium, silicon, sodium and zinc. Prior to Bonferroni correction procedure, there was a significant lower level of silicon concentration found in the monodominant than mixed forest deep soil; and a significant lower level of nickel concentration in the monodominant than mixed forest top soil. Nevertheless, these were likely to be the results of multiple tests of significance. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results do not provide clear evidence of soil mediation for the location of monodominant forests in relation to adjacent mixed forests. It is also likely that G. dewevrei does not influence soil chemistry in the monodominant forests.
format Text
id pubmed-3037391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30373912011-02-23 Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest Peh, Kelvin S. -H. Sonké, Bonaventure Lloyd, Jon Quesada, Carlos A. Lewis, Simon L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Soil characteristics have been hypothesised as one of the possible mechanisms leading to monodominance of Gilbertiodendron dewerei in some areas of Central Africa where higher-diversity forest would be expected. However, the differences in soil characteristics between the G. dewevrei-dominated forest and its adjacent mixed forest are still poorly understood. Here we present the soil characteristics of the G. dewevrei forest and quantify whether soil physical and chemical properties in this monodominant forest are significantly different from the adjacent mixed forest. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We sampled top soil (0–5, 5–10, 10–20, 20–30 cm) and subsoil (150–200 cm) using an augur in 6 × 1 ha areas of intact central Africa forest in SE Cameroon, three independent patches of G. dewevrei-dominated forest and three adjacent areas (450–800 m apart), all chosen to be topographically homogeneous. Analysis – subjected to Bonferroni correction procedure – revealed no significant differences between the monodominant and mixed forests in terms of soil texture, median particle size, bulk density, pH, carbon (C) content, nitrogen (N) content, C:N ratio, C:total NaOH-extractable P ratio and concentrations of labile phosphorous (P), inorganic NaOH-extractable P, total NaOH-extractable P, aluminium, barium, calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, potassium, selenium, silicon, sodium and zinc. Prior to Bonferroni correction procedure, there was a significant lower level of silicon concentration found in the monodominant than mixed forest deep soil; and a significant lower level of nickel concentration in the monodominant than mixed forest top soil. Nevertheless, these were likely to be the results of multiple tests of significance. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results do not provide clear evidence of soil mediation for the location of monodominant forests in relation to adjacent mixed forests. It is also likely that G. dewevrei does not influence soil chemistry in the monodominant forests. Public Library of Science 2011-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3037391/ /pubmed/21347320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016996 Text en Peh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peh, Kelvin S. -H.
Sonké, Bonaventure
Lloyd, Jon
Quesada, Carlos A.
Lewis, Simon L.
Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest
title Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest
title_full Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest
title_fullStr Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest
title_full_unstemmed Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest
title_short Soil Does Not Explain Monodominance in a Central African Tropical Forest
title_sort soil does not explain monodominance in a central african tropical forest
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016996
work_keys_str_mv AT pehkelvinsh soildoesnotexplainmonodominanceinacentralafricantropicalforest
AT sonkebonaventure soildoesnotexplainmonodominanceinacentralafricantropicalforest
AT lloydjon soildoesnotexplainmonodominanceinacentralafricantropicalforest
AT quesadacarlosa soildoesnotexplainmonodominanceinacentralafricantropicalforest
AT lewissimonl soildoesnotexplainmonodominanceinacentralafricantropicalforest