Cargando…
Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an invasive modality which provides cross-sectional images of a coronary artery. In these images both the lumen and outer vessel wall can be identified and accurate estimations of their dimensions and of the plaque burden can be obtained. In addition, further proce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-9-2 |
_version_ | 1782198195489603584 |
---|---|
author | Bourantas, Christos V Garg, Scot Naka, Katerina K Thury, Attila Hoye, Angela Michalis, Lampros K |
author_facet | Bourantas, Christos V Garg, Scot Naka, Katerina K Thury, Attila Hoye, Angela Michalis, Lampros K |
author_sort | Bourantas, Christos V |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an invasive modality which provides cross-sectional images of a coronary artery. In these images both the lumen and outer vessel wall can be identified and accurate estimations of their dimensions and of the plaque burden can be obtained. In addition, further processing of the IVUS backscatter signal helps in the characterization of the type of the plaque and thus it has been used to study the natural history of the atherosclerotic evolution. On the other hand its indigenous limitations do not allow IVUS to assess accurately stent struts coverage, existence of thrombus or exact site of plaque rupture and to identify some of the features associated with increased plaque vulnerability. In order this information to be obtained, other modalities such as optical coherence tomography, angioscopy, near infrared spectroscopy and intravascular magnetic resonance imaging have either been utilized or are under evaluation. The aim of this review article is to present the current utilities of IVUS in research and to discuss its advantages and disadvantages over the other imaging techniques. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3039561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30395612011-02-16 Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities Bourantas, Christos V Garg, Scot Naka, Katerina K Thury, Attila Hoye, Angela Michalis, Lampros K Cardiovasc Ultrasound Review Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an invasive modality which provides cross-sectional images of a coronary artery. In these images both the lumen and outer vessel wall can be identified and accurate estimations of their dimensions and of the plaque burden can be obtained. In addition, further processing of the IVUS backscatter signal helps in the characterization of the type of the plaque and thus it has been used to study the natural history of the atherosclerotic evolution. On the other hand its indigenous limitations do not allow IVUS to assess accurately stent struts coverage, existence of thrombus or exact site of plaque rupture and to identify some of the features associated with increased plaque vulnerability. In order this information to be obtained, other modalities such as optical coherence tomography, angioscopy, near infrared spectroscopy and intravascular magnetic resonance imaging have either been utilized or are under evaluation. The aim of this review article is to present the current utilities of IVUS in research and to discuss its advantages and disadvantages over the other imaging techniques. BioMed Central 2011-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3039561/ /pubmed/21276268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-9-2 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bourantas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Bourantas, Christos V Garg, Scot Naka, Katerina K Thury, Attila Hoye, Angela Michalis, Lampros K Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities |
title | Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities |
title_full | Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities |
title_fullStr | Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities |
title_full_unstemmed | Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities |
title_short | Focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities |
title_sort | focus on the research utility of intravascular ultrasound - comparison with other invasive modalities |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-9-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bourantaschristosv focusontheresearchutilityofintravascularultrasoundcomparisonwithotherinvasivemodalities AT gargscot focusontheresearchutilityofintravascularultrasoundcomparisonwithotherinvasivemodalities AT nakakaterinak focusontheresearchutilityofintravascularultrasoundcomparisonwithotherinvasivemodalities AT thuryattila focusontheresearchutilityofintravascularultrasoundcomparisonwithotherinvasivemodalities AT hoyeangela focusontheresearchutilityofintravascularultrasoundcomparisonwithotherinvasivemodalities AT michalislamprosk focusontheresearchutilityofintravascularultrasoundcomparisonwithotherinvasivemodalities |