Cargando…

A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation

BACKGROUND: Equity focused health impact assessments (EFHIAs), or health equity impact assessments, are being increasingly promoted internationally as a mechanism for enhancing the consideration of health equity in the development of policies, programs and projects. Despite this there are relatively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris-Roxas, Ben F, Harris, Patrick J, Harris, Elizabeth, Kemp, Lynn A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3038149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-6
_version_ 1782198055979712512
author Harris-Roxas, Ben F
Harris, Patrick J
Harris, Elizabeth
Kemp, Lynn A
author_facet Harris-Roxas, Ben F
Harris, Patrick J
Harris, Elizabeth
Kemp, Lynn A
author_sort Harris-Roxas, Ben F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Equity focused health impact assessments (EFHIAs), or health equity impact assessments, are being increasingly promoted internationally as a mechanism for enhancing the consideration of health equity in the development of policies, programs and projects. Despite this there are relatively few examples of examples of completed EFHIAs available. This paper presents a case study of a rapid EFHIA that was conducted in Australia on a health promotion policy implementation plan. It briefly describes the process and findings of the EFHIA and evaluates the impact on decision-making and implementation. METHODS: The rapid EFHIA was undertaken in four days, drawing on an expert panel and limited review of the literature. A process evaluation was undertaken by email one month after the EFHIA was completed. An impact evaluation was undertaken two years later based on five semi-structured interviews with members of the EFHIA working group and policy officers and managers responsible for implementing the plan. A cost estimation was conducted by the EFHIA working group. FINDINGS: The EFHIA made both general and specific recommendations about how the health equity impacts of the policy implementation plan could be improved. The impact evaluation identified changes to development and implementation that occurred as a result of the EFHIA, though there was disagreement about the extent to which changes could be attributed solely to the EFHIA. Those responsible considered the recommendations of the EFHIA in the next versions of their ABHI implementation plans. Factors that influenced the impact of the EFHIA included consolidating understandings of equity, enabling discussion of alternatives, and differing understandings of the purpose of the EFHIA. The EFHIA cost US$4,036 to undertake. CONCLUSIONS: This EFHIA was conducted in a short timeframe using relatively few resources. It had some reported impacts on the development of the implementation plan and enhanced overall consideration of health equity. This case highlights some of the factors and preconditions that may maximise the impact of future EFHIAs on decision-making and implementation.
format Text
id pubmed-3038149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30381492011-02-13 A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation Harris-Roxas, Ben F Harris, Patrick J Harris, Elizabeth Kemp, Lynn A Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Equity focused health impact assessments (EFHIAs), or health equity impact assessments, are being increasingly promoted internationally as a mechanism for enhancing the consideration of health equity in the development of policies, programs and projects. Despite this there are relatively few examples of examples of completed EFHIAs available. This paper presents a case study of a rapid EFHIA that was conducted in Australia on a health promotion policy implementation plan. It briefly describes the process and findings of the EFHIA and evaluates the impact on decision-making and implementation. METHODS: The rapid EFHIA was undertaken in four days, drawing on an expert panel and limited review of the literature. A process evaluation was undertaken by email one month after the EFHIA was completed. An impact evaluation was undertaken two years later based on five semi-structured interviews with members of the EFHIA working group and policy officers and managers responsible for implementing the plan. A cost estimation was conducted by the EFHIA working group. FINDINGS: The EFHIA made both general and specific recommendations about how the health equity impacts of the policy implementation plan could be improved. The impact evaluation identified changes to development and implementation that occurred as a result of the EFHIA, though there was disagreement about the extent to which changes could be attributed solely to the EFHIA. Those responsible considered the recommendations of the EFHIA in the next versions of their ABHI implementation plans. Factors that influenced the impact of the EFHIA included consolidating understandings of equity, enabling discussion of alternatives, and differing understandings of the purpose of the EFHIA. The EFHIA cost US$4,036 to undertake. CONCLUSIONS: This EFHIA was conducted in a short timeframe using relatively few resources. It had some reported impacts on the development of the implementation plan and enhanced overall consideration of health equity. This case highlights some of the factors and preconditions that may maximise the impact of future EFHIAs on decision-making and implementation. BioMed Central 2011-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3038149/ /pubmed/21276265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-6 Text en Copyright ©2011 Harris-Roxas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Harris-Roxas, Ben F
Harris, Patrick J
Harris, Elizabeth
Kemp, Lynn A
A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
title A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
title_full A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
title_fullStr A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
title_full_unstemmed A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
title_short A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
title_sort rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: an australian case study and impact evaluation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3038149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-6
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisroxasbenf arapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation
AT harrispatrickj arapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation
AT harriselizabeth arapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation
AT kemplynna arapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation
AT harrisroxasbenf rapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation
AT harrispatrickj rapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation
AT harriselizabeth rapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation
AT kemplynna rapidequityfocusedhealthimpactassessmentofapolicyimplementationplananaustraliancasestudyandimpactevaluation