Cargando…

Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading

BACKGROUND: Theories of embodied language suggest that the motor system is differentially called into action when processing motor-related versus abstract content words or sentences. It has been recently shown that processing negative polarity action-related sentences modulates neural activity of pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liuzza, Marco Tullio, Candidi, Matteo, Aglioti, Salvatore Maria
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016855
_version_ 1782198041574375424
author Liuzza, Marco Tullio
Candidi, Matteo
Aglioti, Salvatore Maria
author_facet Liuzza, Marco Tullio
Candidi, Matteo
Aglioti, Salvatore Maria
author_sort Liuzza, Marco Tullio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Theories of embodied language suggest that the motor system is differentially called into action when processing motor-related versus abstract content words or sentences. It has been recently shown that processing negative polarity action-related sentences modulates neural activity of premotor and motor cortices. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We sought to determine whether reading negative polarity sentences brought about differential modulation of cortico-spinal motor excitability depending on processing hand-action related or abstract sentences. Facilitatory paired-pulses Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (pp-TMS) was applied to the primary motor representation of the right-hand and the recorded amplitude of induced motor-evoked potentials (MEP) was used to index M1 activity during passive reading of either hand-action related or abstract content sentences presented in both negative and affirmative polarity. Results showed that the cortico-spinal excitability was affected by sentence polarity only in the hand-action related condition. Indeed, in keeping with previous TMS studies, reading positive polarity, hand action-related sentences suppressed cortico-spinal reactivity. This effect was absent when reading hand action-related negative polarity sentences. Moreover, no modulation of cortico-spinal reactivity was associated with either negative or positive polarity abstract sentences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that grammatical cues prompting motor negation reduce the cortico-spinal suppression associated with affirmative action sentences reading and thus suggest that motor simulative processes underlying the embodiment may involve even syntactic features of language.
format Text
id pubmed-3037953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30379532011-02-23 Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading Liuzza, Marco Tullio Candidi, Matteo Aglioti, Salvatore Maria PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Theories of embodied language suggest that the motor system is differentially called into action when processing motor-related versus abstract content words or sentences. It has been recently shown that processing negative polarity action-related sentences modulates neural activity of premotor and motor cortices. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We sought to determine whether reading negative polarity sentences brought about differential modulation of cortico-spinal motor excitability depending on processing hand-action related or abstract sentences. Facilitatory paired-pulses Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (pp-TMS) was applied to the primary motor representation of the right-hand and the recorded amplitude of induced motor-evoked potentials (MEP) was used to index M1 activity during passive reading of either hand-action related or abstract content sentences presented in both negative and affirmative polarity. Results showed that the cortico-spinal excitability was affected by sentence polarity only in the hand-action related condition. Indeed, in keeping with previous TMS studies, reading positive polarity, hand action-related sentences suppressed cortico-spinal reactivity. This effect was absent when reading hand action-related negative polarity sentences. Moreover, no modulation of cortico-spinal reactivity was associated with either negative or positive polarity abstract sentences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that grammatical cues prompting motor negation reduce the cortico-spinal suppression associated with affirmative action sentences reading and thus suggest that motor simulative processes underlying the embodiment may involve even syntactic features of language. Public Library of Science 2011-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3037953/ /pubmed/21347305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016855 Text en Liuzza et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liuzza, Marco Tullio
Candidi, Matteo
Aglioti, Salvatore Maria
Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading
title Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading
title_full Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading
title_fullStr Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading
title_full_unstemmed Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading
title_short Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading
title_sort do not resonate with actions: sentence polarity modulates cortico-spinal excitability during action-related sentence reading
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016855
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzzamarcotullio donotresonatewithactionssentencepolaritymodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityduringactionrelatedsentencereading
AT candidimatteo donotresonatewithactionssentencepolaritymodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityduringactionrelatedsentencereading
AT agliotisalvatoremaria donotresonatewithactionssentencepolaritymodulatescorticospinalexcitabilityduringactionrelatedsentencereading