Cargando…
Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity
Although the adult brain was once seen as a rather static organ, it is now clear that the organization of brain circuitry is constantly changing as a function of experience or learning. Yet, research also shows that learning is often specific to the trained stimuli and task, and does not improve per...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00017 |
_version_ | 1782198165747793920 |
---|---|
author | Slagter, Heleen A. Davidson, Richard J. Lutz, Antoine |
author_facet | Slagter, Heleen A. Davidson, Richard J. Lutz, Antoine |
author_sort | Slagter, Heleen A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the adult brain was once seen as a rather static organ, it is now clear that the organization of brain circuitry is constantly changing as a function of experience or learning. Yet, research also shows that learning is often specific to the trained stimuli and task, and does not improve performance on novel tasks, even very similar ones. This perspective examines the idea that systematic mental training, as cultivated by meditation, can induce learning that is not stimulus or task specific, but process specific. Many meditation practices are explicitly designed to enhance specific, well-defined core cognitive processes. We will argue that this focus on enhancing core cognitive processes, as well as several general characteristics of meditation regimens, may specifically foster process-specific learning. To this end, we first define meditation and discuss key findings from recent neuroimaging studies of meditation. We then identify several characteristics of specific meditation training regimes that may determine process-specific learning. These characteristics include ongoing variability in stimulus input, the meta-cognitive nature of the processes trained, task difficulty, the focus on maintaining an optimal level of arousal, and the duration of training. Lastly, we discuss the methodological challenges that researchers face when attempting to control or characterize the multiple factors that may underlie meditation training effects. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3039118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30391182011-02-23 Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity Slagter, Heleen A. Davidson, Richard J. Lutz, Antoine Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Although the adult brain was once seen as a rather static organ, it is now clear that the organization of brain circuitry is constantly changing as a function of experience or learning. Yet, research also shows that learning is often specific to the trained stimuli and task, and does not improve performance on novel tasks, even very similar ones. This perspective examines the idea that systematic mental training, as cultivated by meditation, can induce learning that is not stimulus or task specific, but process specific. Many meditation practices are explicitly designed to enhance specific, well-defined core cognitive processes. We will argue that this focus on enhancing core cognitive processes, as well as several general characteristics of meditation regimens, may specifically foster process-specific learning. To this end, we first define meditation and discuss key findings from recent neuroimaging studies of meditation. We then identify several characteristics of specific meditation training regimes that may determine process-specific learning. These characteristics include ongoing variability in stimulus input, the meta-cognitive nature of the processes trained, task difficulty, the focus on maintaining an optimal level of arousal, and the duration of training. Lastly, we discuss the methodological challenges that researchers face when attempting to control or characterize the multiple factors that may underlie meditation training effects. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3039118/ /pubmed/21347275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00017 Text en Copyright © 2011 Slagter, Davidson and Lutz. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Slagter, Heleen A. Davidson, Richard J. Lutz, Antoine Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity |
title | Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity |
title_full | Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity |
title_fullStr | Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity |
title_full_unstemmed | Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity |
title_short | Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity |
title_sort | mental training as a tool in the neuroscientific study of brain and cognitive plasticity |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slagterheleena mentaltrainingasatoolintheneuroscientificstudyofbrainandcognitiveplasticity AT davidsonrichardj mentaltrainingasatoolintheneuroscientificstudyofbrainandcognitiveplasticity AT lutzantoine mentaltrainingasatoolintheneuroscientificstudyofbrainandcognitiveplasticity |