Cargando…
Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study
BACKGROUND: Machine perfusion (MP) has potential benefits for marginal organs such as from deceased from cardiac death donors (DCD). However, there is still no consensus on MP benefits. We aimed to determine machine perfusion benefits on kidney grafts. METHODS: We evaluated kidney grafts preserved i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3038164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21266040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-15 |
_version_ | 1782198059628756992 |
---|---|
author | Vaziri, Nader Thuillier, Raphaël Favreau, Frederic D Eugene, Michel Milin, Serge Chatauret, Nicolas P Hauet, Thierry Barrou, Benoit |
author_facet | Vaziri, Nader Thuillier, Raphaël Favreau, Frederic D Eugene, Michel Milin, Serge Chatauret, Nicolas P Hauet, Thierry Barrou, Benoit |
author_sort | Vaziri, Nader |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Machine perfusion (MP) has potential benefits for marginal organs such as from deceased from cardiac death donors (DCD). However, there is still no consensus on MP benefits. We aimed to determine machine perfusion benefits on kidney grafts. METHODS: We evaluated kidney grafts preserved in ViaspanUW or KPS solutions either by CS or MP, in a DCD pig model (60 min warm ischemia + 24 h hypothermic preservation). Endpoints were: function recovery, quality of function during follow up (3 month), inflammation, fibrosis, animal survival. RESULTS: ViaspanUW-CS animals did not recover function, while in other groups early follow up showed similar values for kidney function. Alanine peptidase and β-NAG activities in the urine were higher in CS than in MP groups. Oxydative stress was lower in KPS-MP animals. Histology was improved by MP over CS. Survival was 0% in ViaspanUW-CS and 60% in other groups. Chronic inflammation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrosis were lowest in KPS-MP, followed by KPS-CS and ViaspanUW-MP. CONCLUSIONS: With ViaspanUW, effects of MP are obvious as only MP kidney recovered function and allowed survival. With KPS, the benefits of MP over CS are not directly obvious in the early follow up period and only histological analysis, urinary tubular enzymes and red/ox status was discriminating. Chronic follow-up was more conclusive, with a clear superiority of MP over CS, independently of the solution used. KPS was proven superior to ViaspanUW in each preservation method in terms of function and outcome. In our pre-clinical animal model of DCD transplantation, MP offers critical benefits. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3038164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30381642011-02-13 Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study Vaziri, Nader Thuillier, Raphaël Favreau, Frederic D Eugene, Michel Milin, Serge Chatauret, Nicolas P Hauet, Thierry Barrou, Benoit J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Machine perfusion (MP) has potential benefits for marginal organs such as from deceased from cardiac death donors (DCD). However, there is still no consensus on MP benefits. We aimed to determine machine perfusion benefits on kidney grafts. METHODS: We evaluated kidney grafts preserved in ViaspanUW or KPS solutions either by CS or MP, in a DCD pig model (60 min warm ischemia + 24 h hypothermic preservation). Endpoints were: function recovery, quality of function during follow up (3 month), inflammation, fibrosis, animal survival. RESULTS: ViaspanUW-CS animals did not recover function, while in other groups early follow up showed similar values for kidney function. Alanine peptidase and β-NAG activities in the urine were higher in CS than in MP groups. Oxydative stress was lower in KPS-MP animals. Histology was improved by MP over CS. Survival was 0% in ViaspanUW-CS and 60% in other groups. Chronic inflammation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrosis were lowest in KPS-MP, followed by KPS-CS and ViaspanUW-MP. CONCLUSIONS: With ViaspanUW, effects of MP are obvious as only MP kidney recovered function and allowed survival. With KPS, the benefits of MP over CS are not directly obvious in the early follow up period and only histological analysis, urinary tubular enzymes and red/ox status was discriminating. Chronic follow-up was more conclusive, with a clear superiority of MP over CS, independently of the solution used. KPS was proven superior to ViaspanUW in each preservation method in terms of function and outcome. In our pre-clinical animal model of DCD transplantation, MP offers critical benefits. BioMed Central 2011-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3038164/ /pubmed/21266040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-15 Text en Copyright ©2011 Vaziri et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Vaziri, Nader Thuillier, Raphaël Favreau, Frederic D Eugene, Michel Milin, Serge Chatauret, Nicolas P Hauet, Thierry Barrou, Benoit Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study |
title | Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study |
title_full | Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study |
title_fullStr | Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study |
title_short | Analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study |
title_sort | analysis of machine perfusion benefits in kidney grafts: a preclinical study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3038164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21266040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-9-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vazirinader analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy AT thuillierraphael analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy AT favreaufredericd analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy AT eugenemichel analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy AT milinserge analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy AT chatauretnicolasp analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy AT hauetthierry analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy AT barroubenoit analysisofmachineperfusionbenefitsinkidneygraftsapreclinicalstudy |