Cargando…

Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco

BACKGROUND: Tobacco control efforts in Japan have lagged other high income countries, possibly because the Japanese government partially owns Japan Tobacco, Inc. In Japan, tobacco use is still often regarded as an issue of manners rather than an issue of health. Information about tobacco is availabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanamori, Yuko, Malone, Ruth E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3038894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21261991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1617-9625-9-3
_version_ 1782198138259374080
author Kanamori, Yuko
Malone, Ruth E
author_facet Kanamori, Yuko
Malone, Ruth E
author_sort Kanamori, Yuko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tobacco control efforts in Japan have lagged other high income countries, possibly because the Japanese government partially owns Japan Tobacco, Inc. In Japan, tobacco use is still often regarded as an issue of manners rather than an issue of health. Information about tobacco is available, but may not always be accurate. We explored what information Japanese consumers might access by reading popular Japanese books about tobacco. METHODS: We searched Amazon.com Japan using the term "Tobacco", identifying the top 12 books by "relevance" and "bestselling." We eliminated duplicates and books not concerned with tobacco use and classified the remaining books as pro-smoking, anti-smoking, or neutral. We reviewed the pro-smoking books, published 2004-2009, and analyzed examples of misinformation by theme. RESULTS: Pro-smoking popular books conveyed five types of misinformation: doubt about science; suggestions that smoking increased health, longevity, virility, etc.; trivializing tobacco's effects; attacking public health advocates/authorities; and linking tobacco use with authenticity, history, or civil rights. At least one book was authored by a former Japan Tobacco employee; another used a popular Japan Tobacco advertising phrase. CONCLUSIONS: Creating doubt and confusion about tobacco serves tobacco industry interests and re-creates a strategy developed by US tobacco interests more than 40 years ago. Japanese readers may be misled by texts such as those reviewed. Tobacco control and public health advocates in Japan and globally should expose and counter such misinformation. "Naming and shaming" may be effective.
format Text
id pubmed-3038894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30388942011-02-15 Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco Kanamori, Yuko Malone, Ruth E Tob Induc Dis Short Report BACKGROUND: Tobacco control efforts in Japan have lagged other high income countries, possibly because the Japanese government partially owns Japan Tobacco, Inc. In Japan, tobacco use is still often regarded as an issue of manners rather than an issue of health. Information about tobacco is available, but may not always be accurate. We explored what information Japanese consumers might access by reading popular Japanese books about tobacco. METHODS: We searched Amazon.com Japan using the term "Tobacco", identifying the top 12 books by "relevance" and "bestselling." We eliminated duplicates and books not concerned with tobacco use and classified the remaining books as pro-smoking, anti-smoking, or neutral. We reviewed the pro-smoking books, published 2004-2009, and analyzed examples of misinformation by theme. RESULTS: Pro-smoking popular books conveyed five types of misinformation: doubt about science; suggestions that smoking increased health, longevity, virility, etc.; trivializing tobacco's effects; attacking public health advocates/authorities; and linking tobacco use with authenticity, history, or civil rights. At least one book was authored by a former Japan Tobacco employee; another used a popular Japan Tobacco advertising phrase. CONCLUSIONS: Creating doubt and confusion about tobacco serves tobacco industry interests and re-creates a strategy developed by US tobacco interests more than 40 years ago. Japanese readers may be misled by texts such as those reviewed. Tobacco control and public health advocates in Japan and globally should expose and counter such misinformation. "Naming and shaming" may be effective. BioMed Central 2011-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3038894/ /pubmed/21261991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1617-9625-9-3 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kanamori and Malone; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Kanamori, Yuko
Malone, Ruth E
Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco
title Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco
title_full Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco
title_fullStr Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco
title_full_unstemmed Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco
title_short Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco
title_sort conveying misinformation: top-ranked japanese books on tobacco
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3038894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21261991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1617-9625-9-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kanamoriyuko conveyingmisinformationtoprankedjapanesebooksontobacco
AT maloneruthe conveyingmisinformationtoprankedjapanesebooksontobacco