Cargando…

Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity

Although the adult brain was once seen as a rather static organ, it is now clear that the organization of brain circuitry is constantly changing as a function of experience or learning. Yet, research also shows that learning is often specific to the trained stimuli and task, and does not improve per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slagter, Heleen A., Davidson, Richard J., Lutz, Antoine
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00017
_version_ 1782198165747793920
author Slagter, Heleen A.
Davidson, Richard J.
Lutz, Antoine
author_facet Slagter, Heleen A.
Davidson, Richard J.
Lutz, Antoine
author_sort Slagter, Heleen A.
collection PubMed
description Although the adult brain was once seen as a rather static organ, it is now clear that the organization of brain circuitry is constantly changing as a function of experience or learning. Yet, research also shows that learning is often specific to the trained stimuli and task, and does not improve performance on novel tasks, even very similar ones. This perspective examines the idea that systematic mental training, as cultivated by meditation, can induce learning that is not stimulus or task specific, but process specific. Many meditation practices are explicitly designed to enhance specific, well-defined core cognitive processes. We will argue that this focus on enhancing core cognitive processes, as well as several general characteristics of meditation regimens, may specifically foster process-specific learning. To this end, we first define meditation and discuss key findings from recent neuroimaging studies of meditation. We then identify several characteristics of specific meditation training regimes that may determine process-specific learning. These characteristics include ongoing variability in stimulus input, the meta-cognitive nature of the processes trained, task difficulty, the focus on maintaining an optimal level of arousal, and the duration of training. Lastly, we discuss the methodological challenges that researchers face when attempting to control or characterize the multiple factors that may underlie meditation training effects.
format Text
id pubmed-3039118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30391182011-02-23 Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity Slagter, Heleen A. Davidson, Richard J. Lutz, Antoine Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Although the adult brain was once seen as a rather static organ, it is now clear that the organization of brain circuitry is constantly changing as a function of experience or learning. Yet, research also shows that learning is often specific to the trained stimuli and task, and does not improve performance on novel tasks, even very similar ones. This perspective examines the idea that systematic mental training, as cultivated by meditation, can induce learning that is not stimulus or task specific, but process specific. Many meditation practices are explicitly designed to enhance specific, well-defined core cognitive processes. We will argue that this focus on enhancing core cognitive processes, as well as several general characteristics of meditation regimens, may specifically foster process-specific learning. To this end, we first define meditation and discuss key findings from recent neuroimaging studies of meditation. We then identify several characteristics of specific meditation training regimes that may determine process-specific learning. These characteristics include ongoing variability in stimulus input, the meta-cognitive nature of the processes trained, task difficulty, the focus on maintaining an optimal level of arousal, and the duration of training. Lastly, we discuss the methodological challenges that researchers face when attempting to control or characterize the multiple factors that may underlie meditation training effects. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3039118/ /pubmed/21347275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00017 Text en Copyright © 2011 Slagter, Davidson and Lutz. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Slagter, Heleen A.
Davidson, Richard J.
Lutz, Antoine
Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity
title Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity
title_full Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity
title_fullStr Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity
title_full_unstemmed Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity
title_short Mental Training as a Tool in the Neuroscientific Study of Brain and Cognitive Plasticity
title_sort mental training as a tool in the neuroscientific study of brain and cognitive plasticity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00017
work_keys_str_mv AT slagterheleena mentaltrainingasatoolintheneuroscientificstudyofbrainandcognitiveplasticity
AT davidsonrichardj mentaltrainingasatoolintheneuroscientificstudyofbrainandcognitiveplasticity
AT lutzantoine mentaltrainingasatoolintheneuroscientificstudyofbrainandcognitiveplasticity